1. Sierra Company METL Assessment
28 April 2018

2. Overall Assessment Last Year This Year Academic T P Military
Moral-Ethical
Physical Fitness

3. Academic Assessment P Strengths Strong company academic advisor
No major disruptions during ESP throughout all 4 classes
Availability of advisors and officers for help
Reduction in class absences from previous year

4. Academic Assessment - Weaknesses
6 academically deficient cadets
4 cadets with excessive class absences
Cadets in academic danger could be counseled better
3rd overall in 5th Battalion
Spring semester midterm GPA of 2.57 ranking 13/21
Video games and Netflix during ESP

5. Class Absences/GPA Cum GPA last year Cum GPA this year
Cum GPA last year
Cum GPA this year
Class Absences last year
Class Absences this year
Number Academically Deficient last year
Number Academically Deficient this year 1C
2.774
3.097
148 
 31 1 2C
2.992
3.265
 81
 60 3C
3.18
2.739
 92
 82 2 4C
2.703
2.837
 50 38 3
Total
2.912
2.937
350
221 6

6. Academic Pillar Strategy
Setting an environment for academic success
Rotation of leadership checking on squads/platoons during ESP
Find ways to help cadets learn and use effective study habits
Using academic NCO to track cadets that use ASC/utilizing study groups
Academic standing vs. special leave

7. Military Assessment P Strengths Weaknesses
Cadets held accountable for actions
Communication with Co TAC and BAT TAC NCO
Overall respect for COC
Weaknesses
MRIs
General laxity during parade practice
4 parades in 10 (8, 10, 7, 8)

8. Military Assessment Avg parade results last year
Avg parade results this year
Class I Offenses last year
Class I Offenses this year
Suitability Boards last year
Suitability Boards this year 1C 12 13 1 2C 3C 3 4C
Total 2 4

9. Military Pillar Strategy
PSGs and squad leaders holding people accountable
Communication and relationship with Co TAC and BN TAC NCO
CAS accountability

10. Moral-Ethical Assessment
Strengths
Honor Code taken seriously
Tolerant culture for gender acceptance
Weaknesses
Failure to report ongoing issues (i.e. alcohol)

11. Moral-Ethical Assessment
Number of honor accusations last year
Number of honor accusations this year
Number of “in violation” honor findings last year
Number of “in violation” honor findings this year
Number of sexual harassment/
assault incident reports last year
assault incident reports this year 1C 1 2C 3C 2 4C
Total 4 3 0*
1**
* One resigned in lieu of trial
**Cadet was BT’d into Sierra

12. Moral-Ethical Pillar Strategy
Maintain Honor Code training, awareness and emphasis
Understanding of toleration of offenses
Cadet need to come forward with issues instead of allowing them to continue (tobacco, alcohol, etc)

13. Physical Effectiveness Assessment
Strengths
Participation in Regimental PT
Platoon Runs
Giving leadership opportunities during PT
Ex PL, SL, CPL’s
Weaknesses
Intramurals
Attitude of a few bringing down attitude as a whole

14. Physical Effectiveness Assessment
CPFT avg last year
CPFT avg this Semester
Number of CPFT failures last year
Number of CPFT failures this year
Number of H & W failures last year
Number of H & W failures this year 1C
229
230 2 1 2C
256
248 3C
236 3 4C
245
244
Total
239.2 6

15. Physical Effectiveness Pillar Strategy
Allowing more leadership involvement in PT
Encouraging PSGs and squad leaders to run PT
Platoon and squad lead runs
Discretion of PSGs or squad leader

16. Company Commander/TAC Comments
Co Cdr Comments:
Morale hurt by leadership failure 2d Semester
Leaders lacked moral courage in the barracks
More dedicated time during re-constitution period for emphasizing Four-Pillar standards
More cadet-to-cadet (C2C) written counseling as a training tool
TAC Comments:
Cadre was well-trained, and well-executed
Current Co Cdr turned morale around leading by example
Knowing the company’s culture and leaders was a factor in the speed in which he was able to do this
PT improvement is a key indicator of his impact
Leadership next year will face similar challenges