Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Chief Ministerโ€™s School Reforms Roadmap

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Chief Ministerโ€™s School Reforms Roadmap"โ€” Presentation transcript:

1 Chief Ministerโ€™s School Reforms Roadmap
Ranking of the Districts & Divisions 1st QUARTER (September 2017)

2 Monitoring Indicators (1/5)
Definition Target A. Literacy and Numeracy English Questions answered correctly ๐“๐จ๐ญ๐š๐ฅ ๐๐ฎ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ % A1 80% Urdu Questions answered correctly ๐“๐จ๐ญ๐š๐ฅ ๐๐ฎ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ % A2 80% Questions answered correctly ๐“๐จ๐ญ๐š๐ฅ ๐๐ฎ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ % Maths 80% A3 2 January 2019 Programme Monitoring & Implementation Unit

3 Monitoring Indicators (2/5)
Definition Target B. Core Student Attendance (1-12) Student PRESENT as % of total students ENROLLED B1 District Specific Teacher Presence Teachers PRESENT as a % of TOTAL teachers B2 90% Functioning Facilities FUNCTIONING & available facilities as a % of total REQUIRED facilities (Electricity, Boundary Wall, Drinking Water and Toilets) B3 95% District Administrators Visits % of schools visited by district administrators B4 90% 2 January 2019 Programme Monitoring & Implementation Unit

4 Monitoring Indicators (3/5)
Definition Target C. Retention Student Attendance (Kachi) Student PRESENT as % of total students ENROLLED C1 District Specific Retention (Kachi) CURRENT enrolment as % of BASELINE enrolment District Specific C2 Student Attendance (105) Student PRESENT as % of total students ENROLLED C3 District Specific Retention (1-5) CURRENT enrolment as % of BASELINE enrolment District Specific C4 2 January 2019 Programme Monitoring & Implementation Unit

5 Monitoring Indicators (4/5)
Definition Target D. Infrastructure OCMG due to Teachers Schools with inadequate number of primary teachers as a % of total schools District Specific D1 OCMG due to Classrooms Schools with inadequate number of classrooms as a % of total schools District Specific D2 Dangerous Buildings Schools with dangerous buildings as a % of total schools D3 2% 2 January 2019 Programme Monitoring & Implementation Unit

6 Monitoring Indicators (5/5)
Definition Target E. Monitoring & Management AEO Span of Control Average number of primary schools per AEO 23/1 E1 DTE Visits % of schools with adequate number of coaching visits by DTEs E2 90% 2 January 2019 Programme Monitoring & Implementation Unit

7 1-ENGLISH Target: 80% PMIU-PESRP Rank District Sepโ€™17 Target
Target achieved Rank District Sepโ€™17 Target Perf. against target Score 1 KHANEWAL 77.27 80 (2.73) 2 M.B.DIN 76.98 (3.02) 3 SARGODHA 76.00 (4.00) 4 JHELUM 75.98 (4.02) 5 RAWALPINDI 75.80 (4.20) 6 MULTAN 75.47 (4.53) 7 NANKANA SAHIB 75.36 (4.64) 8 GUJRAT 75.33 (4.67) 9 BAHAWALPUR 75.19 (4.81) 10 CHINIOT 74.53 (5.47) 11 T.T.SINGH 74.37 (5.63) 12 OKARA 74.13 (5.87) 13 ATTOCK 73.81 (6.19) 14 LAHORE 73.51 (6.49) 15 PAKPATTAN 73.50 (6.50) 16 RAHIMYAR KHAN 73.46 (6.54) 17 HAFIZABAD 73.33 (6.67) 18 CHAKWAL 73.30 (6.70) 19 LODHRAN 73.00 (7.00) 20 SAHIWAL 72.41 (7.59) 21 BHAKKAR 71.71 (8.29) 22 MUZAFFARGARH 71.55 (8.45) 23 BAHAWALNAGAR 71.09 (8.91) 24 JHANG 70.97 (9.03) 25 SIALKOT 70.87 (9.13) 26 VEHARI 70.72 (9.28) 27 SHEIKHUPURA 70.20 (9.80) 28 FAISALABAD 69.98 (10.02) 29 D.G. KHAN 69.74 (10.26) 30 KHUSHAB 69.61 (10.39) 31 LAYYAH 69.25 (10.75) 32 MIANWALI 68.57 (11.43) 33 GUJRANWALA 68.12 (11.88) 34 KASUR 68.00 (12.00) 35 RAJANPUR 67.42 (12.58) 36 NAROWAL 65.91 (14.09) Target not achieved Punjab Performance : 72.4% Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal GujrCanwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan Gujranwala PMIU-PESRP

