1. Possible String Theoretic Deviations from pQCD in Heavy Quark Energy Loss at LHC
William Horowitz
Columbia University
Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS)
June 1, 2007
With many thanks to Miklos Gyulassy,
Simon Wicks, Ivan Vitev, Jorge Casalderrey-Solana.
CERN Heavy Ion Forum

2. pQCD Success at RHIC: (circa 2005) Consistency: RAA(h)~RAA(p)
Y. Akiba for the PHENIX collaboration, hep-ex/
Consistency: RAA(h)~RAA(p)
Null Control: RAA(g)~1
GLV Prediction: Theory~Data for reasonable fixed L~5 fm and dNg/dy~dNp/dy
CERN Heavy Ion Forum

3. Trouble for wQGP Picture
v2 too large
A. Drees, H. Feng, and J. Jia, Phys. Rev. C71: (2005)
(first by E. Shuryak, Phys. Rev. C66: (2002))
D. Teaney, Phys. Rev. C68, (2003)
Hydro h/s too small
wQGP not ruled out, but what if we try…
e- RAA too small
M. Djorjevic, M. Gyulassy, R. Vogt, S. Wicks, Phys. Lett. B632:81-86 (2006)
CERN Heavy Ion Forum

4. Strong Coupling The supergravity double conjecture: QCD  SYM  IIB
IF super Yang-Mills (SYM) is not too different from QCD, &
IF Maldacena conjecture is true
Then a tool exists to calculate strongly-coupled QCD in SUGRA
CERN Heavy Ion Forum

5. Qualitative AdS/CFT Successes:
Mach wave-like structures
sstrong=(3/4) sweak, similar to Lattice
e- RAA ~ p, h RAA; e- RAA(f)
h/sAdS/CFT ~ 1/4p << 1 ~ h/spQCD
J. P. Blaizot, E. Iancu, U. Kraemmer, A. Rebhan, hep-ph/
AdS/CFT
PHENIX, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, (2007)
J. J. Friess, S. S. Gubser, G. Michalogiorgakis, S. S. Pufu, Phys. Rev. D75: (2007)
T. Hirano and M. Gyulassy, Nucl. Phys. A69:71-94 (2006)
CERN Heavy Ion Forum

6. Give up on pQCD? Old and Busted: pQCD New Hotness: AdS/CFT
CERN Heavy Ion Forum

7. If You Ask Me… Use the LHC to Test the Two!
Let’s look at Heavy Quark Jet Suppression
CERN Heavy Ion Forum

8. AdS/CFT vs. pQCD with Jets
Langevin model
Collisional energy loss for heavy quarks
Restricted to low pT
pQCD vs. AdS/CFT computation of D, the diffusion coefficient
ASW model
Radiative energy loss model for all parton species
pQCD vs. AdS/CFT computation of
Debate over its predicted magnitude
ST drag calculation
Equation for infinitely massive quark moving with constant v through infinitely coupled SYM at uniform T
not yet used to calculate observables: let’s do it!
CERN Heavy Ion Forum

9. Looking for a Robust, Detectable Signal
Use large LHC pT reach and identification of c and b to distinguish
RAA ~ (1-e(pT))n(pT), where pf = (1-e)pi (i.e. e = 1-pf/pi)
Asymptotic pQCD momentum loss:
String theory drag momentum loss:
Independent of pT and strongly dependent on Mq!
T2 dependence in exponent makes for a very sensitive probe
Expect: epQCD vs. eAdS indep of pT!!
dRAA(pT)/dpT > 0 => pQCD; dRAA(pT)/dpT < 0 => ST
erad ~ as L2 log(pT/Mq)/pT
eST ~ 1 - Exp(-m L), m = pl1/2 T2/2Mq
S. Gubser, Phys.Rev.D74: (2006)
CERN Heavy Ion Forum

10. Regimes of Applicability
String Regime
Large Nc, constant ‘t Hooft coupling ( )
Small quantum corrections
Large ‘t Hooft coupling
Small string vibration corrections
Only tractable case is both limits at once
Classical supergravity (SUGRA)
RHIC/LHC Regime
Mapping QCD Nc to SYM is easy, but coupling is hard
aS runs whereas aSYM does not: aSYM is something of an unknown constant
Taking aSYM = aS = .3 (D/2pT ~ 1); D/2pT ~ 3 => aSYM ~ .05
CERN Heavy Ion Forum

11. Model Inputs AdS/CFT Drag
“Obvious”: as = aSYM, TSYM = TQCD
D/2pT = 3 inspired: as = .05
pQCD/Hydro inspired: as = .3 (D/2pT ~ 1)
“Alternative”: l = 5.5, TSYM = TQCD/31/4
WHDG convolved radiative and collisional energy loss
as = .3
WHDG radiative energy loss (similar to ASW)
= 40, 100
All use realistic, nonuniform medium with Bjorken expansion
Two medium densities for LHC:
PHOBOS (dNg/dy = 1750); CGC (dNg/dy = 2900)
CERN Heavy Ion Forum

12. LHC c, b RAA pT Dependence
LHC Prediction Zoo: What a Mess!
Let’s go through step by step
Naïve expectations born out in full numerical calculation:
dRAA(pT)/dpT > 0 => pQCD; dRAA(pT)/dpT < 0 => ST
Significant rise in RAA(pT) for pQCD Rad+El
Large suppression leads to flattening
Use of realistic geometry and Bjorken expansion allows saturation below .2
CERN Heavy Ion Forum

