Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byYandi Hermawan Modified over 6 years ago
2
time morphospace
3
time morphospace
4
Example: Feathers among vertebrate groups
* A B C O Shared, derived character synapomorphy * Example: Feathers among vertebrate groups
5
# A B C O * Everyone has the character It is ‘primitive’ in the phylogeny Shared-primitive character Symplesiomorphy Example: The number of limbs in terrestrial vertebrates
6
A B C O * How do you tell if a trait is primitive or derived? Outgroup
7
Principle of Parsimony
B C O * Principle of Parsimony Simpler explanation is more likely * Parsimony -- topology that minimizes total evolutionary change
8
A B C O * Vs. A B O C *
10
How to Construct Trees? Need characters morphological
mtDNA, cpDNA genera, species nuclear DNA -- classes, families, orders, genera rRNA -- kingdoms, phyla, classes Need a method for using the characters
11
a’bc’de’fg a’b’cdefg’
12
a’bc’de’fg a’b’cdefg’
a’ is shared ancestral a a’
13
a’bc’de’fg a’b’cdefg’
b b’ c c’ a’ is shared ancestral b’ and c’ are shared derived d’ e’ f’ and g’ are uninformative a a’
16
v v
17
A B C B C A B A C 3 species -- 3 possible trees
3 known, plus 4th possible trees 3 known, plus ,137,824 possible trees plus >>81023
18
How to find the “best” tree?
Sample 1000 trees find the best and search ‘near’ them avoid characteristics of the worst trees Break it up into smaller groups that can be searched, then combine groups, forcing your search to areas that maintain the branching you find in Add one at a time Algorithmic--searching for the best method for finding the tree
19
Maximum liklihood methods
Starts with a model of evolutionary change e.g. All base pair changes equally likely Transitions more likely than transversions 3rd base pair changes more likely than 1st base pair changes Synonymous changes more likely than non-synonymous changes Rules that imply probability Calculate the probability that a particular change occurred The tree that has the highest probability (i.e liklihood) is favored
20
Using Molecular Data Small number of character states (A,T, G, C) Reversions A G A will be frequent What do you do with mistakes? Homoplasy
21
A B C C B A A B C Phenomenon Phylogeny What it looks like parallel evolution convergence A B C D A B C D A D B C reversal A B C B C A C B A
22
How good is a method (e.g. parsimony) at uncovering the phylogeny?
23
Consider 4 taxa, trait is one codon: 1. GAA 2. GAA 3. GAT 4. GAT
AGGGGGGG GGGGGGAG CCCCCCCC TTTTTTCC Ancestral state GGGGGGGG
24
Length of A + B + C Length of D + E D E A C B
25
Types of characters morphological mtDNA, cpDNA genera, species nuclear DNA -- families, orders, genera rRNA -- phyla, classes Considerations: informative characters -- shared derived traits direction of change -- outgroup problems -- convergence, parallel evolution, reversal Methods parsimony maximum likelihood, etc.
26
What is the relation of systematics to classification?
Monophyletic Paraphyletic Polyphyletic all descendents of some, but not all, shared character common ancestor descendents not present in possess trait possess trait common ancestor
27
Classification that does not reflect
history is uninformative and misleading. It may lead to mistakes--certainly it is wrong
29
rates of evolutionary change -- Hawaiian honeycreepers
Uses of phylogenies rates of evolutionary change -- Hawaiian honeycreepers patterns of adaptive evolution -- hammerhead sharks classify diversity coevolution and cospeciation -- hosts and parasites comparative method
34
Sequence of character change: Evolution of hammerhead sharks Two hypothesized functions: - bowplane to increase lift while swimming - enhanced orientation and prey detection Martin 1997 Nature 364:494 921 bp mtDNA; eight hammerhead taxa plus outgroup
36
Using phylogenies to test for
cospeciation of host and parasite: Pocket gophers (Geomys spp.) and their lice (Geomydoecus spp.; Mallophaga) Hafner et al Science 265:1087 14 species of pocket gophers and associated lice species 379 bp of cytochrome oxidase I gene 134 polymorphic sites in gophers; 178 in lice
37
Gopher and louse phylogenies are significantly congruent
pocket gophers lice
38
The timing of diversification is significantly correlated in gophers and lice
39
Phylogenies congruent!!
but, are they?
41
Cyphomyrmex Myrmecocrypta Mycocepurus
42
A phylogeny represents the evolutionary history of a lineage in terms
in terms of when splits arose and how much descendant taxa differ from the ancestor Molecular sequence data have revolutionized the construction of phylogenies because they provide large numbers of simple characters Phylogenies are based on shared derived characters; ancestral vs. derived state is determined by comparison to an outgroup Parsimony is the most frequently used method for constructing phylogenies, but it may produce multiple equally parsimonious trees, especially if the number of taxa is large Robust phylogenies based on molecular data enable evolutionary biologists to address several types of questions
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.