8 2-URDU Target: 80% PMIU-PESRP Rank District Sepโ€™17 Target
Target achieved Rank District Sepโ€™17 Target Perf. against target Score 1 T.T.SINGH 85.73 80 5.73 2 NANKANA SAHIB 85.66 5.66 3 JHELUM 85.54 5.54 4 GUJRAT 85.17 5.17 5 BAHAWALPUR 84.88 4.88 6 RAWALPINDI 84.74 4.74 7 SARGODHA 84.67 4.67 8 M.B.DIN 84.38 4.38 9 LODHRAN 84.13 4.13 10 PAKPATTAN 84.11 4.11 11 KHANEWAL 84.07 4.07 12 ATTOCK 83.33 3.33 13 SAHIWAL 82.81 2.81 14 MIANWALI 82.69 2.69 15 CHAKWAL 82.65 2.65 16 LAHORE 82.42 2.42 17 RAHIMYAR KHAN 81.84 1.84 18 JHANG 81.81 1.81 19 HAFIZABAD 81.80 1.80 20 LAYYAH 81.70 1.70 21 BHAKKAR 81.66 1.66 22 BAHAWALNAGAR 81.02 1.02 23 MULTAN 80.90 0.90 24 SIALKOT 80.34 0.34 25 CHINIOT 80.26 0.26 26 KHUSHAB 79.29 (0.71) 27 D.G. KHAN 79.23 (0.77) 28 SHEIKHUPURA 78.93 (1.07) 29 FAISALABAD 77.79 (2.21) 30 NAROWAL 77.78 (2.22) 31 RAJANPUR 77.55 (2.45) 32 KASUR 77.50 (2.50) 33 OKARA 77.34 (2.66) 34 MUZAFFARGARH 77.33 (2.67) 35 GUJRANWALA 77.14 (2.86) 36 VEHARI 76.54 (3.46) Target not achieved Punjab Performance : 81.5% Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan GujrCanwala Gujranwala PMIU-PESRP

9 3-MATH Target: 80% PMIU-PESRP Rank District Sepโ€™17 Target
Target achieved Rank District Sepโ€™17 Target Perf. against target Score 1 BAHAWALPUR 82.85 80 2.85 2 KHANEWAL 82.67 2.67 3 SARGODHA 82.07 2.07 4 NANKANA SAHIB 81.98 1.98 5 PAKPATTAN 81.65 1.65 6 M.B.DIN 80.81 0.81 7 T.T.SINGH 80.80 0.80 8 RAWALPINDI 80.70 0.70 9 BHAKKAR 80.52 0.52 10 GUJRAT 80.43 0.43 11 MULTAN 80.27 0.27 12 JHELUM 80.05 0.05 13 LODHRAN 14 ATTOCK 79.96 (0.04) 15 OKARA 79.78 (0.22) 16 CHINIOT 79.75 (0.25) 17 RAHIMYAR KHAN 79.70 (0.30) 18 HAFIZABAD 79.54 (0.46) 19 LAHORE 79.07 (0.93) 20 CHAKWAL 79.06 (0.94) 21 SAHIWAL 78.80 (1.20) 22 MUZAFFARGARH 78.66 (1.34) 23 BAHAWALNAGAR 78.58 (1.42) 24 D.G. KHAN 78.22 (1.78) 25 MIANWALI 77.77 (2.23) 26 LAYYAH 77.13 (2.87) 27 JHANG 76.85 (3.15) 28 VEHARI 29 RAJANPUR 76.38 (3.62) 30 SHEIKHUPURA 75.82 (4.18) 31 SIALKOT 75.25 (4.75) 32 FAISALABAD 75.01 (4.99) 33 KASUR 74.41 (5.59) 34 KHUSHAB 74.22 (5.78) 35 GUJRANWALA 74.03 (5.97) 36 NAROWAL 71.04 (8.96) Target not achieved Punjab Performance : 78.6% Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal GujrCanwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan Gujranwala PMIU-PESRP

