Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Union Pacific Corp. Investment Research

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Union Pacific Corp. Investment Research"— Presentation transcript:

1 Union Pacific Corp. Investment Research
Tang, Nianfan Tian, Haoyun Wang, Yibing Investment Managers, RCMP November 15, 2018

2 Agenda Introduction Stock Market Prospects
Macroeconomic factors and Industry Overview Company Overview Financial Analysis Financial Projections Valuations Recommendation

3 Stock Market’s Prospect
Union Pacific Corporation Current Share Price (11/13/18) $ Market Capacity $ B 52 Week Range $ P/E (TTM) 9.77 EPS (TTM) $ 15.22 Trailing Annual Dividend & Yield $ 2.92 (1.98%) Portfolio Weight by Cost Portfolio Weight by Value Source: Yahoo Finance

4 Company Overview Union Pacific Corporation (NYSE:UNP) is one of America's leading transportation companies. Its principal operating company, Union Pacific Railroad, is North America's premier railroad franchise. Fast Facts About UPR Founded in 1862 Has the largest railroad network of 32,122 route miles Covering 23 states across the western 2/3 of the United States The only railroad serving all six major Mexico gateways 8,573 locomotives and 64,191 freight cars 42,000 employees 10,000 customers Source: UNP Annual Report, UNP official website

5 Key Macroeconomic Drivers
Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (US) Source: IBISWorld Source: Energy Information Administration Source:

6 Key Macroeconomic Drivers
X Trains use diesel as fuel. Operating expense X Fuel is one of the Rail Transportation industry’s primary cost. Industry revenue X Fuel surcharges are used by operators to limit the effects of volatile increases in fuel costs and to pass risk to customers. Oil Price Decreases 1. Fuel Surcharges X The fuel surcharges are part of revenue. X Coal is one of the industry’s largest commodity group 2. Freight Volume of Coal The demand for coal would decrease because it is a kind of substitute for oil. X X Trains would become a less cost-effective shipment option. 3. Demand of Services X The demand for rail transportation industry services would decrease. The oil price has big influences on industry revenue.

7 Industry Overview Supply Industries Demand Industries
Petroleum Refining Rail Maintenance Services Train, Subway & Transit Car Manufacturing Demand Industries Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting Mining Coal Ming Manufacturing Petrochemical Manufacturing Car & Automobile Manufacturing Coal & Natural Gas Power Source: IBISWorld U.S. Total Carload & Intermodal Originated Rail Traffic Source: Association of American Railroads  Source: United States Department of Transportation 

8 Industry Overview Freight Commodity Statistics
Downward trends of the freight volume of Crude Petroleum and Coal from 2015. Mainly due to the sharp decrease of crude oil price. Source: Association of American Railroads 

9 Industry Overview Competition
Different Operating Areas Different Revenue Mix Highly concentrated: the top four players account for 85.6% of revenue Source: IBISWorld Source: Association of American Railroads 

10 Porter’s Five Forces Threat of New Entrants Threat of New Entrants Low
Very High level of capital intensity Very High entry barrier Very Few new entrants Threat of New Entrants Low Bargaining Power of Buyers Customers can easily switch to other railroad transportation companies or substitutes if the price is too high. Facing competition with respect to price, transit times, quality and reliability of service from substitutes and other railroads. Rivalry Among Existing Competitors Highly-concentrated and maintained market share Operating in different areas Supplier Power Medium Buyer Power Medium Rivalry Low Threat of Substitutes Motor carrier, ships, barge operators, pipelines and air transportation, etc. Railroad is the most cost-effective and quick way to transport bulk freight over large distances. Bargaining Power of Suppliers Only two key domestic suppliers of high horsepower locomotives If any one discontinues operations, companies would experience significant cost and risk increase. Threat of Substitutes Medium Source: UNP Annual Report, IBISWorld US

