1. What is the difference between a cabbage and a machine?
What would Paley say and why? Discuss in pairs.

2. Challenge to the teleological argument from Hume

3. Learning Outcomes
To be able to describe Hume’s criticisms of the teleological argument.
To be able to evaluate Hume’s criticisms of the teleological argument.

4. Hume and the Teleological Argument
Don’t get confused …
Hume puts forward a version of the Teleological Argument in Dialogues on Natural Religion through a character called Cleanthes …
AND he criticises it via Philo.
Although his main aim is criticism, he actually puts forward a good version of the argument first, which can be used in exams.

5. Hume’s Dialogues on Natural Religion
‘You will find nothing but one great machine’ Complete the worksheet on what his character Cleanthes says. What did mean?

6. Hume’s Teleological Argument
Cleanthes compares the world to a MACHINE, divided up into many smaller machines.
He does this because all the parts are ORDERED and fit together, and the whole thing has a PURPOSE.
Cleanthes claims that the ‘author of nature’ must be like the mind of man, only much greater, because the design of the world is so much greater than man-made machines!
= Proportionality

7. Hume’s criticisms
Similar effects do not necessarily imply similar causes. Humans don’t have enough knowledge or experience to conclude there is a designer. You cannot leap from the fact that there is human design to the fact there is a world design.
Even if the Teleological Argument worked, we can’t conclude that the Christian God exists.
It is like seeing one side of a pair of scales, where you know the other side is heavier, but you cannot say HOW heavy.

8. (unless you accept the design argument!)
What we CAN’T say!
If the argument works, we get an intelligent designer – a ‘cosmic architect’. We CAN’T tell if he is good, perfect, if there is one god or many … or even if he created the world. Hume says it implies that the world implies a non moral God as there is evil in the world. Hume argues that it could be the work of several gods or an apprentice deity.
Hume claimed that the universe is not like a machine but more like something organic, like a vegetable…. Which does not have a designer.
(unless you accept the design argument!)

9. Rank the arguments in order of how convincing they are.
Hume’s argument cards
Rank the arguments in order of how convincing they are.
This is a world of many faults, so it may actually be a prototype of a lesser god. Plus, if you think that God has infinite power then who knows what he can do, this world may not be the perfect world we think it is.
To discuss the start of the universe in human terms not acceptable, because God is transcendent. Paley’s analogy would suggest that it is more possible to think that the universe was made by more than one god, because there is more than one watchmaker.
Comparing God and the universe to mechanical devices not valid. He said that it would be better to draw analogies between organic things, rather than using mechanical things.
Humans don’t have proper knowledge of creation to conclude that there was only one designer. We only know about things we create.
Because there is evil in the world, maybe the creator isn’t the all-loving God of classical theism?

10. Evaluate the Teleological Argument for God.
Create a Zig-Zag with for and against reasons.
For
Against
Stretch yourself:
Find out what these thinkers thought:
Mill
Darwin
Stretch yourself:
Add your own personal opinion and give reasons.
For
Against

11. Consider…
Answer this question in your notes: ‘Hume said that the reason plants and animals appear to be well adjusted to their environment is because those that didn’t died out’. How does this link to Darwin? Explain your answer in your notes.

12. What is the difference between a cabbage and a machine?
What would Hume say and why? Discuss in pairs.