1. Role of conservative management in traumatic aortic injury: Comparison of long-term results of conservative, surgical, and endovascular treatment 
Victor X. Mosquera, MD, Milagros Marini, MD, PhD, José M. Lopez-Perez, MD, PhD, Javier Muñiz-Garcia, MD, PhD, José M. Herrera, MD, PhD, Ignacio Cao, MD, José J. Cuenca, MD 
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Volume 142, Issue 3, Pages (September 2011)
DOI: /j.jtcvs
Copyright © 2011 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

2. Figure 1
Flowchart depicts the modification in patient management since the use of emergency aortic endografting at the Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña.
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.jtcvs )
Copyright © 2011 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

3. Figure 2
Kaplan–Meier survival curves of conservative, surgical, and endovascular groups, including in-hospital mortality. There is a clear trend toward a greater long-term survival in the endovascular group, without being statistically significant (P = .59).
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.jtcvs )
Copyright © 2011 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

4. Figure 3
Cumulative survival free from aortic-related complications in the surviving patients of the conservative group after hospital discharge (n = 29).
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.jtcvs )
Copyright © 2011 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions