1. 9-12 Smarter Balanced Assessment Update
English Language Arts
February 2012

3. Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Updates
Content Specifications for Summative Assessment of CCSS for ELA & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects
Assess reading for both literary and informational texts
(For percentages of text see p. 5 NAEP charts in the Common Core State
Standards document.)
Attention to reading closely
Attention to reading texts of increasing complexity at all grade levels

4. Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Updates
Assess 3 types of writing considering balance of types across grade levels (For percentages of text see p. 5 NAEP charts in the Common Core State Standards document.)
Narrative
Argumentative (Opinion/Persuasion)
Informative/Explanatory

5. Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Updates
Research and full compositions take longer to complete.
These will be addressed through performance tasks rather than summative tasks.

6. Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Updates
Language Standards: Not a test of vocabulary memorization
Word analysis skills
Close reading
Determining meanings in context
Interpret figurative uses of language

7. A lexile or frequency count is only one consideration when it comes to determining text complexity.
Factors that influence text complexity (Hess & Biggam, 2004)
Word difficulty and language structure
Text structure
Discourse style
Genre and characteristic features of the text
Background knowledge and/or degree of familiarity with content
Level of reasoning required
Format and layout of text
Length of text

8. Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Updates
There are 5 learning outcomes or CLAIMS for the CCSS ELA standards:
Read closely and critically to comprehend a range of increasingly complex literary and informational texts.
Produce effective writing for a range of purposes and audiences
Employ effective speaking and listening skills for a range of purposes and audiences.
Engage appropriately in collaborative and independent inquiry to investigate/research topics, pose questions, and gather and present information.
Skillfully use and interpret written language across a range of literacy tasks.

9. Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Updates
Claim 4 Middle School Example
Collaboratively generate & explore a variety of potential digital and print resources that can be used to respond to a research question or problem.
Collaborative discussions would include considering the credibility of sources and relevance of information to the topic.
Individually, students prepare and present their results to show that they can draw conclusions that integrate or analyze information using data &/or text evidence as support.

10. Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Updates
Claim 4 High School Example
Collaboratively discuss texts, speeches or media messages all of which present different points of view about an issue from a period in history.
Individually, students may be asked to select appropriate sources, then analyze and present information (academic writing/explanation) or critique perspectives/potential biases as they relate to the issue and craft a response (critique/argument).
Responses demonstrate the ability to analyze & synthesize information & evaluate sources (primary, secondary, media…) for credibility, bias, quality of evidence, and/or quality of reasoning.

11. Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Updates
All short research projects will be assessed with extended responses/performance assessments, preferably over two or more days at high school.
Whole group or small group collaboration may be used in the planning phase and (at least initially) be used as formative assesssment evidence.
The summative assessment would be a presentation of learning—with some flexibility of medium used: oral, visual/graphic, written or a combination.
All extended performance tasks will be scored analytically with trained raters and may also include a holistic scoring component.

12. Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Updates
Optional Interim Assessments and Performance Tasks will remain optional and not a part of the reporting to the state.
Will be available to districts at no charge in 2016

13. Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Updates
Districts will be given a 6-8-week window to test students during the last 12 weeks of the year.
Unlike MME students are not tested at the same time, same place.
Allows for flexibility, use of computer labs.

14. Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Updates
Includes grades 3-8 and 11 only.
Districts will use the digital clearinghouse provided by the state to create assessments for 9th-and 10th-grade students. However, those tests must be in place to comply with accountability laws in Michigan.
State hopeful that once consensus is reached on purpose of the SMARTER Balance Interim Tests that the districts may use them.

15. Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Updates
There is the possibility for students to retake the test up to three times.
Districts determine who is retested.
Reasons include sickness, extraneous issues that would be identified by the district.

16. Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Updates
MEAP Science and Social Studies tests will be moved to the spring until new standards are approved and assessments developed.
NRC-developed science standards about 1.5 years from adoption
CCSSO-developed social studies standards about 2 years from adoption
New tests for these areas developed after that time

17. Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Updates
Accommodations for the summative assessments may be different from current practice in Michigan, as all states giving the SMARTER Balance tests must be consistent in providing accommodations. This will be determined after the tests have been developed.

18. Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Updates
While Michigan is an integral part of developing the assessments, the state has not formally approved the tests. It waits for the final development and piloting to see if the system meets our needs.

19. Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Updates
Funding only given for the development of the tests, not for the upkeep and administration of the assessments needed by the school year and beyond.
Sustainability task force has been established and met for first time in December.