1. In the Michigan School Improvement Framework
Public Schools of Petoskey
District TLC Role & Responsibilities
In the Michigan School Improvement Framework

2. MDE’s Vision
Provide a comprehensive framework based on current research and best practice to serve as a road map to support continuous school improvement.

3. School Improvement Framework Coherent Continuous Improvement
NCLB
Title 1
OSI
Ed YES!
Research
School Improvement Framework
Coherent Continuous Improvement
MDE Graphic

4. The District TLC Takes Action
Our School Improvement Team
To Communicate
To Understand
To Target
and CUT to the core for
optimum student outcomes!

5. School Improvement MDE’s 5 STRANDS & 12 Standards
Strand I – TEACHING
for LEARNING
Strand II - LEADERSHIP
Last
Meeting
CURRICULUM
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP
INSTRUCTION
SHARED LEADERSHIP
ASSESSMENT
OPERATIONAL RESOURCE MNGT.
Strand III - PERSONNEL & PROF. LEARNING
Strand IV - SCHOOL/ COMMUNITY RELATIONS
Strand V - DATA & INFORMATION MANAGEMENT
PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS
PARENT/FAMILY INVOLVEMENT
DATA
PROFESSIONAL LEARNING
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT
This Meeting

6. Strand I: Teaching for Learning
Strand I: Teaching for Learning

7. DATA & INFORMATION MANAGEMENT
Today’s Topic
Strand V
DATA & INFORMATION MANAGEMENT
Data- Generation & Collection
- Systemic within the District
- Multiple Data Sources
Information Management
- Analysis
- Decision-Making

8. Types of Data Student Learning Programs & Procedures Perceptions
Demographics

9. DATA: Student Learning
What evidence do we collect?
What shows that students are meeting or exceeding our targets?
How do we know about individual students?

10. The Formal District
Assessment Plan

11. The Informal (Common) PLC Assessments

12. District MEAP/ MME Data
Are we meeting our targets?

27. What can it tell us about trends?
District NWEA Data
What can it tell us about trends?

29. What else do we need to consider?
Other District Data
What else do we need to consider?

30. DATA: Demographics Who are our students?
What trends do we see in our student population?
What outside factors may help us better understand our students?
Are all subgroups learning?

34. How would we use this information?
DATA: Perceptions
How do people feel about our district?
How satisfied are stakeholders?
What are the perceived strengths & weaknesses?
What is the opinion of our graduates?
How would we use this information?

35. How would we use this information?
DATA: Programs
How successful are our programs?
How successful are our procedures?
How aligned and paced is our curriculum?
Do we have the right resources?
How would we use this information?

36. What goals have we already set on our trajectory to 100% proficiency?
DATA: District View
What goals have we already set on our trajectory to 100% proficiency?

37. District Writing Fall of 2010
81% Proficient

38. District Reading Fall of 2010
90% Proficient

39. District Math Fall of 2010
88% Proficient

40. District Science Fall of 2010
91% Proficient

41. District Social Studies Fall of 2010
92% Proficient

42. Data Driven Goals for Our District
What else should we consider?

43. Future Goal Discussions
In Our Spring Meetings
L. Slanec 2009