11 Industry Dynamics Positive Positive Neutural Neutural Negative
Save $ 6b and strongly boost UP’s financial performance, setting a all-time high of EPS Positive As the only railroad serving all 6 gateways to Mexico, UP deserves better prospect Neutural Agriculture, Industrial (Plastics) and Intermodal volume grow Concerns on Energy(Coal) and Autos Neutural Competitors(CSX and CP) has greatly improved operating ratio UP starts imitating them to optimize its efficiency Negative Uncertainty of Asian trade, especially on intermodals If agreement could be made, volume will increase with expected higher US exports Tax Cuts and Job Act, 2017 New NAFTA Economic growth Hunter Harrison’s Precision Scheduled Railroading Plan CHINA-US Trade War

12 Business Analysis Total Revenue was $21.24 billion in 2017 consisting of 93% of Freight Revenue. Freight revenue : freight moves from origin to destination, generated from six commodity groups, Industrial, Agricultural, Chemical, Coal, Automotive and Intermodal. No cost of goods sold. Operating income = Revenue– Operating expense. Freight Revenue in 2017 Freight Revenue in 2017 Source: UNP Annual Report, Bloomberg

13 Revenue and Revenue Ton Mile
Important indicator specific to rail industry: Revenue ton-miles = weight of goods * miles. Eg: 40 tons of goods *30 miles= 120 Revenue ton-miles Freight Revenue (in mm) Revenue = P* Q Q: Revenue ton miles P: Freight Revenue /Revenue Ton Miles, keeps almost same from 2014 to 2016. Revenue Ton Miles(in mm) Freight Revenue /Revenue Ton Miles Source: UNP Annual Report, Bloomberg, Energy Information Agency

14 Revenue and Revenue Ton Mile
Another indicator used to reflect “Q”: Carloads/Volume. Similar past trend in carload and revenue ton-mile. Main contributors to jump in revenue in 2015 & 2016:coal and industrial products. Factors influence coal group: low natural gas (substitute of coal) price. Factors influence industrial group: energy price, drilling activity, shipment of steel and frac sand. Carloads Growth rate of carloads in different units Brent Crude Oil Price Source: UNP Annual Report, Bloomberg, Daily FX

15 Freight Revenue Breakdown
Revenue Analysis Percent of revenue generating from coal unit kept decreasing from 23% to 13%. Highly correlated to the oil price Freight Revenue Breakdown Crude Oil Price Source: UNP Annual Report, Bloomberg, Energy Information Agency

16 Operating Expenses Analysis
Operating ratio = Operating expense/ Revenue. Declining operating ratio. Also has high correlation with energy price. Management plan: reduce operating ratio to 60% in 2020. Operating Expense (in mm) Growth rate of operating expense Operating Ratio Source: UNP Annual Report, Bloomberg

17 Operating Expenses Analysis
Compensation and benefits accounts for more than 1/3. Layoff in the past did not reduce compensation and benefits effectively. Management plan: job cuts in 2018. Our projection: job cuts may not result in decrease of operating ratio immediately. Number of Employees Operating Expense Breakdown Operating Expenses: Compensation and benefits Source: UNP Annual Report, Bloomberg

18 Operating Expenses Analysis
Locomotives: a powered rail vehicle used for pulling trains. Freight Cares: trains carrying goods. Negative growth rate in Equipment and other rents since 2014. Higher percent of owned trains. Freight Cars Locomotives Operating Expense: Equipment and other rents Source: UNP Annual Report, Bloomberg

19 Profitability Analysis
Representative Figure ROA&ROE 2008 2014 2017 ROE 15.07% 24.43% 20.71% ROA 6.01% 10.15% 8.17% Operating Margin 22.68% 36.49% 37.95% Net Income Margin 13.01% 21.59% 21.83% Asset Turnover & Leverage Ratio Margins Source: UNP Annual Report, Bloomberg

20 Profitability Analysis
Net Income Basic EPS over $4 since 2012. Continuous growth in dividends. Basic EPS Dividends Source: UNP Annual Report, Bloomberg

