Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Environmental Ethics and Philosophy

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Environmental Ethics and Philosophy"— Presentation transcript:

1 Environmental Ethics and Philosophy
Are There Universal Ethical Principles? Universalists: Plato, Kant believe that fundamental principles of ethics are universal, unchanging and eternal Relativists: Sophists- everything contextual. Believe that moral principles are always relative to a particular person Nihilists: Schopenhauer- arbitrary survival. Claim that the world makes no sense at all and that everything is completely arbitrary Utilitarians: Bentham ( )- maximum pleasure, greatest good for greatest number of people Values, Rights, and Obligations Moral agents. Some philosophers believe that only humans are moral agents Moral subjects. Children are considered moral subjects not moral agents Moral extensionism Inherent, instrumental value Non-living things, do they have value?

2 Modernism and Postmodernism
Descartes, Bacon, Newton: hope for universal laws of morality Environmental ethics is arbitrary and shifting and that there is no grand narrative of history and no universal philosophy; Derrida, Lyotard, Foucalt

3 Worldviews and Ethical Perspectives
Individual beliefs towards ecology depends on ethical perspectives Most people have set of core values or beliefs Environmental concerns are a source for comparisons among different values and perceptions Domination Lynn White, Jr. (1967) domination over nature Interpretation of religious values has lead in past to anthropocentric (human-centered) ecological principles which believe that humans are the focus of creation Current movement in religious organizations to fight for ecological concerns Stewardship Responsibility to manage our ecosystem. To work together with human and non-human forces to sustain life

4 Biocentrism (life-centered), Animal Rights, and Ecocentrism (ecologically-centered)
Muir, Leopold- support idea of biocentrism, biodiversity is the highest ethical value in nature Ecocentric: whole is more important than individual animal Animal rights supporters focus on the individual Ecofeminism Warren, Shiva, Merchant, Ruether, and King A network of personal relationships

5 Table 2.1 Worldviews and ethical perspectives -- A comparison
Philosophy Intrinsic Value Instrumental Value Role of humans Anthropocentric Humans Nature Masters Stewardship Humans & Nature Tools Caretakers Biocentric Species Abiotic nature One of many Animal rights Individuals Processes Equals Ecocentric Processes Individuals Destroyers Ecofeminist Relationships Roles Caregivers

6 Environmental Justice
Combination of civil rights and environmental protection that demands a safe , healthy life-giving environment for everyone Most people of low socio-economic position are exposed to high pollution levels 36% (1994) of minority populations lived near hazardous waste sites

7 Environmental Racism Unequal distribution of hazardous waste based on race Black children 2-3 times more likely to have lead poisoning Dumping Across Borders Toxic colonialism: targeting third/fourth world countries for waste disposal Polluting industries move to poor countries, e.g. Mexico Environmental Justice Act (1992)

8 Are Green Organizations Too White?
National People of Color Environmental Leadership Summit (1991) Most mainstream environmental groups do not represent inner city residents

9 Is Nature Fragile or Resilient?
Nature seen as powerful in past Nature seen as a delicate balance as technology increases our ability to disrupt

10

11 Science as a Way of Knowing
A Faustian Bargain? Technology can create power to save and destroy life Dr. Faustus sold his soul to the devil in exchange for power and wealth

12 What Is Science? Scientific method Ordered observations to describe the physical world and solve problems Testing Hypotheses Experiments expose variables as possible causes and help in formulation of a hypothesis that explains a sequence of events Leads to a theory that postulates general principles about the events Descriptive and Interpretive Science Laboratory simulations and field studies help describe events not directly available for testing with basic five senses Holistic/interpretive science: describe biases, which are always present Proof Is Elusive All data is conditionally interpreted and open to revision

13

14 Technology and Progress
Neo-Luddites: view based on Ned Ludd, view that modern technology eventually fails Appropriate Technology E.F. Schumacher (1973) published a book “Small is Beautiful”- building of tools and technology for sites where people live now Promotion of safe, creative, environmentally sound, emotionally satisfying work

15 Summary Universalists: people who think eternally valid moral laws and ethics exist Nihilists disagree with Universalists Relativists: contextual Utilitarians: greatest good to greatest number Postmodernists: everything is socially constructed Ecofeminists: patriarchal systems cause environmental/social destruction Anthropocentrists: focus on humans Biocentrists: everything has value Ecocentrists: focus on ecological processes Science can take many forms; interpretive sciences are more holistic Technology can support advances and declines in world ecology Appropriate technology may provide more options in avoiding environmental problems


Download ppt "Environmental Ethics and Philosophy"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google