Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Mens Rea 1 Lesson Outcomes: Date: Monday, 14 January 2019

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Mens Rea 1 Lesson Outcomes: Date: Monday, 14 January 2019"— Presentation transcript:

1 Mens Rea 1 Lesson Outcomes: Date: Monday, 14 January 2019
Describe the difference between intention and recklessness Apply the law correctly to scenarios Specification links: Mens rea: intention and subjective recklessness; transferred malice; coincidence of actus reus and mens rea. Key vocabulary Mens rea, transferred malice, recklessness, intention Starter: Guess the cases! A B 1

2 Apply your knowledge Complete the Activity box on p.190

3

4 Apply your knowledge Explain the difference between Direct and Oblique intent Complete the Activity box on p.192

5

6 Mens Rea 1 Lesson Outcomes: Date: Monday, 14 January 2019
Describe the difference between intention and recklessness Explain the concept coincidence of AR & MR Know & Understand the cases covered so far. Apply the law correctly to scenarios Specification links: Mens rea: intention and subjective recklessness; transferred malice; coincidence of actus reus and mens rea. Key vocabulary Mens rea, transferred malice, recklessness, intention Starter: In pairs, come up with an action that represents a case. Be ready to test the rest of the class! 6

7

8

9 I.R.A.C Issue – whether AR established. Relevant Law – AR = Act/Omission. GR = cannot be guilty of omission, though some circumstances where duty of care has been found (cases). Act must be voluntary (case). Must be both factual and legal cause of death…Factual = but for (case)…Legal = chain of causation/intervening acts (cases) Apply – Facts state… Conclusion – Therefore, it is submitted that AR has/has not been established… Issue – whether MR established. Relevant Law - MR = Intention or Recklessness. Intention can be direct if purpose or desire to bring about consequences (case) or indirect if alternative purpose or desire but applying the Woollin test, a reasonable person would foresee that the consequences were a virtual certainty and that the defendant also foresaw this virtual certainty. Apply – The facts state… Conclusion – Therefore direct/indirect intention is established/is not established so we must look to recklessness… Issue – whether recklessness established…

10 Apply your knowledge Complete the activity box on p.193

11 Consolidating your knowledge


Download ppt "Mens Rea 1 Lesson Outcomes: Date: Monday, 14 January 2019"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google