1. Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages 206-213 (February 2002)
Computerised Assessment of Maximum Urinary Flow: an Efficient, Consistent and Valid Approach 
Wim P.J Witjes, Jean J.M.C.H de la Rosette, Annelise van den Berg-Segers, David Colongo, Gary Koch, Alexandre R Zlotta, Alexandre Colau, Michel J.A.M de Wildt, Hessel Wijkstra 
European Urology 
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
DOI: /S (01)

2. Fig. 1
Examples of flowcurves and their maximum flow values as evaluated by computer and experts: (a) (Dantec flowmeter), local flowmeter value: 6.1ml/s, computer value: 5.9ml/s; expert 1: 6.0ml/s, expert 2: 5.0ml/s, expert 3: 6.5ml/s; (b) (Dantec like flowmeter) local flowmeter value: 15.1ml/s, computer value: 12.8ml/s, expert 1: 14.3ml/s, expert 2: 13.0ml/s, expert 3: 11.8ml/s; (c) (other than Dantec flowmeter), local flowmeter value: not given, computer value: 4.5ml/s, expert 1: 2.7ml/s, expert 2: 6.0ml/s, expert 3: 2.5ml/s.
European Urology  , DOI: ( /S (01) )