21 Benchmark Analysis Revenue(in mm) Net Income(in mm) Revenue GAGR(5y)
Net Income Margin Market Cap ROA ROE Union Pacific Corp. 21,240 10,712 1.66% 26.6% 50.4% B 9.0% 47.8% CSX Corp. 11,408 5,471 -0.67% 24.2% 48.0% 58.42 B 6.8% 41.4% Norfolk Southern Corp. 10,551 5,404 -1.14% 23.0% 51.2% 45.91B 6.3% 37.6% Canadian National Railway 13,041 5,484 7.63% 17.4% 42.1% 61.83 B 9.3% 34.8% Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd 6,554 2,405 4.83% 33.4% 36.7% 29.33 B 8.7% 43.5% Kanas City Southern 2,583 962 4.24% 23.8% 37.2% 10.51 B 6.4% 20.8% Source: UNP Annual Report, Bloomberg,Yahoo Finance

22 Benchmark Analysis “Tax Act” in Dec.2017 enabled net income increase for all companies. Economies of scale The larger the size, the higher the profitability ratio. ROA Rank Size ROA ROE Net income margin Union Pacific Corp. 1 2 Canadian National Railway 3 4 CSX Corp. Northfolk Southern Corp. 6 Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd 5 Kanas City Southern Net Income Margin ROE Source: UNP Annual Report, Bloomberg

23 S W O T SWOT Analysis Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats
Duopoly in Western Area Diversified Business mix Largest Railroad Network Solid Customer Base The Only Railroad Serving All Six Major Mexico Gateways Weaknesses Cyclical Influenced by Oil Price S W O T Opportunities New Tech to Improve Transportation Efficiency Positive Domestic Economy Upward Trend of Intermodal Trade talk with Mexico Threats Decreasing Coal Freight Volume Competition from BNSF & Substitutes High Volatility of Oil Price Policy & Regulation Risks Potential Trade War

24 Management Plan Announced Plans Actions Taking
Unified 2020: Set goal of 60% operating ratio Share Buyback: AVG 30m shares per year since 2014, ASR 36m of price $ 140 in June 2018, AVG 10m during Dividend: 119 consecutive years, record high, target 40% payout ratio Consolidate 3 operating regions to 2 Reduce operating service units from 17 down to 12 Since August, 625 locomotives are removed and another 150 will be taken out this year Workforce volume will go down, estimated 500 job cuts in 2018 ASR Sources: 10-K, 2017; 3Q UNP 2018 Earning report, 3Q UNP investor’s conference call

