Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Observation and measurement of HW+W-
2
Part 1: INTRODUCTION
3
Contents Introduction Analysis overview
Data samples and reconstruction Event selection Signal processes Background processes Fit procedure and uncertainties Yields and distributions Results and interpretations Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 Part 5 This is a paper of 73 pages/~90 editors!
4
Introduction Motivation of the work Review of current status
Production channels Overview of the results Paper structure
5
Analysis Overview : major background
6
Analysis Strategy: Categorization
Discriminating variables (BDT for VBF, MT for ggF)
7
Part 2: Detector and samples
8
大型强子对撞机(LHC) 位于欧洲核子研究中心(CERN) 周长27km,跨越瑞士法国国境,总投资40亿美元
日内瓦湖 Large Hadron Collider 机场 CMS ATLAS LHCb ALICE 大型强子对撞机(LHC) 位于欧洲核子研究中心(CERN) LHC time line : 1992 : expressions of interest : LHC TDR published : first pp collisons at CME=900 GeV 2010.2: first pp collisions at CME=7 TeV 2011: CMS and ATLAS recorded ~5/fb of data 2012: CMS and ATLAS ~20/fb at CME=8 TeV 2015 – 2018 data-taking at CME = 13 TeV m 周长27km,跨越瑞士法国国境,总投资40亿美元 世界能量最高最大的加速器,设计质心系能量14TeV(14x1012eV) 8 8 8
9
Length: ~ 46 m Radius : ~ 12 m Weight : ~ 7000 tons Channels: ~ 108
Muon spectrometer air-core toroids, MDT+RPC+TGC+CSC s/pT ~ 2-7 % |h| < 2.7, |h|<2.5 ( precision phys.) Length: ~ 46 m Radius : ~ 12 m Weight : ~ 7000 tons Channels: ~ 108 Lcable: ~ 3000 km Cost: 541M CHF EM Calorimetry Pb-LAr s/E ~ 10%/√E(GeV)1% |h|<3.2, |h| < 2.5 (fine granularity) Inner detector (B=2 T) Si pixels and strips Transition Radiation Detector (e/ separation) s/pT ~ 0.05% pT(GeV)0.1%; |h| < 2.5, B=2 T(central solenoid) Hadron Calorimeter Fe/scintillator (central), Cu/W-LAr (fwd) s/E ~ 50%/√E(GeV)3% ||<3
10
ATLAS TDAQ
11
Detector and data samples
Coordinate system Trigger Data: 2011, 7 TeV 4.5fb-1, 2012, 8 TeV, 20.3 fb-1 Reconstruction Vertex / Electron/ Muon /lepton isolation/ Jet / b- tagging / MET (METrel) pTMiss, pTMiss(track)
12
MC simulations
13
Part 3: Event selection
14
Event selection : Initial sample
Initial sample: pT1>22 GeV, pT2>10 GeV, Opposite charge, no 3rd lepton(with pT>10 GeV), vertex, trigger. 𝑒𝜇 channel: 1.33*105 events, expect 800 signal events) , sqrt(1.33E+5) = 365. 𝑒𝑒/𝜇𝜇 channel: 1.6*107 events
15
DISCUSSION Mar 23 Why 𝑠/ 𝐵 , not 𝑠/√(𝑆+𝐵) ? (see page 14)
Definition of METrel
16
JVF
17
Event selection
18
Distributions after preselection
19
Discriminating variables of nj=0
20
Discriminating variables for nj=1
21
Discriminant variable for nj=2(VBF)
22
nj=2, ggF
23
Cut-flow : nj=0
24
Cut flow: nj = 1
25
Cut-flow(nj>=2, VBF)
26
BDT analysis for VBF
27
Cut-flow nj>=2, ggF
28
mT : fitting variable
29
BDT output: fitting variable
30
Kinematics in Signal regions(1)
31
Kinematics in Signal region(2)
32
Event display
33
Are we done yet?
