1. Pronociceptive Pain Modulation in Patients with Painful Chemotherapy-Induced Polyneuropathy 
Hadas Nahman-Averbuch, MSc, David Yarnitsky, MD, PhD, Yelena Granovsky, PhD, Elliot Sprecher, PhD, Mariana Steiner, MD, Tzahala Tzuk-Shina, MD, Dorit Pud, PhD 
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
DOI: /j.jpainsymman
Copyright © 2011 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee Terms and Conditions

2. Fig. 1
Correlations between clinical pain and experimental pain of the entire sample (n=27). Positive correlations were found between clinical pain and the mechanical temporal summation value (a) as well as with the CPM10 effect; (b) max pain=maximum pain intensity during the week before the experimental assessment; CPM10 effect=scorings of the conditioned test stimulus after 10 seconds minus scorings of the baseline test stimulus after 10 seconds.
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management  , DOI: ( /j.jpainsymman )
Copyright © 2011 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee Terms and Conditions

3. Fig. 2
Positive correlation between the mechanical temporal summation value and the CPM10 effect. CPM10 effect=scorings of the conditioned test stimulus after 10 seconds minus scorings of the baseline test stimulus after 10 seconds.
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management  , DOI: ( /j.jpainsymman )
Copyright © 2011 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee Terms and Conditions

4. Fig. 3
CPM effect along the stimulation period in the two patient groups. An interaction was found (P=0.03) between the two groups of patients in CPM time evolution, but no statistical difference was found at post hoc testing. Painful PNP=painful polyneuropathy patients; nonpainful PNP=nonpainful polyneuropathy patients.
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management  , DOI: ( /j.jpainsymman )
Copyright © 2011 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee Terms and Conditions