Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDénes Szőke Modified over 6 years ago
1
Integrated tool set for electro-thermal evaluation of ICs
Pultronics Inc.
2
Outline Introduction Pultronics approach Algorithm description
Test results Conclusion
3
Increasing heat flux Heat flux exceeding 10 W/cm2 High temperatures
Failure rate doubles approx. every 10oC origin of the problem
4
Impact on expected performances
Device mismatch thermal offset signal level mismatch decreased noise margin Thermally induced signal delay Reliability electro-migration Solution -> electro-thermal analysis consequences of non adressing the problem
5
Previous work Thermal solvers [Wuns97]
6
Thermal solvers
7
History Fukahori, coupled set of electro-thermal equations to model device Smith, temperature distribution for GaAs FETs, analytical solution Lee, Allstot, electro-thermal simulation, FDM, relaxation Petegem, relaxation, FEM Szekely, direct coupling, Fourier series Szekely, electro-thermal and logi-thermal Wunsche, relaxation, FEM, transient analysis
8
TED characteristics integration within design framework
r/w access to design database efficient electro-thermal analysis sufficiently precise fast (thermal, electro-thermal) robust in memory usage automated modular and extensible
9
Used approach Simulator coupling Analytical solution
smaller circuit, lower node count, memory efficient, faster simulation time Analytical solution fastest and sufficiently precise One extraction, one netlist No changes to the device model, no additional masks for extraction R/W Access to design database
10
Electro-thermal loop / Flowchart
dual netlist circuit simulator thermal solver Y begin initialize circuit simulator initialize thermal power update Temperature update converges Assign new temperatures N
11
Thermal algorithm Steady state heat conduction
Solution for point heat source
12
Thermal algorithm Kirhoff’s integral transformation to accommodate k=f(T) Back transform
13
Thermal algorithm Additional features modeled metal interconnects
substrate depth boundary conditions element grouping
14
Verification against FEM solver Device thermal model
GaAs substrate temperature dependent conductivity 50x0.6mm DFET device only no metal 50 mW dissipation boundary conditions forced 50oC on the bottom side and top walls non conducting 50 oC 3D model constructed for FEM solver (FlexPDTM) 5-20k nodes mesh 10min+ execution time, PC, PentiumII
15
Mutual heating, 2 DFETs, 30mm spaced
Superposition of thermal effects Dangerous when clustering dissipating devices
16
Temperature distribution in presence of metal interconnects
1 FET with metal 50 oC Thermal conductivity device-metal important heat flux through metal path Over-estimated temperatures if not modeled new model required
17
New method versus full 3D
Result- very good match Tmax = 98.5 oC Tmax = 95.8 oC Full device Pultronics model
18
Examples Bi-directional buffer, 0.6mm GaAs
19
Bi-directional buffer
650 devices transient analysis 3 iterations (max temperature 144, 65.5, 68 oC) thermal analysis - 1 to 10 sec / iteration HspiceTM min / iteration
20
Calculated thermal map
Different boundary conditions defined for NW and SE
21
GaAs, operational amplifier
operational amplifier, GaAs different temperatures for parallel devices self-heating model not sufficient Output stage
22
Thermally induced offset
Constant T Operational amplifier, GaAs local temperature raise (output stage) device mismatch offset voltage Updated T
23
Major contribution Development of global methodology allowing practical steady-state electro-thermal analysis of large integrated circuits within much shorter execution time than existing one applicable for very large circuits Development of algorithms necessary to implement the methodology Development of algorithm allowing thermal modeling of integrated circuits with metal interconnections Electro-thermal evaluation of chosen circuits (HBT, GaAs)
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.