10 1-STUDENT ATTENDANCE (1-12)
Target: District specific Target achieved Rank District Sepโ€™17 Target Perf. against target Score 1 PAKPATTAN 93.7 88 5.7 2 BHAKKAR 90.1 85 5.1 3 RAHIMYAR KHAN 89.8 4.8 4 MULTAN 94.4 90 4.4 5 GUJRANWALA 92.2 4.2 6 NANKANA SAHIB 92.1 4.1 7 OKARA 3.7 8 CHINIOT 9 JHELUM 10 HAFIZABAD 93.6 3.6 11 T.T.SINGH 93.4 3.4 12 KHANEWAL 93.3 3.3 13 GUJRAT 92.9 2.9 14 M.B.DIN 92.6 2.6 15 RAWALPINDI 90.6 16 CHAKWAL 92.4 2.4 17 LAYYAH 90.4 18 SAHIWAL 92.3 2.3 19 SARGODHA 20 MIANWALI 90.2 2.2 21 RAJANPUR 87.1 2.1 22 BAHAWALNAGAR 92.0 2.0 23 MUZAFFARGARH 1.8 24 SHEIKHUPURA 91.7 1.7 25 D.G. KHAN 86.6 1.6 26 FAISALABAD 91.5 1.5 27 JHANG 91.3 1.3 28 KHUSHAB 29 BAHAWALPUR 91.2 1.2 30 VEHARI 90.9 0.9 31 NAROWAL 88.7 0.7 32 LODHRAN 0.6 33 SIALKOT 34 ATTOCK 0.2 35 LAHORE 36 KASUR 89.0 (1.0) Target not achieved Punjab Performance : 91.4% Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan Gujranwala PMIU-PESRP

11 2-TEACHER PRESENCE Target: 90% PMIU-PESRP Rank District Sepโ€™17 Target
Target achieved Rank District Sepโ€™17 Target Perf. against target Score 1 CHINIOT 96.9 90 6.87 2 OKARA 96.7 6.71 3 T.T.SINGH 96.1 6.08 4 PAKPATTAN 96.0 6.01 5 MUZAFFARGARH 6 BHAKKAR 5.99 7 JHELUM 95.9 5.91 8 GUJRAT 95.8 5.80 9 MULTAN 95.5 5.48 10 SARGODHA 5.46 11 LAYYAH 95.4 5.44 12 RAJANPUR 5.37 13 HAFIZABAD 95.3 5.35 14 CHAKWAL 95.2 5.19 15 KHUSHAB 95.0 4.98 16 BAHAWALPUR 4.96 17 SHEIKHUPURA 94.9 4.89 18 FAISALABAD 4.87 19 LODHRAN 94.8 4.83 20 JHANG 94.7 4.72 21 NANKANA SAHIB 94.6 4.61 22 KASUR 23 SAHIWAL 4.59 24 ATTOCK 94.5 4.52 25 SIALKOT 94.3 4.32 26 GUJRANWALA 27 D.G. KHAN 4.30 28 MIANWALI 4.29 29 VEHARI 94.1 4.13 30 KHANEWAL 31 RAHIMYAR KHAN 4.07 32 M.B.DIN 93.8 3.81 33 BAHAWALNAGAR 93.7 3.70 34 LAHORE 93.6 3.60 35 RAWALPINDI 93.1 3.13 36 NAROWAL 93.0 2.97 Target not achieved Punjab Performance : 94.8 % Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan Present Teachers: 1-Physicall Present Teachers 2-On Exam Duty 3-On Training PMIU-PESRP