34
Part 4: Signal and Background
35
Signal processes Theory
Cross sections at NNLO in QCD, NLO in EWK. (10% uncert) ggF: resummation to NNLL. BR(HW+W- ) =22% (4.2% relative uncertainty)
36
Signal processes Theory
Cross sections at NNLO in QCD, NLO in EWK. (10% uncert) ggF: resummation to NNLL. BR(HW+W- ) =22% (4.2% relative uncertainty)
37
Background processes WW Top Mis-identified leptons (Wj + jj)
Other dibosons Example: nj=0 SR 𝑀 𝑙𝑙 <55 GeV , ∆𝜑(𝑙𝑙) < 1.8 WW CR 55< 𝑀 𝑙𝑙 <110 GeV, ∆𝜑(𝑙𝑙) < 2.6
39
WW CR SR (nj <= 1) nj<=1 : CR – SR 𝑀 𝑙𝑙 extrapolation
Selected with 𝑒𝜇 events 𝑝 𝑇 𝑙2 >15 GeV nj=0: 𝑝 𝑇 𝑙𝑙 >30 GeV, ∆𝜑 𝑙𝑙 >2.6, 55< 𝑀 𝑙𝑙 <110 GeV nj=1: 𝑚 𝑇 𝑙 >50 GeV, 𝑀 𝑙𝑙 > 80 GeV
40
Systematic uncertainties
WW CR SR (nj <= 1) Systematic uncertainties nj<=1 : CR SR 𝑀 𝑙𝑙 extrapolation
41
WW MC (nj>=2) nj>=2: SHERPA MC, normalized with MCFM(large top-quark contribution, CR difficult to define for WW) Validation region: MT>100 GeV, MT2>160 GeV Data/MC ratio in validation region:
42
Top quarks (nj=0) nj=0: CR= preselection, 𝑒𝜇 channel, ∆𝜑(𝑙𝑙) <2.8, any nj Purity : 74% Correction to the “extrapolation factor” alpha determined with 1 b-tag CR:1.006 Total uncertainty: 8%
43
Top quarks (nj=1) CR: preselection, 𝑒𝜇 channel only, exactly 1 jet (b- tagged) MTl > 50 GeV Extrapolating from 1-btag to 0-btag Total uncertainty: 5%
44
Top quarks (VBF: nj >=2 )
CR: exactly 1 b-tag. BDT analysis, ttbar MC modeling systematics
45
Top quarks (ggF, njet>=2)
Defined with 𝑀 𝑙𝑙 >80 GeV (70% purity) Uncertainty on the extrapolation factor < 4%
46
Fake lepton: W+j CR: one lepton “anti-identified”.
Extrapolation factor: measured from Z+jets Background famine in “identified lepton” at high pT
47
Misid extrapolation factor
48
Multi-jet CR: two anti-identified leptons
Fake factor measured with multi-jet sample, applied twice. ARE WE DOULE COUNTING multi-jet?
49
Other dibosons 𝑊𝛾,𝑊𝑍/ 𝛾 ∗ , 𝑍𝑍 (10% of total background, same magnitude as the signal) 𝑒𝜇 channel: same sign CR for normalization 𝑒𝑒/𝜇𝜇: MC for both normalization and shape Validation : Electron with no b-layer hit to catch 𝑊𝛾(photon conversion also studied with 𝑍→𝜇𝜇𝛾) 𝑊𝑍/ 𝛾 ∗ Validation : 𝑒𝜐𝜇𝜇, 𝑀 𝜇𝜇 < 7 GeV, pTmiss > 20 GeV
50
Same sign CR
51
𝑊𝛾,𝑊𝑍/ 𝛾 ∗ validation
52
Drell Yan : Z𝜏𝜏 CRs nj=0: 𝑀 𝑙𝑙 <90 GeV, ∆𝜑(𝑙𝑙) >2.8, purity:91%
nj=1: 𝑀 𝑙𝑙 <80 GeV, 𝑀 𝜏𝜏 > (mZ-25 GeV) (collinear approximation), purity: 80% nj>=2 ggF: 𝑀 𝑙𝑙 <70 GeV, ∆𝜑(𝑙𝑙) >2.8 purity 74% nj>=2 VBF: 𝑀 𝑙𝑙 <80 GeV (75 for 𝑒𝑒/𝜇𝜇 ) , | 𝑀 𝜏𝜏 – mZ|<25 GeV
53
Drell Yan CR
54
DY 𝑒𝑒/𝜇𝜇 in nj<=1 Matrix method using frecoil cut : uncertainty ~ 50%
55
DY 𝑒𝑒/𝜇𝜇in nj>=2 VBF ABCD method using pTmiss and 𝑀 𝑙𝑙
56
Summary of CRs
57
Summary of corrections from CR
Are we done yet?
58
Part 5: Fit and results
59
Fit regions : SR
62
Likelihood function, and LLR
63
Uncertainty on signal
64
Uncertainty on background
65
Post-fit uncertainties (%)
66
Checks of the fit (ranking plot)
67
Post-fit yields
68
Post-fit MT (nj=0/1 𝑒𝜇 )
69
Post-fit MT nj=0,1 𝑒𝑒/𝜇𝜇
70
Post-fit MT (nj>=2 ggF VBF Cross-Check)
71
VBF (BDT analysis)
72
Observation!
73
Signal strength
74
Mass and signal strength
75
Ratio of VBF/ggF signal strengths
76
Signal strengths
77
Uncertainties
78
“Exclusion plot”
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.