1. Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 29-36 (January 2013)
Implantation and follow-up of totally subcutaneous versus conventional implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: A multicenter case-control study 
Julia Köbe, MD, Florian Reinke, MD, Christian Meyer, MD, Dong-In Shin, MD, Eimo Martens, MD, Stefan Kääb, MD, Andreas Löher, MD, Susanne Amler, MSc, Artur Lichtenberg, MD,PhD, Joachim Winter, MD,PhD, Lars Eckardt, MD,PhD 
Heart Rhythm 
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
DOI: /j.hrthm
Copyright © 2013 Heart Rhythm Society Terms and Conditions

2. Figure 1
Results of intraoperative defibrillation capacity testing. ⊕ = successful termination; ∅ = nonsuccessful termination; CPR = cardiopulmonary resuscitation; ICD = implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; S-ICD = subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.
Heart Rhythm  , 29-36DOI: ( /j.hrthm )
Copyright © 2013 Heart Rhythm Society Terms and Conditions

3. Figure 2
Severe hematoma after subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation requiring revision.
Heart Rhythm  , 29-36DOI: ( /j.hrthm )
Copyright © 2013 Heart Rhythm Society Terms and Conditions

4. Figure 3
Example of detection and conversion of ventricular fibrillation.
Heart Rhythm  , 29-36DOI: ( /j.hrthm )
Copyright © 2013 Heart Rhythm Society Terms and Conditions

5. Figure 4
Example of T-wave oversensing, inappropriate device discharge.
Heart Rhythm  , 29-36DOI: ( /j.hrthm )
Copyright © 2013 Heart Rhythm Society Terms and Conditions

6. Figure 5
Example of electromagnetic interference, nonsustained episode.
Heart Rhythm  , 29-36DOI: ( /j.hrthm )
Copyright © 2013 Heart Rhythm Society Terms and Conditions