1. TC MTS / STF 430 Close Debriefing Report
TTCN language evolution
Presented by Stephan Schulz
© ETSI All rights reserved
Version: 7 December 2012

2. Review of completed STFs
B88(12)030r1: help Board make more informed decisions on future funding requests
Requirement: TB Chairmen to present a few slides on the outcome of the STF, at the Board that follows its conclusion
© ETSI All rights reserved

3. STF Close (GoTo)Meeting
When
After conclusion of the work and approval of deliverables
Who
Reference TB/WG Chairman
STF Leader
STF Manager
Technical Officer
editHelp
EC Relations Officer (EC/EFTA contracts)
CTI Officer (testing STFs)
What
Review STF work
Exchange experience, propose improvement
Prepare “STF Close Debriefing Report”
© ETSI All rights reserved

4. Guidelines for the STF Close Debriefing Report
© ETSI All rights reserved

5. STF / Project summary Subject: TTCN3 language evolution
Objective: handle TTCN-3 CRs, reporting defects / requesting clarifications and requesting new features and implement the solutions in the related ETSI standards. Keep TTCN-3 up to date with standard implementation requirements.
Deliverables: upgrade of TTCN-3 set of standards (revised ES’s)
Related STFs
STF finished: 187, 213, 253, 256, 337, 349, 380, 393, 430
STF in course: 446 (planned ES’s delivery April 2013)
New STF 2013: XG (Board approved, start after publication ES’s STF 446)
Duration: from 2001 to 2013
Total cost : 710 k€ (average 54,6k€/year)
© ETSI All rights reserveG

6. STF summary - experts Experts STF 430 Experts related STFs
Ina Schieferdecker Fraunhofer FOKUS
Jens Grabowski Institut für Informatik
György Réthy Ericsson Hungary
Jacob Wieland Testing Technologies
Experts related STFs
Gyorgy Rethy Ericsson Hungary
Tibor Csöndes Ericsson Hungary
Tamas Kasza Ericsson
Ina Schieferdecker Fraunhofer FOKUS
Sebastian Müller FSCOM
Xiaoming Fu IITB
Zhen Ru Dai IITB
Benjamin Zeiss Institut für Informatik
Jens Grabowski Institut für Informatik
Paul Baker Motorola UK
Frédéric Roudaut Université de Rennes
Colin Willcock Nokia Corporation
Stephan Schulz Nokia Corporation
Stephan Tobies Nokia Corporation
Andreas Ulrich Nokia Siemens
Thomas Deiss Nokia Siemens
Tomas Urban OU Elvior
Steve Randall PQM Consultants
Ekkart Rudolph Techn. Univ. Munich
Johan Nordin TELELOGIC AB
Jacob Wieland Testing Technologies
Claude Martin Actimage
© ETSI All rights reserveG

7. Cost of project Funding overview Total 709 800 EUR
Total EUR
Average €/year
© ETSI All rights reserved

8. Quality of deliverables
All deliverables published ? Yes  No 
8 revised ES’s (CR’s, upgrade)
2 new ES’s (new features)
Quality of deliverables (content):
Added-value of content
Technical consistency
Precision of content
Quality of deliverables (editorial / presentation):
Respect of editing rules
Structure coherence
Clarity /readability
© ETSI All rights reserved

9. Achievements & unresolved issues
Key results achieved with the support of the STF
Results that could not have been achieved without the STF
TTCN-3 language is one of the success stories of ETSI but requires a continuous maintenance and extension process to be aligned with the evolution of the technologies on which it is applied.
This activity requires very specific competence and cannot be effectively completed without the support of an STF.
Results expected when proposing the STF and that have not been achieved: reasons and corrective actions.
© ETSI All rights reserved

10. Impact of deliverables
Where and how the STF deliverables will be used by the industry, market impact, expected benefits
How standards will be developed and maintained, will new STF funding be required ?
© ETSI All rights reserved

11. Innovation aspects
Innovation aspects may be found in the subject of the STF, the techniques / methodologies applied, opening for ETSI in new domains, interest to attract new ETSI Members
© ETSI All rights reserved

12. Overall assessment of the STF
Did the outcome of the STF meet expectations ?
Has the STF been an effective tool to progress the standardization work ?
Following this experience, would you recommend your TB to apply again for STF funding ?
General comments, suggestions for improvement
© ETSI All rights reserved

13. Annex – KPI’s
© ETSI All rights reserved

14. Effectiveness * mark with a cross your assessment for each item (from 1 = poor to 5 = excellent)2 3 4 5
Comments
Achievement of objectives
Respect of time scale
Quality of deliverables
Quality of reporting
Respect of TB guidance
Respect of ETSI editing rules
Respect of ETSI admin. rules
Quality of expert’s team
Support from secretariat
© ETSI All rights reserved

15. Interaction with TB (comments/optional)
Interest of TB delegates and other stakeholders in STF work:
Quantitative (e.g. number of meetings, documents, draft reviews, comments)
Qualitative (e.g. comments, technical contributions, etc.)
Consultation of TB and stakeholders
Initiatives to get directions from Members and other stakeholders
Support from stakeholders
Voluntary / financial contribution, equipment, etc.
Development of related standards:
How the STF work can benefit to the development /quality of other standards
Suggestions to improve involvement of stakeholders
© ETSI All rights reserved

16. Quality of STF team (comments/optional)
Technical competence
Mix of expertise
Teamwork
Commitment
Leadership
Respect of TB guidance
Quality of reporting
Relations with TB delegates and stakeholders
Suggestions for improvement
© ETSI All rights reserved

17. Support from ETSI Secretariat (comments/optional)
Technical Officer support
Liaison with EC/EFTA, stakeholders, etc.
Editing, document processing support
IT services
Project management support
Administrative processes
Logistic support, meeting organization
Suggestions for improvement
© ETSI All rights reserved