Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published bySimo Katajakoski Modified over 6 years ago
1
T2KK (without reactor) solves 8-fold degeneracy
Hisakazu Minakata Tokyo Metropolitan University
2
日韓新時代: We are having new relationship #2
Congratulations for engagement! July 13-14, 2006 2nd Korean detector WS
3
n oscillation has been seen!
SK MINOS KamLAND July 13-14, 2006 2nd Korean detector WS K2K
4
Seduction to complete understanding
July 13-14, 2006 2nd Korean detector WS
5
Exploring the MNS matrix
na=Uai ni Atm + accel n => <= solar + reactor n SK atm solar+KamLAND July 13-14, 2006 2nd Korean detector WS
6
mass hierarchy & absolute mass scale
Normal Inverted July 13-14, 2006 2nd Korean detector WS
7
T2KK; Tokai-to-Kamioka-Korea identical two detector complex
New message today ! Ishitsuka et al. 05 T2KK (without reactor) solves 8-fold parameter degeneracy Copyright: Okamura et al. July 13-14, 2006 2nd Korean detector WS
8
Current design of Hyper-Kamiokande contains 2 tanks !
Why don’t you bring one of the 2 tanks to Korea? July 13-14, 2006 2nd Korean detector WS
9
Degeneracy; a notorious obstacle
July 13-14, 2006 2nd Korean detector WS
10
A machinery in my talk Oscillation probability draw ellipse if plotted in bi-P plane Role played by CP phase and the matter clearly distinguished Art work by Adam Para Two solutions of S232 x MN JHEP01 July 13-14, 2006 2nd Korean detector WS
11
Cause of the degeneracy; easy to understand
You can draw two ellipses from a point in P-Pbar space Intrinsic degeneracy Doubled by the unknown sign of m2 4-fold degeneracy July 13-14, 2006 2nd Korean detector WS
12
23 octant degeneracy Pe= sin2213 x s223 Solar m2 on
OY Nufact03 Pe= sin2213 x s223 Solar m2 on Matter effect on Altogether, 2 x 2 x 2 = 8-fold degeneracy July 13-14, 2006 2nd Korean detector WS
13
Structure of intrinsic & sign-m2 degeneracy in (matter) perturbative regime
Intrinsic degeneracy; sign(m2)- degeneracy arises because P is approx. invariant under: m m2 T2K II MN JHEP01 July 13-14, 2006 2nd Korean detector WS
14
Let us resolve them one by one; intrinsic degeneracy
July 13-14, 2006 2nd Korean detector WS
15
Expected signal, BG and 2
Kajita in NOVE2006 signal Expected signal, BG and 2 BG 4yrs n + 4yrs anti-n sin22q13=0.1, d=p/2 n and anti-n × Kamioka and Korea 5 energy bins syst. Errors: 5% BG (overall) 5% BG (energy dep.) 5% signal efficiency July 13-14, 2006 2nd Korean detector WS
16
Spectral information solves intrinsic degeneracy
from 1000 page Ishitsuka file T2K T2KK 2 detector method powerful! SK momentum resolution ~30 MeV at 1 GeV July 13-14, 2006 2nd Korean detector WS
17
Sign-m2 degeneracy; the difficult one
July 13-14, 2006 2nd Korean detector WS
18
Sign-m2 degeneracy Resolution of sign-m2 degeneracy requires the matter effect Requires baseline ~1000 km 2nd detector seems required to go down to sin2213=.02 July 13-14, 2006 2nd Korean detector WS
19
T2K(0.54 Mt) vs. T2KK(0.27+0.27 Mt) July 13-14, 2006
2nd Korean detector WS
20
It is not quite only the matter effect
T2KK Korea only With the same input parameter and Korean detector of 0.54 Mt the sign-m2 degeneracy is NOT completely resolved 2 identical detector method powerful ! July 13-14, 2006 2nd Korean detector WS
21
T2KK can resolve mass hierarchy with bonus of better CP sensitivity at large 13
thick: 3, thin: 2 July 13-14, 2006 2nd Korean detector WS
22
Sensitive to because energy dependence is far more dynamic in 2nd oscillation maximum
July 13-14, 2006 2nd Korean detector WS
23
Why so much care for 23 degeneracy?