12 4-FUNCTIONING OF FACILITIES
Target: 95% Target achieved Rank District Sepโ€™17 Target Perf. against target Score 1 JHELUM 99.8 95.0 4.8 2 CHINIOT 99.7 4.7 3 GUJRAT 4 LAHORE 5 VEHARI 99.5 4.5 6 KHANEWAL 99.3 4.3 7 LODHRAN 8 M.B.DIN 9 SARGODHA 99.1 4.1 10 KASUR 11 GUJRANWALA 99.0 4.0 12 CHAKWAL 98.8 3.8 13 HAFIZABAD 14 LAYYAH 98.6 3.6 15 ATTOCK 98.5 3.5 16 MULTAN 98.4 3.4 17 FAISALABAD 18 MIANWALI 98.2 3.2 19 SIALKOT 98.1 3.1 20 OKARA 98.0 3.0 21 BHAKKAR 97.9 2.9 22 NANKANA SAHIB 23 KHUSHAB 97.7 2.7 24 PAKPATTAN 97.4 2.4 25 MUZAFFARGARH 97.3 2.3 26 SHEIKHUPURA 97.1 2.1 27 SAHIWAL 97.0 2.0 28 BAHAWALNAGAR 96.9 1.9 29 BAHAWALPUR 30 NAROWAL 96.5 1.5 31 RAWALPINDI 96.4 1.4 32 T.T.SINGH 33 RAHIMYAR KHAN 96.3 1.3 34 JHANG 96.1 1.1 35 RAJANPUR 91.8 (3.2) 36 D.G. KHAN Target not achieved Punjab Performance : 97.7% Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan Facilities: 1-Electricity 2-Drinking Water 3-Toilets 4-Boundary Wall PMIU-PESRP

13 5-STUDENT ATTENDANCE (K)
Target: District specific Target achieved Rank District Sepโ€™17 Target Perf. against target Score 1 MULTAN 95.0 90 5.0 2 RAHIMYAR KHAN 89.5 85 4.5 3 T.T.SINGH 94.2 4.2 4 JHELUM 93.8 3.8 5 HAFIZABAD 93.7 3.7 6 CHAKWAL 7 GUJRAT 93.2 3.2 8 KHANEWAL 9 GUJRANWALA 91.2 88 10 SARGODHA 92.8 2.8 11 OKARA 92.6 2.6 12 M.B.DIN 92.1 2.1 13 RAWALPINDI 90.0 2.0 14 BHAKKAR 86.8 1.8 15 PAKPATTAN 89.6 1.6 16 LAYYAH 17 NANKANA SAHIB 18 MUZAFFARGARH 1.5 19 SHEIKHUPURA 91.4 1.4 20 ATTOCK 91.3 1.3 21 CHINIOT 90.7 0.7 22 BAHAWALPUR 90.6 0.6 23 KHUSHAB 24 JHANG 90.5 0.5 25 SAHIWAL 26 KASUR 90.2 0.2 27 BAHAWALNAGAR 28 MIANWALI 88.2 29 FAISALABAD (0.5) 30 LAHORE 31 RAJANPUR 84.1 (0.9) 32 LODHRAN 88.9 (1.1) 33 D.G. KHAN 83.8 (1.2) 34 VEHARI 88.6 (1.4) 35 NAROWAL 85.6 (2.4) 36 SIALKOT 87.2 (2.8) Target not achieved Punjab Performance : 90% Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan PMIU-PESRP

14 6-RETENTION (K) Target: District Specific PMIU-PESRP Rank District
Target achieved Rank District Sepโ€™17 Target Perf. against target Score 1 LAHORE 98.9 92.0 6.93 2 PAKPATTAN 99.0 93.0 5.99 3 KHANEWAL 99.1 93.4 5.69 4 RAJANPUR 94.1 5.02 5 RAWALPINDI 98.8 94.3 4.51 6 NANKANA SAHIB 94.4 4.32 7 ATTOCK 99.3 95.4 3.88 8 JHELUM 99.6 96.3 3.30 9 BAHAWALNAGAR 96.8 93.6 3.24 10 GUJRANWALA 95.6 3.18 11 SARGODHA 96.2 12 M.B.DIN 99.5 96.4 3.01 13 CHINIOT 95.8 2.92 14 MUZAFFARGARH 96.1 2.78 15 KHUSHAB 96.9 2.68 16 SAHIWAL 2.67 17 VEHARI 96.7 2.59 18 HAFIZABAD 98.3 95.7 2.56 19 T.T.SINGH 99.7 97.2 2.46 20 JHANG 97.1 2.01 21 BAHAWALPUR 1.92 22 LODHRAN 97.7 1.91 23 BHAKKAR 97.3 1.75 24 SHEIKHUPURA 97.4 1.61 25 OKARA 1.40 26 NAROWAL 97.6 1.39 27 LAYYAH 1.37 28 FAISALABAD 98.2 1.33 29 SIALKOT 0.96 30 GUJRAT 98.7 0.84 31 RAHIMYAR KHAN 98.5 0.76 32 CHAKWAL 0.74 33 D.G. KHAN 0.69 34 MULTAN 97.0 0.15 35 MIANWALI 0.10 36 KASUR 0.07 Target not achieved Punjab Performance : 98.8% Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan PMIU-PESRP

