Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRalph Wiggins Modified over 6 years ago
1
Claim A: Governing by fear is an effective method of control in Catching Fire.
Claim B: Governing by fear is not an effective method of control in Catching Fire. 2 minutes: Find two pieces of evidence for your position (judges: find one piece of evidence each) Jot down how you’ll explain it. Judges: Who had the better argument and why? Governing by fear
2
First, let’s practice! In your group, pick one.
Claim A: Tom Brady is the GOAT Claim B: Tom Brady is NOT the GOAT. Claim A: Beyoncé is the GOAT Claim B: Beyoncé is the GOAT Claim A: Students at HHS should have open campus at lunch. Claim B: Students at HHS should NOT have open campus at lunch. 2 minutes: Find two pieces of evidence for your position (judges: find one piece of evidence each) Jot down how you’ll explain it. Judges: Who had the better argument and why? First, let’s practice! In your group, pick one.
3
Claim A: Catching Fire shows us that censorship is an effective method of control.
Claim B: Catching Fire shows us that censorship is not an effective method of control. 2 minutes: Find two pieces of evidence for your position (judges: find one piece of evidence each) Jot down how you’ll explain it. Judges: Who had the better argument and why? Censorship
4
Claim A: Catching Fire shows us that there should be limits to the progress of technology.
Claim B: Catching Fire shows us that advances in technology should not be regulated. 2 minutes: Find two pieces of evidence for your position (judges: find one piece of evidence each) Jot down how you’ll explain it. Judges: Who had the better argument and why? Technology
5
Distraction (panem et circenses)
Claim A: The Capitol has power because citizens are distracted by the Hunger Games. Claim B: The Hunger Games are a symptom of the Capitol’s power, not the cause of it. 2 minutes: Find two pieces of evidence for your position (judges: find one piece of evidence each) Jot down how you’ll explain it. Judges: Who had the better argument and why? Distraction (panem et circenses)
6
Claim A: The citizens of Panem must sacrifice some freedoms for the sake of their safety and security. Claim B: The citizens of Panem should not sacrifice their freedoms for the sake of their safety and security. 2 minutes: Find two pieces of evidence for your position (judges: find one piece of evidence each) Jot down how you’ll explain it. Make your argument in 90 seconds Judges: Who had the better argument and why? Freedom vs. Security
7
Claim A: The Capitol’s system of separating Panem into districts is an effective method of maintaining power. Claim B: The Capitol’s system of separating Panem into districts is necessary to keep their society functioning. 2 minutes: Find two pieces of evidence for your position (judges: find one piece of evidence each) Jot down how you’ll explain it. Judges: Who had the better argument and why? Social class
8
Claim A: One way tributes can be more successful is to perform their gender in conventional ways (act “masculine” or “feminine”). Claim B: The way tributes express their gender has nothing to do with their success in the Hunger Games. 2 minutes: Find two pieces of evidence for your position (judges: find one piece of evidence each) Jot down how you’ll explain it. Judges: Who had the better argument and why? Gender
9
The media Claim A: The media keeps people in Panem obedient.
Claim B: The media does not keep people in Panem obedient. 2 minutes: Find two pieces of evidence for your position (judges: find one piece of evidence each) Jot down how you’ll explain it. Judges: Who had the better argument and why? The media
10
Art Claim A: Art is an effective method of protest in Catching Fire.
Claim B: Art is not an effective method of protest in Catching Fire. 2 minutes: Find two pieces of evidence for your position (judges: find one piece of evidence each) Jot down how you’ll explain it. Judges: Who had the better argument and why? Art
11
Claim A: Catching Fire shows us that injustice can never be applied equally.
Claim B: Catching Fire shows us that a corrupt justice system is an effective method of oppression. 2 minutes: Find two pieces of evidence for your position (judges: find one piece of evidence each) Jot down how you’ll explain it. Judges: Who had the better argument and why? Injustice
12
Claim A: Catching Fire shows us that the restriction of information is an effective method of control. Claim B: Catching Fire shows us that the restriction of information is not an effective method of control. 2 minutes: Find two pieces of evidence for your position (judges: find one piece of evidence each) Jot down how you’ll explain it. Judges: Who had the better argument and why? Education
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.