Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Magnetic resonance (MR) structural-functional comparison.

Published byMikael Magnussen Modified over 6 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Magnetic resonance (MR) structural-functional comparison."— Presentation transcript:

1 Magnetic resonance (MR) structural-functional comparison.
Magnetic resonance (MR) structural-functional comparison. Conventional T2 weighted images (A and C) versus MR perfusion images (B and D); axial sections obtained at two levels of the brain. Functional data are displayed using a non-linear colour scale. CW, Circle of Willis; SS, sagittal sinus; L, left. See text for further details. S F Tanner et al. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2003;88:F525-F530 Copyright © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. All rights reserved.

Download ppt "Magnetic resonance (MR) structural-functional comparison."

Similar presentations

Comparison of the mean basal and nadir pH during gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) episodes with regional intragastric pH. *Gastric pH significantly higher.

Comparison of the mean basal and nadir pH during gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) episodes with regional intragastric pH. *Gastric pH significantly higher.
 Correlation between plasma total antioxidant capacity of plasma (TAC) and protein SH groups (SH) (A), total hydroperoxide concentration (TH) and TAC (B),

 Correlation between plasma total antioxidant capacity of plasma (TAC) and protein SH groups (SH) (A), total hydroperoxide concentration (TH) and TAC (B),
Reference ranges (mean and 95% confidence intervals), of umbilical venous and arterial pH with gestation. Reference ranges (mean and 95% confidence intervals),

Reference ranges (mean and 95% confidence intervals), of umbilical venous and arterial pH with gestation. Reference ranges (mean and 95% confidence intervals),
Coronal scan of an infant at 33 weeks of gestational age.

Coronal scan of an infant at 33 weeks of gestational age.
EEG maximal power frequency and relative power frequency distribution from 12 surface electrodes (horizontal axis) in children with (open circles) and.

EEG maximal power frequency and relative power frequency distribution from 12 surface electrodes (horizontal axis) in children with (open circles) and.
(A) Headbox oxygen; (B) facemask; (C) oxygen administration by holding an oxygen source near the infant’s face; (D) nasal cannulae; (E) nasal catheter;

(A) Headbox oxygen; (B) facemask; (C) oxygen administration by holding an oxygen source near the infant’s face; (D) nasal cannulae; (E) nasal catheter;
CBFV, ABP, and EEG over 328 seconds in a baby with electroclinical seizures. CBFV, ABP, and EEG over 328 seconds in a baby with electroclinical seizures.

CBFV, ABP, and EEG over 328 seconds in a baby with electroclinical seizures. CBFV, ABP, and EEG over 328 seconds in a baby with electroclinical seizures.
Box plot of subarachnoid space measurements at each gestational week of age. Box plot of subarachnoid space measurements at each gestational week of age.

Box plot of subarachnoid space measurements at each gestational week of age. Box plot of subarachnoid space measurements at each gestational week of age.
(A) Ultrasonograph showing a urinoma (asterisk) in the left prerenal space. (A) Ultrasonograph showing a urinoma (asterisk) in the left prerenal space.

(A) Ultrasonograph showing a urinoma (asterisk) in the left prerenal space. (A) Ultrasonograph showing a urinoma (asterisk) in the left prerenal space.
Sagittal T1 weighted spin echo MR images of the brain (TR = 387 ms, TE = 20 ms): (A) normal corpus callosum; (B) noticeable thinning of corpus callosum,

Sagittal T1 weighted spin echo MR images of the brain (TR = 387 ms, TE = 20 ms): (A) normal corpus callosum; (B) noticeable thinning of corpus callosum,
 Diagram of apparatus used to assess accuracy of measurements made with flow sensor 1 (FS1) using flow sensor 2 (FS2).  Diagram of apparatus used to assess.

 Diagram of apparatus used to assess accuracy of measurements made with flow sensor 1 (FS1) using flow sensor 2 (FS2).  Diagram of apparatus used to assess.
(A) The superior vena cava (SVC) entering the right atrium (RA) as seen from the subcostal view. (A) The superior vena cava (SVC) entering the right atrium.

(A) The superior vena cava (SVC) entering the right atrium (RA) as seen from the subcostal view. (A) The superior vena cava (SVC) entering the right atrium.
Normal ranges by corrected gestational age at scan for bFFE assessment of left ventricular output (A), end-diastolic volume (B), end-systolic volume (C)

Normal ranges by corrected gestational age at scan for bFFE assessment of left ventricular output (A), end-diastolic volume (B), end-systolic volume (C)
Box plot of head circumference measurements at each gestational week of age. Box plot of head circumference measurements at each gestational week of age.

Box plot of head circumference measurements at each gestational week of age. Box plot of head circumference measurements at each gestational week of age.
Pulse field gel electrophoresis: Lane 1 Lamda marker; lanes 2 to 5 K pneumoniae isolates from cases 3 to 6; lane 6 isolate from case 7; lane 7 ESBL negative.

Pulse field gel electrophoresis: Lane 1 Lamda marker; lanes 2 to 5 K pneumoniae isolates from cases 3 to 6; lane 6 isolate from case 7; lane 7 ESBL negative.
 (A) Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of the brain of a full term male infant 56 hours after birth, showing parasagittal changes.

 (A) Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of the brain of a full term male infant 56 hours after birth, showing parasagittal changes.
(A) Increasing shunt (from 0 to 40%) lowers the curve.

(A) Increasing shunt (from 0 to 40%) lowers the curve.
Example of data analysis from infant I

Example of data analysis from infant I
Magnetic resonance characterisation of punctate lesions.

Magnetic resonance characterisation of punctate lesions.
Plot of average differences in arterial blood pressure using the two methods in mm Hg against both methods for systolic blood pressure (A) and diastolic.

Plot of average differences in arterial blood pressure using the two methods in mm Hg against both methods for systolic blood pressure (A) and diastolic.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google