15 7-STUDENT ATTENDANCE (1-5)
Target: District specific Target achieved Rank District Sepโ€™17 Target Perf. against target Score 1 PAKPATTAN 93.3 88 5.3 2 RAHIMYAR KHAN 89.7 85 4.7 3 BHAKKAR 89.6 4.6 4 NANKANA SAHIB 92.3 4.3 5 MULTAN 94.2 90 4.2 6 GUJRANWALA 91.7 3.7 7 HAFIZABAD 93.6 3.6 8 JHELUM 93.4 3.4 9 CHINIOT 93.2 3.2 10 KHANEWAL 11 T.T.SINGH 93.1 3.1 12 OKARA 13 GUJRAT 92.8 2.8 14 CHAKWAL 92.2 2.2 15 LAYYAH 90.2 16 SARGODHA 17 RAWALPINDI 90.1 2.1 18 M.B.DIN 92.0 2.0 19 SHEIKHUPURA 20 SAHIWAL 91.8 1.8 21 BAHAWALNAGAR 91.5 1.5 22 MUZAFFARGARH 89.4 1.4 23 MIANWALI 89.3 1.3 24 RAJANPUR 86.1 1.1 25 KHUSHAB 90.9 0.9 26 ATTOCK 27 FAISALABAD 90.7 0.7 28 BAHAWALPUR 29 JHANG 90.6 0.6 30 LAHORE 90.4 0.4 31 LODHRAN 90.3 0.3 32 VEHARI 0.1 33 NAROWAL 88.1 34 D.G. KHAN 84.6 (0.4) 35 SIALKOT (0.6) 36 KASUR 88.3 (1.7) Target not achieved Punjab Performance : 91% Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan PMIU-PESRP

16 8-RETENTION (1-5) Target: District Specific PMIU-PESRP Rank District
Target achieved Rank District Sepโ€™17 Target Perf. against target Score 1 PAKPATTAN 98.1 77.2 20.9 2 LAHORE 98.0 86.7 11.3 3 JHELUM 98.5 88.2 10.4 4 ATTOCK 98.2 87.9 10.3 5 BAHAWALNAGAR 97.7 89.0 8.7 6 RAJANPUR 97.1 88.7 8.4 7 GUJRANWALA 90.6 7.9 8 LODHRAN 98.8 91.3 7.5 9 SAHIWAL 6.8 10 BAHAWALPUR 97.2 91.4 5.9 11 KHUSHAB 96.3 5.7 12 BHAKKAR 98.6 93.0 5.5 13 JHANG 92.6 5.1 14 NANKANA SAHIB 95.7 91.1 4.7 15 MUZAFFARGARH 92.9 4.3 16 RAHIMYAR KHAN 97.8 93.6 4.2 17 MULTAN 93.7 4.0 18 D.G. KHAN 93.3 3.9 19 HAFIZABAD 94.2 3.6 20 RAWALPINDI 97.6 94.3 3.3 21 LAYYAH 95.6 3.0 22 SARGODHA 95.9 2.8 23 KHANEWAL 94.4 2.7 24 VEHARI 95.5 2.6 25 M.B.DIN 96.5 2.3 26 OKARA 99.2 96.9 27 T.T.SINGH 97.0 2.2 28 CHINIOT 95.0 29 SIALKOT 95.4 30 FAISALABAD 98.9 1.9 31 SHEIKHUPURA 96.6 32 CHAKWAL 99.1 97.3 1.8 33 KASUR 99.3 1.6 34 MIANWALI 0.9 35 NAROWAL 0.5 36 GUJRAT 0.1 Target not achieved Punjab Performance : 98% Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan PMIU-PESRP

