Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byΑμύντα Ευμελια Αργυριάδης Modified over 6 years ago
1
Volume 389, Issue 10080, Pages 1719-1729 (April 2017)
Computerised interpretation of fetal heart rate during labour (INFANT): a randomised controlled trial Peter Brocklehurst, David Field, Keith Greene, Ed Juszczak, Robert Keith, Sara Kenyon, Louise Linsell, Christopher Mabey, Mary Newburn, Rachel Plachcinski, Maria Quigley, Elizabeth Schroeder, Philip Steer Peter Brocklehurst, David Field, Keith Greene, Ed Juszczak, Robert Keith, Sara Kenyon, Louise Linsell, Christopher Mabey, Mary Newburn, Rachel Plachcinski, Maria Quigley, Elizabeth Schroeder, Philip Steer The Lancet Volume 389, Issue 10080, Pages (April 2017) DOI: /S (17) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license Terms and Conditions
2
Figure Trial profile The 46 042 women included in the analysis includes 448 women with two singleton birth episodes and six women with one singleton and one twin birth episode in the study period. The allocation received for the subsequent delivery was independent of the first allocation received. 30 of 21 509† infants in the decision-support group and 37 of 21 599† infants in the no-decision-support group died before 24 months. Parent Report of Children's Abilities—Revised (PARCA-R). *One woman who withdrew (with consent to use of data) was also randomly assigned in error. †Data from the Ireland not included in the numerator (n=1 decision support) or denominator (n=1754 in decision support and n=1752 in no decision support) because data for deaths after discharge were not available; deaths in the flow chart include stillbirths (n=1 in decision support and n=2 in no decision support). The Lancet , DOI: ( /S (17) ) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license Terms and Conditions
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.