Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

SENIOR DESIGN PROJECT P08455

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "SENIOR DESIGN PROJECT P08455"— Presentation transcript:

1 SENIOR DESIGN PROJECT P08455
Value Engineering Dresser Rand Compressor Case SENIOR DESIGN PROJECT P08455 Stephen Papa (IE- Project Manager), Chris Bulawa (ME), John Foley (ME), Eric Hodecker (ME) and John Roylance-(IE)

2 Value Engineering in a Manufacturing Facility
Objective: Design and build a safe compressor final internal assembly stand for the Olean Manufacturing Facility.

3 Identify Customer Needs
Step 1: Gather Raw Data From Customers Interviews Dresser Rand Site Visits Step 2: Interpret Raw Data in Terms of Customer Needs Customer Statement -> Interpreted Needs

4 Step 3: Project Requirements
Key Needs: Adjust to different sized compressors. [Length (35”-86”) and Diameter 21”-43”)] Be able to support up to 30,000lbs for a week. Support different sized Heads Work bench to support assembly tools Organize the Needs into a Hierarchy: Need 1: The holding technique and hardware needs to be safe. Need 2: The holding technique and hardware needs to avoid damage. Need 3: The holding technique and hardware needs to support compressor case functions. Need 4: The holding technique and hardware needs to be adjustable. Need 5: The holding technique and hardware needs to be quick. Need 6: The lifting technique and hardware needs to be cost effective. Need 7: The holding technique needs to be standardized. Organize the Needs into a Hierarchy:

5 Step 4. Establish the Relative Importance of the Needs

6 Step 3: House of Quality:

7 Competitive Benchmarking
Head Pipe Clamps to Support Head Top Half is Removed During Final Assembly Bundle Cradles Complete Bundle on Contract Tooling

8 Concept Subsystems Sub Systems Main Compressor Stand Head Support
Work Bench Feet Length Adjustability

9 Concept Subsystems (Compressor Stand)
Main Compressor Stand Solid “V” Design Adjustable “V” Design Adjustable Support design

10 Solid “V” Design Advantages: Simplicity Low cost No moving parts
Fits all compressor diameters Disadvantages: Height not adjustable Length not adjustable Lacks ergonomics

11 Adjustable “V” Design Advantages:
Adjustable V and length using track system Disadvantages: Height ergonomics

12 Adjustable Support Design
Advantages: Adjustable V and length using track system Supports optimum height work level Disadvantages: More Complex Cost

13 Compressor Stand Selection (Pughs)

14 Concept Subsystems (Head Support)
Jack Stand Drawer End Table V Pin V

15 Jack Stand Drawer Advantages: Integrated into compressor stand
Industry used jack stand Disadvantages: Maintenance of track Drawer support

16 End Table V Advantages: Simplicity Rigidity Disadvantages:
Not height adjustable Separate table

17 Pin V Advantages: Simplicity Holds all heads Disadvantages:
Separate table

18 Head Support (Pughs)

19 Concept Subsystems (Work Bench)
Bracket Bench Swivel Bench Fold Away Table

20 Swivel Table Advantages: Adjustable height
Able to be moved to different locations Disadvantages: Wear on joints Cumbersome

21 Bracket Table Advantages: Movable Adjustable in height Rigid
Disadvantages: Time to move Ergonomics

22 Fold Away Table Advantages: Adjustable in height
Fold away to get out of way Rigid Disadvantages: Ergonomics

23 Work Bench (Pughs)

24 Concept Subsystems (Length Adjustability)
Track Screw Pin Hole

25 Screw Advantages: Ergonomics Changeover Speed Adjustability
Disadvantages: Cost Manufacturability

26 Pin Hole Advantages: Ergonomics Rigidity Stability Disadvantages:
Safety Ergonomic Changeover

27 Track Advantages: Ergonomics Rigidity Stability Disadvantages:
Changeover speed Ease of use

28 Concept Subsystems (Length Adjustability)
Concepts A Track B Screw C Pin Hole Selection Criteria Weight Rating Weighted Score Cost 3 4 12 2 6 Manufacturability 24 18 Ergonomic (work) 5 25 20 Ergonomic (changeover) 10 30 Adjustability (length) 40 50 Maintenance Safety Encumbrance 15 Ease of use (changeover) Compressor Accessibility Changeover Speed Durability 9 45 36 Stability 7 28 35 Total 359 313 348 Rank 1 Continue ? yes no develop

29 Concept Subsystems (Feet)
Spring Loaded Casters Screwed Feet (Stationary)

30 Spring Loaded Polyurethane Wheel
Advantages: Allows easier changeover Stability Disadvantages: Unable to change workstation level Maintenance

31 Braked Casters Advantages: Strong
Able to lock in place for a secure workstation Disadvantages: Unable to change workstation level Maintenance

32 Threaded Feet Advantages: Strong Easy to level workstation
Disadvantages: Cumbersome when adjusting table

33 Concept Subsystems (Feet)
Concepts A Spring loaded B Casters C Screwed in Feet Selection Criteria Weight Rating Weighted Score Cost 3 2 6 9 Manufacturability 5 15 Ergonomic (work) 10 4 40 50 Ergonomic (changeover) 30 Maintenance 24 Safety Leveling ability Encumbrance 12 Ease of use (changeover) Changeover Speed 18 Durability 8 32 Stability Total 371 362 368 Rank 1 Continue ? yes no

34 Final Design


Download ppt "SENIOR DESIGN PROJECT P08455"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google