25 Financial Projection - Base
In Millions of USD except Per Share FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Est FY 2019 Est FY 2020 Est FY 2021 Est FY 2022 Est FY 2023 Est 12 Months Ending 12/31/2013 12/31/2014 12/31/2015 12/31/2016 12/31/2017 12/31/2018 12/31/2019 12/31/2020 12/31/2021 12/31/2022 12/31/2023 Revenue 21,963.0 23,988.0 21,813.0 19,941.0 21,240.0 22,871.8 24,244.1 25,213.9 25,970.3 26,489.7 27,019.5 % growth 9.2% -9.1% -8.6% 6.5% 7.7% 6% 4% 3% 2% Agricultural Energy Industrial Premium other - Operating Expenses 14,517.0 15,235.0 13,761.0 12,669.0 13,392.8 14,397.8 15,031.3 15,380.5 15,582.2 15,893.8 16,211.7 4.9% -9.7% -7.9% 5.7% 7.5% 4.4% 2.3% 1.3% 2.0% Compensation and Benefits 5,161.0 4,750.0 4,984.0 5,358.0 5,593.8 5,723.7 5,798.7 5,914.7 6,033.0 Purchased services and materials 2,421.0 2,256.0 2,363.0 2,540.3 2,652.1 2,713.7 2,749.3 2,804.3 2,860.4 Depreciation 2,012.0 2,038.0 2,105.0 2,263.0 2,362.5 2,417.4 2,449.1 2,498.1 2,548.0 Fuel 2,013.0 1,489.0 1,891.0 2,032.9 2,122.3 2,171.6 2,200.1 2,244.1 2,289.0 Equipment and other rents 1,230.0 1,137.0 888.0 954.6 996.6 1,019.8 1,033.2 1,053.8 1,074.9 Other 924.0 997.0 948.0 1,019.1 1,064.0 1,088.7 1,103.0 1,125.0 1,147.5 Operating ratio 66% 64% 63% 62% 61% 60% EBIT 7,446.0 8,753.0 8,052.0 7,272.0 7,847.2 8,474.0 9,334.0 10,279.5 10,587.9 11,069.6 11,291.0 - Interest Expense 526.0 561.0 622.0 698.0 719.0 831.4 786.0 1,045.8 947.6 632.3 900.0 Income before tax 6,920.0 8,192.0 7,430.0 6,574.0 7,128.2 7,642.6 8,548.0 9,233.7 9,640.3 10,437.3 10,391.0 - Tax Expense 2,629.6 3,113.0 2,823.4 2,708.7 2,904.2 1,966.0 2,123.8 2,217.3 2,400.6 2,389.9 Net Income, Adjusted 4,290.4 5,079.0 4,606.6 4,075.9 4,419.5 4,738.4 6,581.9 7,110.0 7,423.0 8,036.7 8,001.1 Net Margin 20% 21% 27% 28% 29% 30% Diluted Weighted Avg Shares 931.5 901.1 869.4 835.4 798.4 732.0 720.0 710.0 700.0 690.0 Diluted EPS, Adjusted 4.61 5.64 5.30 4.88 5.54 6.47 9.14 9.87 10.45 11.48 11.60 Reference Items Dividends per Share 1.48 1.91 2.20 2.26 2.48 3.06 3.36 4.06 4.68 4.80 5.28 Total Cash Common Dividends 1,378.6 1,721.1 1,912.7 1,883.8 1,980.0 2,239.9 2,419.2 2,923.2 3,322.8 3,360.0 3,643.2 Dividend paypout ratio 32.1% 33.9% 41.5% 46.2% 44.8% 47.3% 36.8% 41.1% 41.8% 45.5% ROA 8.6% 9.7% 8.4% 7.3% 7.6% 8.1% 10.8% 11.2% 11.3% 11.7% ROE 20.2% 24.0% 22.3% 20.4% 17.8% 23.3% 28.0% 26.6% 24.9% 21.7% DEBT/EBITDA 1.0 1.1 1.4 1.6 1.7 2.1 1.8 1.5 1.3 EBITDA/Interest Expense 17.5 19.0 16.2 13.3 13.8 12.8 14.8 12.1 13.7 21.5 15.4 Depreciation Expense 1,777.0 1,904.0 2,204.2 2,283.2 2,362.2 2,441.2 2,520.2 2,599.2

26 Discounted Cash Flow Analysis
Upside Management Base Downside 1 Downside 2 % Revenue growth Operating ratio reach 60% in 2020 60% in 2021 60% in 2022 Discount rate 7.9% Exit EBITDA Multiple 12x 11.5x Implied perpetuity growth 3.4% 3.3% Valuation 170.9 157.1 146.86 127.05 121.4 WACC Target Capital Structure Debt-to-Total Capitalization 17% Equity-to-Total Capitalization 83% Cost of Debt Cost-of-Debt 5.0% Tax Rate 25.0% After-tax Cost of Debt 3.8% Cost of Equity Risk-free Rate (1) 3.4% Market Risk Premium (2) 5.5% Levered Beta 0.98 8.8% WACC 7.9% WACC Assumptions Cost of Debt: Select 5% based on YOY increasing effective interest rate by larger debt amount and indicated higher interest rate in the future(4.7% in 2017) Tax Rate: Include both Federal and State’s Risk-Free Rate: 30-year US Treasury Bond, Oct 2018 MRP: US equity market premium by KPMG, June 2018 Equity Beta: Select 0.98 from Bloomberg We select WACC as discount rate for no obvious business risk premium

