1. TA-SE THIRD GENERAL MEETING
SAG: Civil Engineering
Jakarta
March 2018

2. WE ARE NOW A FAMILY
Thank you TUNING TA-SE

3. AGENDA/OUTCOMES Defining student’s workload: questionnaire survey
Task 2: Bridging between Meta profile and your own program: Reflection to identify gaps
Designing/Re-designing a programme: 10 steps in the Tuning Method: Leading towards 4th General Meeting in Bangkok in September
Discussion on publication for the group

4. Agenda 1: Student’s Workload

5. Student Work Load Survey
TUNING would like to run a survey on students’ typical work load in a semester
Some time reference: may start about two month from now and must end latest June/July to be in time for analysis for 4th General Meeting in Bangkok
We prefer to do the survey based on the present semester
We suggested on 6th semester for 4 year programme and 8th semester on 5 year programme - we got agreement from Tuning

6. Agenda 2: Revisiting Task 2 META-PROFILE vs our own programme

7. META-PROFILE FRAMEWORK Civil Engineering
Advantages
The competencies that are in two domains allow our future graduates to posses the 21st century skills better
The designation of importance in the meta-profile will demand more emphasis in the curriculum design as well as the teaching and learning as well as in the assessment of outcome attainment that follows

8. META-PROFILE Civil Engineering
Personal
Skills
Social
Values G1 G7
G10, G13
S13
Technical
S3, S4,S6,
S7,S14
S12 G3
G9,S1
S10,G12 G4
G2,G11,
S2,S5,S8,S9,S11
G8,G6 G5
Only between Social
and Personal Skills
Reprioritising Importance
Top in importance
Medium in importance
Bottom in importance

9. COMPETENCIES (Civil Engineering) - sorted by importance
Social Skiils
Technical Skiils
Personal Skills
Values
Importance G1
Ability to work collaboratively and effectively in diverse contexts x
Top G3
Ability to uphold professional, moral and ethical values G4
Ability to demonstrate responsibility and accountability towards the society and environment G5
Ability to communicate clearly and effectively G7
Ability to understand, value, and respect diversity and multiculturalism G9
Demonstrate problem solving abilities
G12
Ability to demonstrate leadership attributes
G13
Ability to apply knowledge into practice S1
Ability to show resilience S3
Ability to interpret engineering drawings S4
Ability to create processes to solve engineering problems S6
Ability to carry out civil engineering analysis S7
Ability to interpret engineering data S9
Ability to design civil engineering elements (e.g : structural, geoTech, water, transport &highway, env engr, etc)
S12
Ability to uphold safety
S14
Ability to integrate all civil engineering knowledge into a workable system G6
Ability to think critically, reflectively and innovatively
Med G8
Ability to carry out lifelong learning and continuous professional development
G10
Ability to initiate, plan, organise, implement and evaluate course of actions S8
Ability to utilise relevant design codes and regulations
S10
Ability to monitor the progress and quality of civil engineering works
S11
Ability to identify the appropriate construction technology and methods
S13
Ability to evaluate the impact of engineering decisions G2
Ability to use information and communication technology purposefully and responsibly
Low
G11
Ability to conduct research S2
Ability to utilize knowledge in science and mathematics (including statistics) S5
Ability to apply the knowledge of material science

10. META-profile & Our Programmes
Our responses have been documented in the package given for this meeting
General conclusion:
Some programs have more outcomes than the META-Profile competencies and some programs have fewer.
Many did the comparison by mapping the two (their outcomes and the META-profile competencies
Whilst many are able to match nicely, some programmes have more expected competencies compared to our META-Profile Competencies
Everyone will re-look at their amended programme outcomes and will do another comparison with the META-profile

11. Appreciating and Starting the 10 Step (Re)Design Tuning Approach
Agenda 3:
Appreciating and Starting the 10 Step (Re)Design Tuning Approach

12. 10 Steps in Summary 1 Name of the new or revised programme 6
Linking the degree with the agreed META-Profile 2
Length and the level of the programme 7
Define the structure of the programme 3
Explain the social need of the new or revised programme 8
Programme overall consistency 4
Future fields, sectors of employment of graduates 9
Internal Quality Control/Enhancement 5
Description of the degree profile (outcomes and competencies) 10
Other relevant aspects

13. Some Decisions/Findings
All university will (re) design their existing programmes
Good timing for a curriculum review
Applying the Tuning methodology to a brand new program (coming semester)
Applying the Tuning methodology as part of an existing curriculum review
As part of the Continual Quality Improvement (CQI)
All programmes are at Bachelor Degree
3/11 : 5 year program and 8/11: 4 year program

14. ACTIVITIES We spent time to review our programme outcomes.
We compared our existing programme structure
We shared our existing system
Comparing our existing program structure gave rise to other opportunities like benchmarking, mobility/exchange programs, dual/double/joint degree possibilities and others.

15. Detailing a Course Structure
Select one course
Write the course objective and the course synopsis
Come up with the Course Outcomes (CO) for this course
Determine the assessment method to measure the attainment of these course outcomes
Map each CO to your Programme Outcomes (PO)
Everyone has to repeat this for all their courses, before they can check on the consistency of their programme.

19. Checking the consistency Mapping CO to PO
Agenda 3:
STEP 8
Checking the consistency
Mapping CO to PO
We reminded each other, that they must have this mapping

20. STEP 8

23. OUR ACHIEVEMENT STEP Activity TIME 1
Name of the new or revised programme
Each university select one
Done 2
Length and the level of the programme
Each university decides 3
Explain the social needs of the new or revised programme
Each university explains 4
Future fields, sectors of employment of graduates 5
Description of the degree profile (outcomes and competencies)
Each university decides - based on existing or create new ones 6
Linking the degree with the agreed META-Profile
Revisit Task 2 7
Define the structure of the programme
Must also define course outcomes for each course
Continue and complete 8
Programme overall consistency
Mapping of courses (learning outcomes) to programme outcomes/competencies
For next meeting 9
Internal Quality Control/Enhancement 10
Other relevant aspects

24. Agenda 4:
Publication

25. DISCUSSION ON PUBLICATION
We have to write a report for Civil Engineering SAG
We need to plan for the report
Is there any possibility of a journal publication?

26. Structure of the Report
Content
Time line
Task 1
Introduction
Sept 2018
Coordinator 2
Generic & Specific Competences
Norhazilan 3
Consultation and Reflections 4
Meta-Profiles* 5
Programe Design*
February 2019
To be determined 6
Student’s Work Load* 7
Implementation Experience
July 2019
USM 8
Reflections of the TUNING methodology* 9
Conclusions
* : Each team member will write their own report for compilation later

27. THANK YOU “Happy TUNING”
See you in Bangkok in Sept 2018