17 9-DANGEROUS BUILDING Target: 2% PMIU-PESRP Rank District Sepโ€™17 Target
Target achieved Rank District Sepโ€™17 Target Perf. against target Score 1 HAFIZABAD - 2 2.00 PAKPATTAN 0.1 1.87 3 CHINIOT 0.2 1.85 4 T.T.SINGH 0.3 1.66 5 SAHIWAL 0.5 1.54 6 OKARA 0.6 1.37 7 MIANWALI 0.8 1.17 8 CHAKWAL 1.0 1.02 9 KASUR 1.1 0.92 10 GUJRAT 0.91 11 BHAKKAR 1.2 0.81 12 FAISALABAD 1.3 0.73 13 KHANEWAL 0.70 14 JHANG 1.4 0.57 15 JHELUM 1.5 0.48 16 MUZAFFARGARH 1.6 0.36 17 SIALKOT 18 ATTOCK 1.7 0.31 19 M.B.DIN 1.8 0.23 20 SHEIKHUPURA 2.0 0.04 21 LAYYAH 2.5 (0.47) 22 SARGODHA 2.6 (0.62) 23 VEHARI 2.7 (0.69) 24 LAHORE 2.8 (0.78) 25 BAHAWALNAGAR 3.0 (0.96) 26 GUJRANWALA 3.5 (1.48) 27 RAHIMYAR KHAN 3.6 (1.60) 28 BAHAWALPUR 3.9 (1.87) 29 MULTAN (1.90) 30 RAJANPUR 4.1 (2.14) 31 KHUSHAB 4.4 (2.36) 32 LODHRAN 5.7 (3.73) 33 NAROWAL 5.9 (3.92) 34 NANKANA SAHIB 7.6 (5.56) 35 RAWALPINDI 7.7 (5.65) 36 D.G. KHAN 8.7 (6.69) Target not achieved Punjab Performance : 2.7% Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan Dangerous Building: 1-Partially 2-Fully PMIU-PESRP

18 10-OCMG - CLASSROOMS Target: District Specific PMIU-PESRP Rank
Target achieved Rank District Sepโ€™17 Target Perf. against target Score 1 LAHORE 38.1 35.8 (2.3) 2 SARGODHA 29.8 27.2 (2.6) 3 D.G. KHAN 52.2 47.1 (5.1) 4 JHANG 49.6 42.1 (7.5) 5 T.T.SINGH 47.4 36.7 (10.7) 6 KHANEWAL 42.4 30.7 (11.7) 7 OKARA 52.9 39.9 (13.0) 8 MULTAN 50.8 34.6 (16.2) 9 BAHAWALPUR 44.3 27.5 (16.8) 10 RAWALPINDI 31.7 13.7 (17.9) 11 CHINIOT 62.0 44.0 (18.1) 12 SIALKOT 50.6 32.3 (18.3) 13 JHELUM 31.2 12.7 (18.5) 14 CHAKWAL 27.7 9.0 (18.7) 15 KHUSHAB 40.0 21.2 (18.8) 16 FAISALABAD 60.8 41.8 (19.0) 17 M.B.DIN 43.2 24.0 (19.2) 18 NANKANA SAHIB 51.0 30.8 (20.2) 19 GUJRAT 44.2 23.3 (20.9) 20 GUJRANWALA 50.3 29.1 (21.2) 21 SAHIWAL 51.5 30.0 (21.5) 22 SHEIKHUPURA 60.2 38.3 (21.9) 23 KASUR 69.3 47.2 (22.1) 24 NAROWAL 55.2 31.8 (23.4) 25 MUZAFFARGARH 65.5 41.2 (24.3) 26 MIANWALI 56.2 31.5 (24.7) 27 PAKPATTAN 59.5 34.5 (25.1) 28 LAYYAH 58.5 33.2 (25.3) 29 LODHRAN 53.2 27.1 (26.1) 30 ATTOCK 48.5 20.9 (27.6) 31 BAHAWALNAGAR 63.5 35.9 32 HAFIZABAD 25.3 (27.9) 33 VEHARI 54.8 26.8 (28.0) 34 RAHIMYAR KHAN 68.4 38.7 (29.7) 35 RAJANPUR 69.7 36 BHAKKAR 69.2 36.9 (32.2) Target not achieved Punjab Performance : 51.9% Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan Enrolment Classrooms 30 2 45 3 150 4 230 6 310 8 >310 50:1 PMIU-PESRP