27 Comparable Company Analysis
Comparable Companies Analysis - As of 11/9/2018 Company Name Enterprise Value ($b) Market Capitalization ($b) Share Price ($) EPS (ttm, $) P/E (ttm) P/S (ttm) EV/Revenue EV/EBITDA CSX Corporation (NasdaqGS:CSX) 68.93 59.67 70.66 7.53 9.39 4.98 5.76 11.55 Norfolk Southern Corporation (NYSE:NSC) 53.45 46.39 170.32 19.99 8.52 4.23 4.88 10.91 Kansas City Southern (NYSE:KSU) 13.43 10.42 102.42 9.91 10.33 3.89 5.01 10.35 Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (NYSE:CP) 34.42 29.68 208.73 12.46 16.75 5.62 6.52 12.63 Canadian National Railway Company (NYSE:CNI) 69.03 62.30 85.72 5.66 15.15 6.22 6.89 13.61 Lowest Mean 47.85 41.69 127.57 11.11 12.03 4.99 5.81 11.81 Median Highest Union Pacific Corporation (NYSE:UNP) 127.55 110.7 150.25 14.43 10.41 5.03 5.80 12.09 Comparing to Mean > < = UNP Valuation - Using Mean Multiples of COMPS Multiple Share Price ($) P/E (ttm) (1) 135.86 P/S (ttm) 149.00 EV/Revenue 150.61 EV/EBITDA 146.24 Range Current Share Price (as of 11/9/2018) 150 Note: (1) using the mean of CSX, NSC, and KSU Sources: Yahoo Finance, Companies Financial Reports

28 Dividend Discount Model Analysis
Cost of Equity Risk-free Rate (1) 3.4% Market Risk Premium (2) 5.5% Equity Beta (3) 0.98 8.8% CAGR of Dividends 16.4% LT-growth rate 6.0% Projected Dividend Per Share ($) PV(Dividend Per Share) ($) 2018E 3.06 3.02 2019E 3.36 3.05 2020E 4.06 3.39 2021E 4.68 3.59 2022E 4.80 3.38 2023E 5.28 3.42 Terminal Value 201.18 130.47 Sum of PV(Dividend Per Share) =Share Price $150.34 Current Share Price (As of 11/13/2018) $148.6 (1) 30-year US Treasury Bond, Oct 2018, sourced from Bloomberg (2) Sourced from KPMG, June 2018 (3) Sourced from Bloomberg Sources: Bloomberg, Dividends are adjusted for stock split. Sensitivity Test Cost of Equity $150.34 7.3% 7.8% 8.3% 8.8% 9.3% LT-growth Rate 5.25% 209.1 168.3 141.8 121.9 106.9 5.50% 235.8 184.8 153.1 129.9 112.9 5.75% 271.1 205.3 166.6 139.3 119.7 6.00% 320.0 231.5 183.0 150.3 127.6 6.25% 392.2 266.1 203.5 163.6 136.8 6.50% 509.4 314.1 229.8 179.7 147.7 6.75% 733.3 384.8 264.6 199.8 160.6

29 Final Recommendation: Hold
Summary $ $ Valuation Range: $ 140 – 160, Current Price: $ as of 11/13 Total Shareholder’s Return: EPS of $11.6 in ’23 equate to a $ stock at 18-20x, 40% - 45% upside, 9.32% - 10% IRR Final Recommendation: Hold