13. A Cleaner Signal
But what about the interplay between mass and momentum?
Take ratio of c to b RAA(pT)
pQCD: Mass effects die out with increasing pT
Ratio starts below 1, asymptotically approaches 1. Approach is slower for higher quenching
ST: drag independent of pT, inversely proportional to mass
Ratio starts below 1; independent of pT
RcAA(pT)/RbAA(pT) ~ 1 - as n(pT) L2 log(Mb/Mc) ( /pT)
CERN Heavy Ion Forum

14. LHC RcAA(pT)/RbAA(pT) Prediction
Recall the Zoo:
Taking the ratio cancels most normalization differences seen previously
pQCD ratio asymptotically approaches 1, and more slowly so for increased quenching (until quenching saturates)
AdS/CFT ratio is flat and many times smaller than pQCD at only moderate pT
CERN Heavy Ion Forum

15. But There’s a Catch (I)
Speed limit estimate for applicability of AdS/CFT drag computation
g < gcrit = (1 + 2Mq/l1/2 T)2
~ 4Mq2/(l T2)
Limited by Mcharm ~ 1.2 GeV
Ambiguous T for QGP
smallest gcrit for largest
T = T(t0, x=y=0): (O)
largest gcrit for smallest T = Tc: (|)
CERN Heavy Ion Forum

16. LHC RcAA(pT)/RbAA(pT) Prediction (with speed limits)
O: corrections unlikely for smaller momenta
|: corrections likely for higher momenta
CERN Heavy Ion Forum

17. But There’s a Catch (II)
Limited experimental pT reach?
ALICE Physics Performance Report, Vol. II
CERN Heavy Ion Forum

18. Zoom In Factor ~2-3 increase in ratio for pQCD
Possible distinction for Rad only vs. Rad+El at low-pT
CERN Heavy Ion Forum

19. Conclusions
PID and large pT reach will give the LHC a unique position to make discoveries in the heavy quark sector
Year 1 of LHC could show qualitative differences between energy loss mechanisms:
dRAA(pT)/dpT > 0 => pQCD; dRAA(pT)/dpT < 0 => ST
Ratio of charm to bottom RAA will be an important observable
Ratio is: flat in ST; asymptotically approaching 1 from below in pQCD
While future AdS/CFT calculations could well alter the ST predictions shown here, it is highly unlikely that a pQCD mechanism can be found that allows mass effects to persist out to momenta orders of magnitude larger than Mq
A measurement of this ratio NOT going to 1 will be a clear sign of new physics: pQCD predicts ~ 2-3 times increase in this ratio by 30 GeV—this can be observed in year 1 at the LHC
CERN Heavy Ion Forum

20. Conclusions (cont’d) Additional LHC c, b PID Goodies:
Adil Vitev in-medium fragmentation results in a much more rapid rise to 1 for RcAA/RbAA with the possibility of breaching 1 and asymptotically approaching 1 from above
Surface emission models (although already unlikely as per v2(pT) data) predict flat in pT c, b RAA, with a ratio of 1
Moderately suppressed radiative only energy loss shows a dip in the ratio at low pT; convolved loss is monotonic. Caution: in this regime, approximations are violated
Mach cone may be due to radiated gluons: from pQCD the away-side dip should widen with increasing parton mass
Need for p+A control
CERN Heavy Ion Forum

21. AdS/CFT CERN Heavy Ion Forum
J. P. Blaizot, E. Iancu, U. Kraemmer, A. Rebhan, hep-ph/
AdS/CFT
CERN Heavy Ion Forum

22. Backups
CERN Heavy Ion Forum

23. LHC p Predictions
Our predictions show a significant increase in RAA as a function of pT
This rise is robust over the range of predicted dNg/dy for the LHC that we used
This should be compared to the flat in pT curves of AWS-based energy loss (next slide)
We wish to understand the origin of this difference
WH, S. Wicks, M. Gyulassy, M. Djordjevic, in preparation
CERN Heavy Ion Forum

24. Asymptopia at the LHC Asymptotic pocket formulae:
DErad/E ~ a3 Log(E/m2L)/E
DEel/E ~ a2 Log((E T)1/2/mg)/E
WH, S. Wicks, M. Gyulassy, M. Djordjevic, in preparation
CERN Heavy Ion Forum

25. RHIC e-
CERN Heavy Ion Forum

26. RHIC c, b RAA(pT)
CERN Heavy Ion Forum

27. RHIC RcAA(pT)/RbAA(pT)
CERN Heavy Ion Forum

28. n(pT)
CERN Heavy Ion Forum

29. Langevin Model
Langevin equations (assumes gv ~ 1 to neglect radiative effects):
Relate drag coef. to diffusion coef.:
IIB Calculation:
Use of Langevin requires relaxation time be large compared to the inverse temperature:
AdS/CFT here
CERN Heavy Ion Forum

30. Drag Picture The Heavy Quark Brachistochrone: CERN Heavy Ion Forum
J Friess, S Gubser, G Michalogiorgakis, S Pufu, Phys Rev D75:106003, 2007
CERN Heavy Ion Forum