19 11-OCMG - TEACHERS Target: District Specific PMIU-PESRP Rank District
Target achieved Rank District Sepโ€™17 Target Perf. against target Score 1 RAJANPUR 11.2 58.7 47.5 2 LAYYAH 29.8 69.6 39.8 3 MUZAFFARGARH 27.6 65.9 38.3 4 BHAKKAR 28.3 65.4 37.2 5 JHANG 19.1 55.0 35.9 6 OKARA 26.1 61.7 35.6 7 D.G. KHAN 21.0 56.5 35.5 8 BAHAWALPUR 17.7 52.6 34.9 9 KASUR 20.5 55.1 34.6 10 RAHIMYAR KHAN 35.8 67.9 32.1 11 SHEIKHUPURA 28.0 55.9 27.9 12 M.B.DIN 27.5 54.9 27.3 13 VEHARI 37.7 64.7 27.0 14 GUJRAT 20.9 47.1 26.2 15 NANKANA SAHIB 52.0 25.9 16 NAROWAL 5.8 31.5 25.7 17 HAFIZABAD 33.1 57.8 24.6 18 PAKPATTAN 42.6 65.8 23.1 19 CHINIOT 38.1 60.1 22.0 20 LODHRAN 30.7 52.5 21.8 21 MIANWALI 29.7 47.8 18.2 22 ATTOCK 19.5 35.4 16.0 23 JHELUM 24.2 39.0 14.8 24 BAHAWALNAGAR 40.0 54.1 14.1 25 CHAKWAL 16.3 25.2 8.9 26 SAHIWAL 42.9 50.5 7.6 27 T.T.SINGH 40.1 47.4 7.3 28 SIALKOT 32.8 7.1 29 FAISALABAD 39.7 46.1 6.4 30 LAHORE 29.2 34.5 5.3 31 GUJRANWALA 37.1 2.5 32 RAWALPINDI 19.4 1.5 33 KHUSHAB 38.7 37.9 (0.8) 34 MULTAN 43.4 (4.4) 35 SARGODHA 50.3 44.6 (5.6) 36 KHANEWAL 48.0 39.1 (8.9) Target not achieved Punjab Performance : 30.6% Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan Enrolment Teachers 30 2 45 3 180 4 300 6 400 8 >400 50:1 PMIU-PESRP

20 12-AEO SPAN OF CONTROL Target: 23:1 PMIU-PESRP Rank District Sepโ€™17
Target achieved Rank District Sepโ€™17 Target Perf. against target Score 1 OKARA 6.6 23 16.4 2 MUZAFFARGARH 7.2 15.8 3 MIANWALI 8.8 14.2 4 T.T.SINGH 9.1 13.9 5 BAHAWALPUR 9.9 13.1 6 M.B.DIN 10.0 13.0 7 KHUSHAB 10.1 12.9 8 JHELUM 10.2 12.8 9 MULTAN 10 VEHARI 10.3 12.7 11 CHAKWAL 12 CHINIOT 13 HAFIZABAD 10.6 12.4 14 BHAKKAR 10.8 12.2 15 LAYYAH 16 KASUR 17 KHANEWAL 18 PAKPATTAN 10.9 12.1 19 SHEIKHUPURA 11.3 11.7 20 ATTOCK 11.5 21 FAISALABAD 12.3 10.7 22 LAHORE RAJANPUR 12.6 10.4 24 RAHIMYAR KHAN 25 GUJRANWALA 13.2 9.8 26 SAHIWAL 14.1 8.9 27 SARGODHA 28 SIALKOT 14.5 8.5 29 NAROWAL 15.1 7.9 30 JHANG 15.5 7.5 31 GUJRAT 15.7 7.3 32 NANKANA SAHIB 16.1 6.9 33 D.G. KHAN 34 RAWALPINDI 16.3 6.7 35 BAHAWALNAGAR 36 LODHRAN 16.5 6.5 Target not achieved Punjab Performance : 12:1 Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan PMIU-PESRP

