1. CCPM (Cluster coordination performance monitoring) results
FSAC Afghanistan
CCPM (Cluster coordination performance monitoring) results
1-November-2017

2. What is CCPM?
CCPM is cluster coordination performance monitoring survey conducted by global food security cluster every year to see how clusters are performing in the country. How they Do It: They directly share online survey with national and international NGO’s, government, donors and embassies to respond on performance indicators. (6 core functions including AAP and 15 indicators) On which scale: Performance rated in % by each partners concluded on four qualitative scales.

3. 29 55 53% 12 22% 8 15% 1 2% 3 5% 2 4% 100% Response rate on survey
Partner type
Number partners responding
Total number of partners
Response rate (%)
International NGOs 29 55
53%
National NGOs 12
22%
UN organizations 8
15%
National authority 1 2%
Donors 3 5%
Others 2 4%
Total
100%

4. Unsatisfactory (26% to 50%)
FSAC Performance Matrix (last 4 years)
Year
Weak
(below 25%)
Unsatisfactory (26% to 50%)
Satisfactory (51% to 75%)
Good
(above 75%)
2014 3 2 7 1
2015 5
2016 8 4
2017 11

5. 1. Supporting service delivery
Performance Indicators
Score
Providing a platform that ensures service delivery (Food, agriculture, livestock protection assistance) is driven by the Humanitarian Response Plan and strategic priorities
90%
Developing mechanisms to eliminate duplication of service delivery (response)
88%
Overall (Supporting service delivery)

6. 2. Informing strategic decisions of the HC/HCT
Performance Indicators
Score
Preparing needs assessments and analysis of gaps (across and within Clusters, using information management tools as needed) to inform the setting of priorities
86%
Identifying and finding solutions for (emerging) gaps, obstacles, duplication and cross-cutting issues
73%
Formulating priorities on the basis of analysis 
100%
Overall (Informing strategic decisions of the HC/HCT)
76%

7. 3. Planning and implementing Cluster strategies
Performance Indicators
Score
Developing sectoral plans, objectives and indicators that directly support realization of the overall response's strategic objectives
71%
Applying and adhering to common standards and guidelines
92%
Clarifying funding requirements, helping to set priorities, and agreeing Cluster contributions to the HC's overall humanitarian funding proposals
75%
Overall (Planning and implementing Cluster strategies)
72%

8. 4. Monitoring and evaluating performance
Score
Overall (Monitoring and evaluating performance)
80%
5. Building national capacity in preparedness and contingency planning
Score
Overall (Building national capacity in preparedness and contingency planning)
79%
6. Advocacy
Score
Overall (Advocacy)
81%
7. Accountability to affected populations
Score
Overall (Accountability to affected populations)
94%

9. Recommendation by partners to enhance performance
Disability is not priority issue in Clusters meeting . It is the development and humanitarian mainstream issue.
Strengthen field cluster coordination and regional gap analysis.
Strategies should also be discussed at regional coordination level not only at national level.
Cluster can have a technical working group on livelihoods. 2. Online web library for reference can be created to cluster members 3. Important points from other cluster deliberations can be shared in FSAC