Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Volume 69, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Volume 69, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)"— Presentation transcript:

1 Volume 69, Issue 5, Pages 927-933 (March 2006)
Peritoneal transport assessment by peritoneal equilibration test with 3.86% glucose: A long-term prospective evaluation  V. La Milia, P. Pozzoni, G. Virga, M. Crepaldi, L. Del Vecchio, S. Andrulli, F. Locatelli  Kidney International  Volume 69, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006) DOI: /sj.ki Copyright © 2006 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

2 Figure 1 Flow chart of patients during the study. ‘Still on PD’ patients indicate those who were still on PD therapy at the end of the follow-up. Data are expressed as means±s.d. or as median with inter-quartile range within brackets. Kidney International  , DOI: ( /sj.ki ) Copyright © 2006 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

3 Figure 2 Changes of peritoneal transport characteristics in patients with at least two 3.86%-PETs (two PETs) (n=62), at least three 3.86%-PETs (three PETs) (n=42), at least four 3.86%-PETs (four PETs) (n=20), and at least five 3.86%-PETs (five PETs) (n=11). UF: two PETs P=0.671; three PETs P=0.014; four PETs P=0.012; five PETs P= D/D0: two PETs P=0.464; three PETs P=0.705; four PETs P=0.589; five PETs P= D/PCreat: two PETs P=0.043; three PETs P=0.142; four PETs P=0.241; five PETs P= ΔDNa: two PETs P<0.001; three PETs P<0.001; four PETs P<0.001; five PETs P= Data are expressed as means±s.e. See Tables 1 and 2 for abbreviations. Kidney International  , DOI: ( /sj.ki ) Copyright © 2006 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

4 Figure 3 Kaplan–Meier curve of proportion of patients with and without UF failure during the follow-up (n=95). Kidney International  , DOI: ( /sj.ki ) Copyright © 2006 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

5 Figure 4 Changes of peritoneal transport characteristics between the first and the last PET in patients with (UFF) and without (UFN) UF failure (n=60). Data are shown as means±standard error *P=0.575 vs first PET; *P<0.001 vs UFF; **P<0.001 vs first PET. §P=0.883 vs first PET; §P=0.014 vs UFF; §§P=0.031 vs first PET. °P=0.736 vs first PET; °P=0.046 vs UFF; °°P=0.014 vs first PET. #P<0.001 vs first PET; #P=0.005 vs UFF; ##P=0.006 vs first PET. See Tables 1 and 2 for abbreviations. Kidney International  , DOI: ( /sj.ki ) Copyright © 2006 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions


Download ppt "Volume 69, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google