Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Radiometer channel optimization for precipitation remote sensing

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Radiometer channel optimization for precipitation remote sensing"— Presentation transcript:

1 Radiometer channel optimization for precipitation remote sensing
Peter Bauer Emmanuel Moreau Sabatino di Michele Sensitivity Information Content Variational Error Estimation

2 Windows vs. Sounding Channels
Moist Dry 18.7 23.8 36.5 89.0 157.0 50.3+ 118.75

3 1-Dimensional Variational Retrieval
Linear: Non-linear: analysis Jacobian Observation Error Forward model First guess Background Observation R=E+F, calibration/modelling errors: 1 K window channels 0.5 K sounding channel differences uncorrelated unbiased noise-free H, HT tangent-linear/adjoint of radiative transfer model

4 Canadian Snowstorm North Atlantic Front Florida Convection
Signal vs. Noise North Atlantic Front Florida Convection ECMWF 6h-3h Precipitation Forecast on 26/01/2003 [mm]

5 Land Surface Emissivity / Emissivity ‘Error’ (C. Prigent)
1 1 19 GHz 37 GHz 85 GHz 4 4 2 2

6 Signal vs. Noise Radiometer noise comparably low
radiometer noise NET geophysical noise here only TB/  cloud/rain/snow variability H B HT Contributions: NET , surface emissivity , liquid precipitation , solid precipitation  Radiometer noise comparably low Over land with weak rain and snowfall: Only 89, 150 GHz & sounding channels show sensitivity to snow (rain) Over ocean: 18-37, 50 GHz are sensitive to rain, 89, 150 GHz & sounding channels show sensitivity to snow Over land with strong rain and snowfall: 89, 150 GHz & sounding channels show sensitivity to snow, less to rain

7 Channel Optimization, Information Content
Signal to noise can be characterized as x/ or x / with: x atmospheric variable x standard deviation of x’s variability  noise Information content of a measurement = factor of x-knowledge improvement when making observation(s) [often as log (factor)] Linear Gaussian case: Hs = S [P(x)] – S [P(x|y)] Entropy reduction S = Analysis error covariance matrix P = (joint) pdf of x(y) Iterative method for channel optimization: S-1 = B-1 + hhT Improvement of S over B with H B = Background error covariance matrix H = Jacobian matrix with columns h 1. calculate Hs for all channels and select highest 2. update B with S 3. calculate Hs for remaining channels and select highest

8 Channel Optimization Clear-sky absorption spectrum
and protected frequency intervals Clear-sky absorption gradient dk/d [km-1 GHz-1] k [km-1]  [GHz]

9 Information Content Canadian Snowstorm #1 Canadian Snowstorm #2
Florida convection Canadian Snowstorm #1 North Atlantic front Canadian Snowstorm #2 Rain Cloud water Snow GHz Averaged Entropy reduction, ER, over profiles per case

10 1-Dimensional Variational Retrieval Accuracy Estimation
p p q T p p p wr ws wc p p p wr ws wc FG-Departures AN-Departures p p p wr ws wc

11 Retrieval Accuracy: Canadian Snowstorm, area #1
window sounding Rain Snow Cloud water

12 Retrieval Accuracy: Canadian Snowstorm, area #2
window sounding Rain Snow Cloud water

13 Retrieval Accuracy: North Atlantic Front
window sounding Rain Snow Cloud water

14 Retrieval Accuracy: Florida Convection
window sounding Rain Snow Cloud water

15 Retrieval Accuracy: Total
Window channels Sounding channels Rain Snow

16 Summary Variational framework provides an 2* simulator:
- test of modelling/calibration errors on retrievals (also biases); - assessment of required constraints (a priori information, models); - estimation of quantitative retrieval accuracy (systematic & random errors); - large flexibility with respect to cases. (*end-to-end ) M. Masutani (NCEP) NWP-analysis/forecast system (4D-Var) framework provides a simulator for estimating the impact of existing (OSE) and future (OSSE) observations on NWP!


Download ppt "Radiometer channel optimization for precipitation remote sensing"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google