Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Figure 1 EPA-Identified Shortfalls for Three Non-Attainment Areas Compared to Estimated Emission Reductions (in tons per day) 11
2
Figure 2 Aggregate Estimated Reductions from Six OTC Model Rules in 2005 Compared to EPA-Identified Shortfalls (in tons per day) 12
3
OTC Severe Ozone Non-Attainment Areas and Expected VOC
Figure 3 OTC Severe Ozone Non-Attainment Areas and Expected VOC Model Rule Reductions (tons per day) 100 Km Analysis denoted in shaded areas 13
4
Table 1 County Assignments for Analyzing Emission Reduction Benefits within 100 KM of Non-Attainment Areas Baltimore Nonattainment Area Virginia Maryland District of Columbia Arlington Calvert Fairfax Charles Loudoun Frederick Prince William Montgomery Stafford Prince Georges St. Mary’s Washington Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton Nonattainment Area Maryland Delaware Pennsylvania New Jersey ___ Caroline Sussex Adams Atlantic Dorchester Berks Cape May Kent Cumberland Queen Annes Dauphin Talbot Lancaster Wicomico Lebanon Lehigh Northampton Schuykill York New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island Pennsylvania New Jersey New York Connecticut Rhode Island Carbon Warren Columbia Hartford Kent Lackawanna Delaware Litchfield Newport Luzerne Duchess Middlesex Providence Monroe Greene New Haven Washington Pike Orange New London Wayne Putnam Tolland Sullivan Windham Ulster 14
5
*assumes implementation in all counties of OTR
15
6
*assumes implementation in all counties of OTR
16
7
*assumes implementation in all counties of OTR
17
8
*assumes implementation in all counties of OTR
18
Similar presentations
