Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

CONCLUSIONS OF DEBATES

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "CONCLUSIONS OF DEBATES"— Presentation transcript:

1 CONCLUSIONS OF DEBATES
OUTLOOK FOR 2012 Vera ROGIERS Dept. of Toxicology, Dermato- Cosmetology and Pharmacognosy Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium

2 CONTENTS  SUMMARY OF POINTS OF INTEREST
 OUTLOOK FOR 2012 AND BEYOND: PERSONAL VIEW

3 CONTENTS  SUMMARY OF POINTS OF INTEREST
 OUTLOOK FOR 2012 AND BEYOND: PERSONAL VIEW

4 EVEIT : EX VIVO EYE IRRITATION TEST
POINTS OF INTEREST EVEIT : EX VIVO EYE IRRITATION TEST EPAA 2010 SCIENCE AWARD REPLACEMENT EYE IRRITATION TEST : TAKEN UP BY INDUSTRY; INTEREST RAISED OF REGULATORY BODIES TASK FOR EPAA FOLLOW-UP : APPLICABILITY DOMAIN LIMITATIONS PREVALIDATION

5 VACCINES : POINTS OF INTEREST
RECOMMENDATIONS MADE BY START-UP (FP7 PROJECT) TAKEN UP BY EPAA VACCINE CONSISTENCY APPROACH : QUALITY CONTROL WITHOUT ANIMAL USE OPPORTUNITY FOR EACH OF THE 3R’S TASK OF EPAA : EXCELLENT DISCUSSION PLATFORM FOR ALL PARTIES INVOLVED (ACADEMIC, INDUSTRY, REGULATORS, ANIMAL PROTECTION) AT EU AND INTERNATIONAL LEVEL

6 epaa “MARKET PLACE” DEMAND SUPPLY TOOLS FOR INNOVATION
POINTS OF INTEREST TOOLS FOR INNOVATION epaa “MARKET PLACE” DEMAND SUPPLY DIALOGUE IN BROADEST SENSE (REGULATORS) RESEARCH: BASIC & TRANSLATIONAL INFORMATION STREAM FROM AND TO ALL PARTIES

7 TOOLS FOR INNOVATION POINTS OF INTEREST
INCORPORATION OF “OMICS” TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION IN CELL CULTURE 3D TECHNOLOGY SCAFFOLD TECHNOLOGY HUMAN CELLS: STEM CELLS/PROGENITORS MINIATURISATION HIGH CONTENT ANALYSIS MONITORING IN SITU, USE OF SENSORS SYSTEMS BIOLOGY, PATHWAY ANALYSIS EPIGENETICS IMPLEMENTATION OF NOVEL STRATEGIES IN RISK ASSESSMENT INCORPORATION OF NEW CONCEPTS : QSAR, PBPK, BIOMARKERS, TTC, QRA, WoE,...

8 ITS : INTEGRATED TESTING STRATEGY
POINTS OF INTEREST ITS : INTEGRATED TESTING STRATEGY INTEGRATION OF IN SILICO, IN VITRO AND IN VIVO METHODS PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY IS POSITIVE, USED IN WoE APPROACH IMPLEMENTATION IN ACTUAL EU LEGISLATION SEEMS POSSIBLE (ECHA, EFSA, EMA, ...) NEED FOR WELL-DEFINED REGULATORY ACCEPTANCE PROCESS NEED FOR QUALITY CRITERIA FOR ITS GENERATED DATA ITS IS KEY PLAYER IN PARADIGM SHIFT FROM PATHOLOGY-BASED TOXICOLOGY TO PATHWAY-BASED RISK ASSESSMENT

9 ITS : INTEGRATED TESTING STRATEGY
POINTS OF INTEREST ITS : INTEGRATED TESTING STRATEGY TO BE ACCEPTED IN REGULATORY COMPLIANCE PROCEDURE : QUALITY CRITERIA BASED ON VALIDATED OR VALID METHODS ? Scientific validity Robustness of methods/endpoints Standardisation of assays/cell preparation Reproducibility of results Endpoints relevant for human risk assessment Risk assessment decisions in case of failure of an individual test Applicability domain Transparent and consistent approach

10 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR WAY FORWARD ? INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION WITHIN :
POINTS OF INTEREST ITS : INTEGRATED TESTING STRATEGY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR WAY FORWARD ? ROLE FOR EPAA : INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION WITHIN : INDUSTRY, ACADEMIA, DIFFERENT EU AND US REGULATORY AGENCIES, ECVAM, OECD, ...

11 DIRECTIVE 2010/63/EU (updated 86/609/EEC)
POINTS OF INTEREST ITS : INTEGRATED TESTING STRATEGY INTERNATIONAL ACCEPTANCE ACTUAL EU LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT : VERTICAL LEGISLATION C H E M I C A L S P R E A T I O N S P L A N T R O T E C I B I O C I D E S F O D A I T V E S M E D I C N A L P R O M E D I C A L V S D E T R G N S C O S M E T I C S DIRECTIVE 2010/63/EU (updated 86/609/EEC) Adapted from Pauwels et Rogiers 2007, Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 49(3),

12 FIRST HARMONISATION WITHIN THE EU ?
POINTS OF INTEREST ITS : INTEGRATED TESTING STRATEGY IN EU: COMPLEX SITUATION COSMETICS : TESTING AND MARKETING BAN 1R → REPLACEMENT “VALIDATED” ALTERNATIVES REACH : 3Rs “SUITABLE” ALTERNATIVES PHARM : ALL POSSIBILITIES ARE OPEN ICH (SLOWLY) INCORPORATING 3Rs “VALID” ALTERNATIVES FIRST HARMONISATION WITHIN THE EU ?

13 CONTENTS  SUMMARY OF POINTS OF INTEREST
 OUTLOOK FOR 2012 AND BEYOND: PERSONAL VIEW

14 OUTLOOK FOR 2012 AND BEYOND : PERSONAL VIEW
Lacking European Parlement in MG meetings 4 START IN 2005 COMMISSIONERS COMMISSION MEMBERS CO-CHAIR INDUSTRY 2 Lacking Director for nearly 1 year 3 Senior decision level ? NEED FOR REFLECTION BY PARTNERS NEED FOR EPAA INTERNAL DISCUSSION ALERT !! EPAA WITH PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP IS EXCELLENT TOOL FOR INTERNATIONAL DISCUSSION AND PROGRESS IN BETTER SCIENCE Not present in person in 2011 1 A SOLID HOUSE (EPAA) WITH STRONG FOUNDATIONS (CO-CHAIRS OF HIERARCHIC LEVEL), A SHELTERING ROOF (TOP COMMISSIONERS), ACTIVE BUILDERS (MEMBERS OF DGs & INDUSTRIES) AND A NICE SURROUNDING (HIGH EP REPRESENTATION)


Download ppt "CONCLUSIONS OF DEBATES"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google