Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byTobias Andersen Modified over 6 years ago
1
Modeling of present and Eemian stable water isotopes in precipitation
Jesper Sjolte PhD student Sigfús J Johnsen Centre for Ice and Climate Niels Bohr Institute University of Copenhagen Denmark Georg Hoffmann LSCE CEA/CNRS Saclay France
2
Variability of seasonal and annual data
Overview REMOiso The regional model Model setup, domain, 'nudging' ect. Climatology Precipitation and accumulation Temperature and isotopes Variability of seasonal and annual data Temperature and precipitation Annual and seasonal mean δ18O Main patterns of variability PCA of model output Relation with the NAO
3
Variability of seasonal and annual data
Overview REMOiso The regional model Model setup, domain, 'nudging' ect. Climatology Precipitation and accumulation Temperature and isotopes Variability of seasonal and annual data Temperature and precipitation Annual and seasonal mean δ18O Main patterns of variability PCA of model output Relation with the NAO
4
REMOiso Model setup SSTs from meteorologic re-analysis or climatic
reconstruction Global model with isotopes REMOiso REMOiso Regional climate model fitted with isotope diagnostics Three different kinds of water H216O, H218O, HD16O ERA-40 re-analysis
5
Model domain ~55km resolution
6
Variability of seasonal and annual data
Overview REMOiso The regional model Model setup, domain, 'nudging' ect. Climatology Precipitation and accumulation Temperature and isotopes Variability of seasonal and annual data Temperature and precipitation Annual and seasonal mean δ18O Main patterns of variability PCA of model output Relation with the NAO
7
Precipitation: accumulation maps
8
Precipitation: mean annual cycle
REMOiso Observations
9
Precipitation: mean annual cycle
=
10
Spatial isotope-temperature slope
11
Climatology summary Precipitation Temperature Isotopes
REMOiso captures the overall spatial accumulation pattern The differences in seasonal cycle along the Greenland coast is well represented by the model Temperature There is a warm bias of ~5°C in the central parts of the ice sheet Isotopes The modeled spatial slope for Greenland (0.70 ‰ per °C) is lower than the observed (0.81 ‰ per °C) The warm bias of the temperatures is reflected by the less depleted isotopes
12
Variability of seasonal and annual data
Overview REMOiso The regional model Model setup, domain, 'nudging' ect. Climatology Precipitation and accumulation Temperature and isotopes Variability of seasonal and annual data Temperature and precipitation Annual and seasonal mean δ18O Main patterns of variability PCA of model output Relation with the NAO
13
Variability of seasonal data
Percentage of inter-annual seasonal variability explained by the model for temperature and precipitation Summer: May-Oct Winter: Nov-Apr
14
GRIP 1990-1993 DYE3 1980-1983 δ18O time series Snow pit Snow pit
REMOiso REMOiso
15
Reykjavik δ18O time series
GNIP data REMOiso
16
Seasonal ice core δ18O Ice core data REMOiso
17
Seasonal mean ice core δ18O
REMOiso Ice core data
18
δ18O and d-ecxess d-excess = δD-8*δ180
19
δ18O and d-ecxess δ180 d-excess
20
Coastal δ18O and d-ecxess mean annualcycle
21
Site G δ18O and d-ecxess mean annualcycle
22
Precipitation and temperature
Variability summary Precipitation and temperature During winter 5% to 81% of the temperature variability is explained by the model, while for precipitation 2% to 61% is explained The model results are more in line with observations, where the re- analysis is expected to be most realistic Isotopes Up to 30% of the winter variability is explained by the model (Reykjavik) Very depleted isotopic values are not captured by the model Local effects e.g. sastrugi make comparison with ice cores data difficult d-excess annunal cycle for agree for coastal areas but not for Site G
23
Variability of seasonal and annual data
Overview REMOiso The regional model Model setup, domain, 'nudging' ect. Climatology Precipitation and accumulation Temperature and isotopes Variability of seasonal and annual data Temperature and precipitation Annual and seasonal mean δ18O Main patterns of variability PCA of model output Relation with the NAO
24
Principal Component Analysis: EOFs of model output
25
PCA of model output Bo Vinther et al. submitted
26
PCA of model output
27
NAO correlation maps
28
Patterns of variability summary
EOF patters The pattern for temperature is largely unimodal for Greenland with exception of the east coast The precipitation pattern has a strong east-west contrast Isotopes looks like a mixture of the temperaure and the precipitation pattern, and matches the pattern found in ice core data NAO The PC1s for winter data are highly correlated with the NAO Temperature R2 = 0.44 δ18O R2 = 0.21 Precipitation R2 = 0.25 Furthermore the correlation maps for NAO resembles the PC patterns
29
Overview ECHAMiso The global model Modeled anomalies Model setup
Temperature and isotope maps Seasonal cycle Coparison to ice core data
30
Overview ECHAMiso The global model Modeled anomalies Model setup
Temperature and isotope maps Seasonal cycle Coparison to ice core data
31
Eemian experiments 115kyr, 122kyr and 126kyr
Global experiments Eemian experiments 115kyr, 122kyr and 126kyr ECHAMiso 4.5, T42 resolution ~2.8 degrees Present ice sheet configuration ect. Climatologic SSTs from IPSL_CM4 coupled model Model runs: years Orbital parameters adjusted to paleo-values Preindustrial greenhouse gas levels p(CO2) = 280ppm
32
Overview ECHAMiso The global model Modeled anomalies Model setup
Temperature and isotope maps Seasonal cycle Coparison to ice core data
33
Eemian temperatures years BP years BP years BP
34
Comparison with proxy temperatures
35
Eemian 18O years BP years BP years BP
36
Temperature anomalies
37
18O anomalies
38
18O – temperature relation
[degree C/per mil]
39
SWI compared with ice core data
ECHAMiso o Ice core data *
40
Summary: Eemian experiments
Simulated Eemian peak summer temperatures for the Northern Hemisphere fit the proxy data well Limited response in simulated temperature for Antarctica Simulated18O/D amplitude is too small compared to ice core data Less of the 18O variability is explained by temperature for the 'warm' time slices 122kyr and 126kyr Ice sheet dynamics, fresh water discharge and vegetation changes should be incorporated in future experiments to achieve more realistic boundary conditions
41
Updating REMOiso physics Palaeo experiments with REMOiso
What's next Updating REMOiso physics Palaeo experiments with REMOiso Holocene LGM Eemian
42
THANK YOU!
43
The 'nudging' technique The global model and the regional model are forced to follow the upper level flow of the re-analysis
44
The 'nudging' technique Daily temperatures from NorthGRIP 2nd half of 1997
45
Annual mean accumulation
Ice core data REMOiso
46
Annual mean ice core δ18O Ice core data REMOiso
47
Positive NAO Deep icelandic low and strong subtropical high
48
Negative NAO Weak icelandic low and weak subtropical high
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.