July 13-14, 2006 2nd Korean detector WS
24
<-> symmetry for maximal 23 and small 13 ?
If symmetry is the case … near maximal 23 small 13 In Z2 case, deviation from max 23 > 13 Grimus et al, Ma, Valle … (many many references) July 13-14, 2006 2nd Korean detector WS
25
How to solve 23 octant degeneracy
Strategy: Look for terms which depend on 23 but not through the form s232 x sin2213 Detect solar m2 term ~c232 Requires very long baseline well controlled systematic error plus statistics Powerful at small 13 Combining reactor measurement of 13 Requires great precision in reactor 13 measurement Powerful at large 13 July 13-14, 2006 2nd Korean detector WS
26
T2KK solves 23 degeneracy!
July 13-14, 2006 2nd Korean detector WS
27
Solar and atm. terms differ in energy dependences
All different in energy dependences ! July 13-14, 2006 2nd Korean detector WS
28
T2KK in-situ solves 23 octant degeneracy
Kajita et al. to appear See Nakayama-san’s talk for more details From Nakayama file July 13-14, 2006 2nd Korean detector WS
29
Atm ; powerful way for octant degene. T.Kajita@NNN05
July 13-14, 2006 2nd Korean detector WS
30
Reactor + accelerator method
MSYIS 02 Acc-disappearance => s223=0.4 or 0.6 Acc-appearance => s223sin2213 = 0.06 Reactor => sin2213 = 0.1 Solves 23 degeneracy July 13-14, 2006 2nd Korean detector WS
31
Region of resolved 23 degeneracy
T2K II (4MW+HK) + phase II type reactor Hiraide et al. (7 samurai) July 13-14, 2006 2nd Korean detector WS
32
Decoupling between degeneracies
Suppose that you succeeded to solve the particular degeneracy, by forgetting about the remaining ones It does NOT necessarily mean that the problem is solved You have to verify that your treatment of degeneracy A is valid irrespective of the presence of degeneracy B One solution: decoupling between the degeneracies July 13-14, 2006 2nd Korean detector WS
33
23 and sign-m2 degeneracy decouple
For example, one can show, to first order in matter effect, the followings: P(octant) = P(1st octant) - P(2nd) is invariant under the interchange of two sign-m2 degenerate pair P(hierarchy) = P(m2 +) - P(m2 -) is invariant under the interchange of two 23 octant degenerate pair in T2K or T2KK setting, the intrinsic degeneracy is resolved by spectrum analysis decouple from the game July 13-14, 2006 2nd Korean detector WS
34
In a nutshell, 8 fold degeneracy can be resolved by T2KK because ..
intrinsic degeneracy is resolved by spectrum information sign-m2 degeneracy is solved with matter effect + 2 identical detector comparison 23 octant degeneracy is solved by identifying the solar oscillation effect in T2KK July 13-14, 2006 2nd Korean detector WS
35
Conclusion With T2KK setting, we have formulated a concrete strategy for resolving 8 fold parameter degeneracy in situ with consistency maintained by “decoupling” conventional superbeam can do it ! July 13-14, 2006 2nd Korean detector WS
36
Supplementary slides July 13-14, 2006 2nd Korean detector WS
37
T2KK vs. NOA; mass hierarchy
thick: 3, thin: 2 NOA: hep-ex/ T2K II July 13-14, 2006 2nd Korean detector WS
38
T2KK vs. NOA; CP NOA II: hep-ex/0503053 thick: 3 thin: 2
July 13-14, 2006 2nd Korean detector WS
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.