Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Combining statistical and dynamical methods for hydrologic prediction

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Combining statistical and dynamical methods for hydrologic prediction"— Presentation transcript:

1 Combining statistical and dynamical methods for hydrologic prediction
Andy Wood Seminar Land Surface Hydrology Research Group Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Washington Dec 19, 2006

2 Outline Ensemble Forecast Calibration
Synoptic Scale Hydrologic Indices

3 The importance of Seasonal Hydrologic Forecasting
water management hydropower irrigation flood control water supply fisheries recreation navigation water quality Aug Dec Apr Reservoir Storage

4 How does one make a forecast of river flow?
Naïve forecast (“climatology”) – simply use historical averages Persistence (of states or anomalies) (Multiple) Regression Forecast Traditional Predictors: snowpack (SWE), accumulated precipitation, current or past river flow, measured over the drainage basin More advanced predictors: ENSO state indicators (Nino3.4, SOI) Predictand: daily, monthly or seasonal streamflow at some lead time in the future. Model-based approaches

5 Introduction: Hydrologic prediction and the NRCS
PNW Snow water content on April 1 SNOTEL Network McLean, D.A., 1948 Western Snow Conf. April to August runoff

6 Results for Winter 2003-04: volume runoff forecasts
UPPER HUMBOLDT RIVER BASIN Streamflow Forecasts - May 1, 2003 <==== Drier === Future Conditions === Wetter ====> Forecast Pt ============ Chance of Exceeding * ===========    Forecast 90% 70% 50% (Most Prob) 30% 10% 30 Yr Avg    Period (1000AF) (% AVG.) MARY'S R nr Deeth, Nv APR-JUL 12.3       18.7       23       59       27       34       39       MAY-JUL 4.5       11.3       16.0       55       21       28       29       LAMOILLE CK nr Lamoille, Nv 13.7       17.4       20       67       26       30       11.6       15.4       18.0       64       24       N F HUMBOLDT R at Devils Gate 5.1       11.0       15.0       44       19.0       25       1.7       7.2       50       14.8       22      

7 Introduction: Hydrologic prediction and ESP
NWS River Forecast Center (RFC) approach: rainfall-runoff modeling (i.e., NWS River Forecast System, Anderson, 1973 offspring of Stanford Watershed Model, Crawford & Linsley, 1966) Ensemble Streamflow Prediction (ESP) used for shorter lead predictions; ~ used for longer lead predictions Currently, some western RFCs and NRCS coordinate their seasonal forecasts, using mostly statistical methods. ICs Spin-up Forecast obs recently observed meteorological data ensemble of met. data to generate forecast ESP forecast hydrologic state

8 Forecast Calibration: Hydrologic Simulation Uncertainty
Simulation error results from: -- parameter uncertainty -- forcing uncertainty -- model physics/structure Techniques for addressing each exist: -- multi-algorithm approaches -- calibration science -- forcing preparation techniques Other approaches for improving simulation: -- data assimilation -- multi-model approaches -- bias-correction

9 Forecast Calibration: Effect of Uncertainty on ESP
Model-based ensemble forecasts contain both “hydrologic uncertainty” (associated with the input data, model parameters & physics) and future climate uncertainty. ESP accounts mostly for the latter, but not the former, hence ESP forecasts have an inherent tendency to be overconfident. One approach that can be used to correct this is called forecast calibration.

10 Forecast Calibration: Overconfidence example

11 Forecast Calibration: Approach
Following a technique suggested by John Schaake for 15-day temperature forecast ensembles: 1. use only forecast ensemble means 2. correlate forecast means with observations 3. reconstruct forecast uncertainty A hindcast dataset is needed for training of the parameters. Also: - correlation - mean and variance of hindcasts and observations

12 Forecast Calibration: hindcast dataset

13 Forecast Calibration: Approach
Algorithm: hindcast long term mean one calibrated forecast mean obs long term mean correlation, obs & hindcast means one forecast mean obs long term std. dev hindcast long term std. dev correlation, obs & hindcast means obs long term variance calibrated forecast variance

14 Forecast Calibration: Results

15 Forecast Calibration: State Dependent Approach

16 Forecast Calibration: Raw ESP

17 Forecast Calibration: Results
calib w/ entire hindcast calib w/ sample size N=35 bias-corr only

18 Forecast Calibration: Reliability Improved

19 Outline Ensemble Forecast Calibration
Synoptic Scale Hydrologic Indices

20 We are currently migrating the daily update methods
UW Real-time Daily Nowcast SM, SWE (RO) ½ degree VIC implementation Free running since last June Uses data feed from NOAA ACIS server “Browsable” Archive, 1915-present Another area of current research relates to the surface water monitor developed last year by A. Wood. This system, applied at coarse (1/2 degree) resolution over the entire CONUS, is completely automated (free-running) and updates every day. It’s just a prototype, demo project that have been unable to get funding to extend, and the main products are maps of current soil moisture & SWE, and an monthly archive that extends back to 1915, that also has SM & SWE maps. Anyway, we are now adapting the daily update approach for use in the westwide forecast system, and should have the first basin (PNW) land surface conditions updating daily (at 1/8 degree) within the month. After that we’ll move on to other basins, and probably extend the 1/8 nowcast eastward to the Mississippi R. We are currently migrating the daily update methods to the west-wide forecast system (1/8 degree)

21 The challenge of changing observing systems
Meteorological stations that still report in real time today 1920s 1990s

22 Surface Water Monitor Archive
March 1997: La Nina conditions bring the highest recorded snowfall to the PNW July 2002: the western U.S. drought centers on Colorado

23 Surface Water Monitor Archive
August 1993: the highest recorded flow on the Mississippi R. March 2002: Virginia experiences severe drought, many well failures

24 Water Year 2005

25

26

27

28 Land Surface Indices Can capture information from PC1 and PC2 using:
NDX1 ~ PC1 = CNTR NDX2 ~ PC2 = NW-SW Then PCs or NDXs can be used in regression framework to predict future flow, e.g., summer runoff

29 Flow prediction results
can we use the modes of variability to predict summer streamflow?

30 Flow prediction results

31 Take away message The dream of a purely physical modeling based prediction system is unlikely to be realized due to uncertainties in data, parameters, physics and so forth. Statistical techniques can work hand in hand with dynamical ones to move prediction applications forward.

32 Forecast Calibration: ESP


Download ppt "Combining statistical and dynamical methods for hydrologic prediction"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google