Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Kernel Approximation for VIAbility and Resilience

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Kernel Approximation for VIAbility and Resilience"— Presentation transcript:

1 A tool to approximate viability kernels, capture basins and resilience values

2 Kernel Approximation for VIAbility and Resilience
Written in Java programming language Regular grid / active learning algorithm Capture basins and resilience values are computed in dim d Heavy or optimal controllers Two modes: GUI and batch mode

3 Installation and running
Requires the java virtual machine (Sun’s JRE environment 5 or later compulsory) 2 set up .jar file to test the models already implemented .zip file to implement new models

4 GUI mode Display window Console window

5 GUI mode (cont) Dynamical system settings Control bounds Time step
Function of the size of the grid Study of the dynamics!!! Viability constraint set

6 GUI mode (cont) Viability controller config General settings
Optimization settings Algorithm type Visualize the individual trajectories - Simple: gradient descent from the minimal values of the controls - Double: min and max values - Conjugate gradient - Double conjugate gradient - Newton method

7 Stopping criterion of the SVMs computation algorithm
GUI mode (cont) SVM configuration Stopping criterion of the SVMs computation algorithm SVM algorithm Bandwidth big C : hard margin(no misclassification) small C: soft margin Only the gaussian kernel is implemented Control the “smoothness” of the SVM function - Small gamma: smooth - Big gamma: less smooth - C-SMO: see libSVM - Simple SVM - Balk: automative bandwidth tuning - Soft-Balk: balk with soft margin

8 GUI mode (cont) Execution and control

9 GUI mode (cont) Indicators + logs

10 Example on the population problem
Viability kernel approximation Play with dt, # time steps, # points (and show trajectories) To obtain a “good” approximation, the dt value must be chosen accordingly the number of points and time steps Inner approximation sometimes… Save the results and reload them

11 Example on the population problem
Controller – Kernel approx with dt = 0.05, 6 time steps, 31 points A point out of the viability kernel approximation x0 = 2, y0 = 0.8, 20 time steps, 3 time steps anticipation, 3 distance SVM, dist(K) = 0.025 Inside the viability kernel x0 = 2, y0 = 0.5, 150 time steps More time steps anticipation: 15 Bigger SVM value: 30 Same parameters, with 1 time step for the viability kernel approximation

12 Adding a dynamical system
Creation of a new class file (for instance MyClass.java) Extend Dynamic_System if viability kernel approximation Extend Dynamic_System_Target if capture basins approximation Extend Dynamic_System_Resilience if resilience values In this class, create a main method to add your model and launch the software Public static void main (String[]args){ //init Kaviar kaviar = new Kaviar(); //Optional: to add default models Kaviar.addModels(Kaviar.DEFAULT_MODEL); //Optional: to add one of the default models //Kaviar.addModels(Population.class); //replace my model by the name of your model Kaviar.addModels(MyModel.class); //Launch the GUI Kaviar.startGUI(); }

13 MyClass.java (extends Dynamical_System)

14 MyClass.java (extends Dynamical_System_Target)
Previous +

15 MyClass.java (extends Dynamical_System_Resilience)
Previous +

16 Example on the Abrams&Strogatz model
Dynamics and constraints 2 languages A and B in competition, no bilingual people σA: density of speakers of language A (in % - [0;1]). Parameter a: volatility of language A (a > 1 leads a scenario of dominance of 1 language) Parameter s: prestige of language A (s = 0.5: the two languages are socially equivalent – [0;1]) Government, institution etc. can play on the prestige of one language, but modifications take time We consider that one language is endangered when its proportion of speakers is less that 20% with

17 Example on the Abrams&Strogatz model
Resilience values Endangered language doesn’t mean that the language is dead. Is there any action policies that allows the system to recover? At which cost? λ = 1: measure the time the system is deprived from its property of interest λ = c1*time + c2(distance(σA from viability))

18 Example on the Abrams&Strogatz model
Optimal control Compute the resilience values with the following parameters: dt =0.2, dc = 0.5, double optimization, C0 = 1, C1 = 300, 31 points, 6 time steps, inner approx a = 2: dominance of one language a = 0.2: stable coexistence Control of the system: x0 =0.95, y0= 0.95 and x0 =0.7, y0= 0.95 Optimal control outside the viability kernel Heavy control once the system is back to the kernel

19 Batch mode .simu files are needed
Create them following a given template Use the GUI interface java -cp Kaviar-1.1.jar Appli/Batch Conso.simu 2 files: .svm + .log files, in the Conso… directory

20 Batch mode java -cp Kaviar-1.1.jar Appli/Batch Conso.simu -v
9*2 files: .svm + .log files, in the Conso… directory


Download ppt "Kernel Approximation for VIAbility and Resilience"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google