21 Avg. Perf. Against target in SA & TP
CONSOLIDATED โ€“ 1st Quarter Equal to or greater than 12 Rank District Sepโ€™17 Avg. Perf. Against target in SA & TP 1 PAKPATTAN 12 5.83 2 BHAKKAR 5.54 3 JHELUM 4.80 4 T.T.SINGH 4.74 5 GUJRAT 4.37 6 MANDI BAHA UD DIN 3.22 7 CHINIOT 11 5.28 8 HAFIZABAD 4.49 9 NANKANA SAHIB 4.35 10 CHAKWAL 3.79 KHANEWAL 3.70 SAHIWAL 3.45 13 MIANWALI 3.27 14 BAHAWALPUR 3.06 15 JHANG 3.01 16 RAWALPINDI 2.85 17 ATTOCK 2.38 18 OKARA 5.21 19 MULTAN 4.94 20 RAHIMYAR KHAN 4.42 21 LAYYAH 3.91 22 MUZAFFARGARH 3.89 23 SARGODHA 3.87 24 SHEIKHUPURA 3.28 25 BAHAWALNAGAR 2.87 26 LODHRAN 2.71 27 GUJRANWALA 4.28 28 FAISALABAD 3.18 29 SIALKOT 2.45 30 LAHORE 1.92 31 KHUSHAB 3.12 32 VEHARI 2.51 33 NAROWAL 1.85 34 KASUR 1.80 35 RAJANPUR 3.75 36 D.G. KHAN 2.95 Greater than or equal to 8 but less than 12 Greater than and equal to 6 but less than 8 Less than 6 Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan PMIU-PESRP

22 CONSOLIDATED โ€“ 1st Quarter 2017-18
Equal to or greater than 12 Greater than or equal to 8 but less than 12 Greater than and equal to 6 but less than 8 Less than 6 Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Vehari . Rawalpindi Jhelum M.B . Din Narowal Okara Chakwal Kasur Division Score RAWALPINDI 11.25 SAHIWAL 11.00 FAISALABAD 10.75 BAHAWALPUR 10.33 SARGODHA 10.25 GUJRANWALA 10.16 MULTAN 9.75 LAHORE 9.50 D.G.KHAN 8.25 Rawalpindi Gujranwala Sargodha Lahore Faisalabad Sahiwal D.G.Khan Multan Bahawalpur PMIU-PESRP

23 Top 5 Districts Pakpattan Bhakkar Jhelum T.T.Singh Gujrat

24 Bottom 5 Districts 36.D.G.Khan 35.Rajanpur 34.Kasur 33.Narowal 32.Vehari

25 District & Quarter wise Ranking Positions โ€“ 2016-17
4th 3rd 2nd 1st PAKPATTAN 1 10 3 2 BHAKKAR 12 17 6 13 JHELUM 4 5 T.T.SINGH 14 9 7 GUJRAT 33 23 11 M.B.DIN 32 CHINIOT 27 15 HAFIZABAD 8 21 NANKANA SAHIB 18 CHAKWAL 20 KHANEWAL 36 30 SAHIWAL 25 31 29 26 MIANWALI BAHAWALPUR 22 28 JHANG RAWALPINDI 16 ATTOCK OKARA MULTAN 19 RAHIMYAR KHAN 24 LAYYAH MUZAFFARGARH SARGODHA SHEIKHUPURA BAHAWALNAGAR LODHRAN GUJRANWALA FAISALABAD SIALKOT 35 34 LAHORE KHUSHAB VEHARI NAROWAL KASUR RAJANPUR D.G. KHAN

26 Thanks


Download ppt "Chief Ministerโ€™s School Reforms Roadmap"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google