Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Infrared Satellite Data Assimilation at NCAR

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Infrared Satellite Data Assimilation at NCAR"— Presentation transcript:

1 Infrared Satellite Data Assimilation at NCAR
Tom Auligné, Hui-Chuan Lin, Zhiquan Liu, Hans Huang, Syed Rizvi, Hui Shao, Meral Demirtas, Xin Zhang National Center for Atmospheric Research Work supported by AFWA, NASA, NSF, KMA

2 Outline Introduction to satellite data assimilation at NCAR
Practical issues with AIRS data assimilation Current developments on infrared radiances

3 Introduction: Data assimilation at NCAR
WRF-ARW: Local Area Model (with global version) + TL/ADJ version DART: Ensemble Data Assimilation (EnKF, ETKF, …) (no radiance yet) WRF-Var: Variational Data Assimilation (3DVar, FGAT, 4DVar) + Hybrid system Community support

4 Satellite DA: WRF-Var capabilities
Retrievals (T / Q profiles) SATEM (from AMSU) AIRS retrievals (NASA version 5) GPS Radio Occultation Retrieved refractivity from COSMIC Winds Retrieved winds: polar MODIS, SATOB Active sensors: Quikscat Radiances (BUFR format from NCEP/NRL/AFWA/NESDIS) HIRS from NOAA16, 17, 18 AMSU-A from NOAA15, 16, 18, EOS-Aqua, METOP-2 AMSU-B from NOAA15, 16, 17 MHS from NOAA18, METOP-2 AIRS from EOS-Aqua SSMIS from DMSP16

5 Satellite DA: WRF-Var capabilities
Retrievals (T / Q profiles) SATEM (from AMSU) AIRS retrievals (NASA version 5): NASA-EOS Project to assess impact over Antarctica GPS Radio Occultation Retrieved refractivity from COSMIC Winds Retrieved winds: polar MODIS, SATOB Active sensors: Quikscat Radiances (BUFR format from NCEP/NRL/AFWA/NESDIS) HIRS from NOAA16, 17, 18 AMSU-A from NOAA15, 16, 18, EOS-Aqua, METOP-2 AMSU-B from NOAA15, 16, 17 MHS from NOAA18, METOP-2 AIRS from EOS-Aqua: AFWA Project to incorporate in operational 3DVar SSMIS from DMSP16

6 AIRS Channel Selection: 10hPa model top
Ozone Solar contamination RTTOV (v 8.7) AIRS T Jacobians CRTM (REL-1.1) T Surface O3 Q T

7 Observation Error: Tuning of statistics
NCEP ECMWF NCEP (and most ECMWF) observation errors statistics consistent with innovations Error factor tuning from objective method (Desrozier and Ivanov, 2001) Channel number`

8 Quality Control & Thinning
Pixel-level QC Reject limb observations Reject pixels over land and sea-ice Cloud/Precipitation detection (NESDIS) Synergy with imager (AIRS/VIS-NIR) Channel-level QC Gross check (innovations <15 K) First-guess check (innovations < 3o). Thinning Warmest Field of View Thinning (120km) 345 active data Warmest FoV 696 active data

9 Bias Correction: Static and Variational
Modeling of errors in satellite radiances: Predictors: Offset mb thickness 200-50mb thickness Surface skin temperature Total column water vapor Scan, scan2, scan3 Parameters Cost Function “Offline” bias correction “Variational” bias correction

10 VarBC: Issues with regional models
No Inertia Constraint Inertia Constraint VarBC Timeseries Innovations for AIRS window channel #787 After BC Before BC

11 Parameter estimation: in CRTM & RTTOV
g modulates atmospheric absorption to compensate for: poor knowledge of gas concentrations (CO2, …) errors in definition of ISRF errors in mean absorption coefficient Gamma sensitivity Timeseries of  estimations -1 (%) Analysis cycle

12 Cloud Detection: MMR scheme
AIRS 2378 channels From « hole hunting » (identifying clear pixels)… … to identifying clear channels (insensitive to the cloud). = Radiance calculated in clear sky RTM = Radiance calculated for overcast cloud at level k / Nk3 Nk2 Cloud fractions Nk are ajusted variationally to fit observations. Nk1 Vertical Level No Pixel Channel Number (LW band)

13 Cloud Detection: Initial validation for AIRS
MODIS NASA Level 2 Product AIRS Cloud Detection Cloud Top Pressure (hPa)

14 Current Developments: Cloudy Radiances
Cloud Top Pressure

15 <y-H(xb)> (F/ y) Adjoint of WRF-ARW Forecast
Current Developments: Observation Impact Observation (y) Analysis (xa) Forecast (xf) WRF-VAR Data Assimilation WRF-ARW Forecast Model Define Forecast Accuracy Background (xb) Forecast Accuracy (F) Observation Impact <y-H(xb)> (F/ y) Observation Sensitivity (F/ y) Analysis Sensitivity (F/ xa) Gradient of F (F/ xf) Adjoint of WRF-ARW Forecast TL Model (WRF+) Adjoint of WRF-VAR Data Assimilation Derive Forecast Accuracy Background Sensitivity (F/ xb) STATUS: DONE ONGOING Obs Error Sensitivity (F/ eob) Bias Correction Sensitivity (F/ k) Figure adapted from Liang Xu

16 More plans… AIRS/AMSU (v.5) Retrievals over Antarctica
Collocate with COSMIC retrievals Assess impact in AMPS system AFWA Cloud Analysis Introduce cloud hydrometeors in control variable Study background error covariances for clouds Include cloud microphysics into WRF-ARW TL/ADJ Assess the accuracy/linearity of radiative transfer in cloudy conditions IASI, CrIS

17 Thanks for your attention…


Download ppt "Infrared Satellite Data Assimilation at NCAR"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google