30 Appendix – Comps Benchmark
Company Name Enterprise Value ($b) Market Capitalization ($b) Share Price ($) EPS (ttm, $) D/Total MKT Cap Operating Ratio(3Q) LTM EBIT, 1 Yr Growth % LTM Net Income, 1 Yr Growth % LTM Total Debt/Capital % LTM Total Debt/EBITDA LTM EBITDA Margin % LTM EBIT Margin % LTM Net Income Margin % LTM Total Revenues, 1 Yr Growth % CSX Corporation (NasdaqGS:CSX) 68.93 59.67 70.66 7.53 17.3% 58.7% 23.9% 269.3% 50.1% 2.30 49.9% 38.8% 55.2% 3.4% Norfolk Southern Corporation (NYSE:NSC) 53.45 46.39 170.32 19.99 18.1% 65.4% 18.9% 217.6% 37.5% 2.00 44.7% 34.9% 52.4% 7.1% Kansas City Southern (NYSE:KSU) 13.43 10.42 102.42 9.91 20.4% 62.0% 7.6% 88.6% 34.6% 2.10 48.4% 35.8% 38.0% 6.3% Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (NYSE:CP) 34.42 29.68 208.73 12.46 22.4% 58.3% 10.8% 32.4% 53.8% 51.6% 42.7% 34.0% 8.4% Canadian National Railway Company (NYSE:CNI) 69.03 62.30 85.72 5.66 16.4% 59.5% -2.5% 43.9% 40.6% 1.80 50.6% 41.0% 42.2% 4.4% AVG 47.85 41.69 127.57 11.11 60.8% 11.7% 130.4% 43.3% 49.0% 38.6% 44.3% 5.9% Union Pacific Corporation (NYSE: UNP) 127.50 190.00 150.00 12.21 17.0% 63.5% 8.9% 150.1% 53.4% 2.20 47.9% 38.2% 51.3% 6.2% Train Speed Dwell Time CSX Corporation (NasdaqGS:CSX) 17.9 9 Norfolk Southern Corporation (NYSE:NSC) 19.4 25.5 Kansas City Southern (NYSE:KSU) 26.2 26.6 Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (TSX:CP) 22.9 6.2 Canadian National Railway Company (TSX:CNR) 16.5 AVG UNP 23.9 BNSF 23.7 27.6

31 Appendix – DCF Sensitivity Analysis
Stock Price Sensitivity Table $ Discount rate 7.4% 7.9% 8.4% EBITDA 11.5x 168.2 164.1 160.1 Exit 12.0x 175.2 170.9 166.8 Multiple 12.5x 182.2 177.8 173.4 Stock Price Sensitivity Table $ Discount rate 7.4% 7.9% 8.4% EBITDA 11.5x 161.1 157.1 153.2 Exit 12.0x 167.8 163.7 159.7 Multiple 12.5x 174.5 170.2 166.1 Stock Price Sensitivity Table $ Discount rate 7.4% 7.9% 8.4% EBITDA 11.0x 144.3 140.7 137.2 Exit 11.5x 150.6 146.9 143.2 Multiple 12.0x 156.9 153.1 149.3 Upside Management Base Stock Price Sensitivity Table $ Discount rate 7.4% 7.9% 8.4% EBITDA 11.0x 124.8 121.6 118.5 Exit 11.5x 130.3 127.0 123.8 Multiple 12.0x 135.9 132.5 129.2 Stock Price Sensitivity Table $ Discount rate 7.4% 7.9% 8.4% EBITDA 11.0x 119.2 116.2 113.2 Exit 11.5x 124.6 121.4 118.3 Multiple 12.0x 130.0 126.7 123.5 Downside 1 Downside 2

32 Appendix - Relevered Equity Beta
Comparable Companies Unlevered Beta Predicted Market Debt/ Marginal Unlevered Company Levered Beta (4) Value of Debt Value of Equity Equity Tax Rate Beta Kansas City Southern (NYSE:KSU) 0.89 $2,690.0 $10,510.4 25.6% 25% 0.77 CSX Corporation (NasdaqGS:CSX) 1.18 11,800.0 56,424.2 20.9% 1.02 Norfolk Southern Corporation (NYSE:NSC) 1.09 9,736.0 43,956.3 22.1% 0.93 Canadian National Railway Company (TSX:CNR) 0.96 11,870.0 60,578.5 19.6% 38% 0.83 Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (TSX:CP) 1.27 8,155.0 28,275.5 28.8% 1.04 Mean 1.08 23.4% 0.92 Median UNP Relevered Beta Target Relevered Relevered Beta 20.6% 25.0% 1.06 Sources: Bloomberg, KPMG, CIQ, Companies Financial Reports


Download ppt "Union Pacific Corp. Investment Research"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google