Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Principles of Evidence

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Principles of Evidence"— Presentation transcript:

1 Principles of Evidence
Display slide. Say “Welcome to the Professional Conduct session of the CLEAR Learning NCIT Basic course.” Introduce yourself, including a brief overview of your credentials and history with CLEAR. National Certified Investigator & Inspector Training Basic Program Instructor Name Agency

2 Law of Evidence Common Law Statutory Code

3 Rules of Evidence A system of rules of when, how and whether a piece of information can be used in a trial Whether or not the strict rules of evidence will apply in a regulatory case depends on the legislation governing that profession

4 Why? Consistency Reliability Fairness

5 Definitions Evidence Probative Admissibility

6 Categories Direct Circumstantial

7 Direct Establishes fact in issue directly Eyewitness

8 Circumstantial Indirectly establishes a fact Series of facts
Reasonable inference

9 Forms Real Testimonial Demonstrative Judicial Notice

10 Real Tangible Objects Documentary Physical Scientific

11 Real Evidence - Issues Best Evidence Rule Authentication

12 Best Evidence Rule To prove the contents of a writing, the most original document is best Applies to: Documents Recordings Photographs Correspondence

13 Administrative Proceedings
Duplicate is allowable to the same extent as the original unless an issue is raised as to: (i) authenticity, or (ii) fairness

14 Authentication The process of establishing at a trial or hearing that something is what you claim it to be.

15 Authentication What requires authentication?
How do you authenticate an item? Testimony Personal Knowledge Distinctive markings, chain of custody Stipulation Evidence Act

16 Process of Authentication
Identify Source Proof of Source Document Custody Document Condition Prepare Receipt

17 Testimonial Lay Expert

18 Testimonial - Lay Presumed to be competent to testify
Personal knowledge Oath or affirmation

19 Testimonial - Expert Average person unable to make reasoned judgment without assistance of an expert Competency to testify is not presumed; must be qualified Frequently used in administrative cases

20 Testimonial Evidence Credibility Bias Interest Hostility

21 Demonstrative A representation or illustration intended to prove a material fact Used to aid testimonial evidence so as to give it more weight and make it more understandable

22 Judicial Notice When a commonly known or easily ascertainable fact is recognized as being true without requiring formal proof (e.g., what day of the week a particular date falls upon).

23 Materiality Has something substantive to do with an issue in the case

24 Relevancy Logical relevance Legal relevance

25 Evidence Acts Evidence Acts facilitate the use of evidence that would otherwise be excluded.

26 Admissibility of Evidence
The requirement that the evidence does not violate an exclusionary rule Types of exclusionary rules: Hearsay Prior consistent statements Oath helping

27 Privileges Solicitor-Client Public Policy Settlement Public interest
Litigation

28 Prejudicial Evidence Inflammatory Public policy concerns Similar acts
Subsequent remedial measures Similar acts

29 Prejudicial Evidence Excessive/Confusing/Cumulative Unfair surprise
Physical inconvenience Indecency

30 Hearsay Statement made outside of the trial or hearing by a person who is not a party to the proceeding that is offered in evidence to prove what was said is true

31 Why is Hearsay Suspect? No opportunity of cross-examine
Not under oath at the time statement was made Not in courtroom or hearing room when the statement was made Danger of inaccurate reporting

32 Exceptions Reliable and necessary
Not offered to prove what is said is true Former testimony Admission Declarations against interest

33 Exceptions Dying declarations Business Records Official Records
Past Recollection Recorded Res Gestae

34 Evidence in Administrative Cases
Sometimes, strict rules of evidence do not apply, but are often followed to some extent In cases where hearsay is allowed, it is often given limited weight and is usually not sufficient to support a finding on its own Privileged communications are typically excluded

35 Standard of Proof Balance of Probabilities
E.g.: it is more likely than not that

36 Sufficiency of Evidence
Burden of Proof Assessing Credibility

37 Assessing Credibility
Appearance or Demeanor Ability to perceive Ability to recall Motivation Probability Internal consistency External consistency

38 Judicial Scrutiny Challenge an agency action Degree of scrutiny
Appeal provided by statute Application for Judicial Review Degree of scrutiny Discretion? Expertise? Witness credibility? Nature of ruling?

39 Evidence Review Questions

40 The two broad classifications of evidence are direct and:
Review Question 1 The two broad classifications of evidence are direct and: Indirect Circumstantial Negligent Contextual

41 Review Question 2 The reasons for having rules of evidence are Consistency, Fairness, and: Reliability Admissibility Relevancy Materiality

42 “The most original document is best” is the definition of:
Review Question 3 “The most original document is best” is the definition of: Admissibility Direct Evidence The Best Evidence Rule Authentication

43 Principles of Evidence Summary (1 of 2)
The rules of evidence exist to ensure fairness, consistency and reliability Evidence is classified as direct or circumstantial Real evidence includes objects that can been seen and felt Most often, demonstrative evidence is used to support testimonial evidence

44 Principles of Evidence Summary (2 of 2)
The best evidence rule states that the most original evidence is best Authenticating evidence means proving that the information is what you claim it to be Privileged evidence is excluded from administrative hearings

45 NCIT Basic Evaluations
Principles of Evidence

46 In general, this instructor:
Unacceptable Needs to Improve Is Good Is Very Good Excellent

47 The style of delivery: Unacceptable Needs to Improve Is Good Is Very Good Excellent

48 The content: Unacceptable Needs to Improve Is Good Is Very Good Excellent

49 The amount of material covered:
Unacceptable Needs to Improve Is Good Is Very Good Excellent

50 The usefulness of this session :
Unacceptable Needs to Improve Is Good Is Very Good Excellent


Download ppt "Principles of Evidence"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google