Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Understanding Multi-Environment Trials

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Understanding Multi-Environment Trials"— Presentation transcript:

1 Understanding Multi-Environment Trials

2 Multi-Environment Trials
Plant Adaptation Regional Environments

3 Definition Genotype: The crop in the field (a community of plant is genetically fairly uniform), represent the “genotype” Environment: A particular combination of soil, climate, pests, and other species (weeds) forming a unique “environment” Attribute: Measurements to characterise the crop, such as “yield”, “grain moisture”, “plot height”

4 Definition Multi-Environment Trial (MET) Plots in the fields

5 Definition Multi-Environment Trial (MET) Data:
i. I genotypes grown in J environments for a single year for a single attribute (G: Genotypes; E: Environments; A: Attributes) I genotypes grown in J environments across years for a single attribute E1 G1 Gi GI Ej EJ E1 G1 Gi GI Ej EJ E1 G1 Gi GI Ej EJ Year 1 Year N

6 Definition Multi-Environment Trial (MET) Data:
I genotypes grown in J environments for a single year for K attributes I genotypes grown in J environments across years for K attributes Note: for some cases, environment is a combination of locations (geographical places) and years, here, we focus on environment only involving the location E1 G1 Gi GI Ej EJ E1 G1 Gi GI Ej EJ A1 AK

7 Definition Multi-Environment Trial (MET)
Multi-environment trial helps breeders combine multiple attributes into a single genotype

8 Purposes Widely use MET data by plant breeders
To evaluate the relative performance of genotypes To help understanding the plant breeding objectives To consider the development of the analytical methodology To recommend and provide suggestions

9 Evaluation of genotypic performance
Crop performance is a function of the genotype of the crop and the nature of the production environment Performance of genotypes may vary in different environments, in different years, in different attributes Reflection the interaction of genotype by environment, or genotype by attribute, or genotype by year, or genotype by environment by year, or genotype by environment by attribute, or genotype by environment by attribute by year Plant adaptation associated with the differences in performance of genotypes and in particular the interactions

10 Understand the Plant breeding
Understanding and prediction of crop response to environments are central in the field of crop physiology and modelling The use of information on plant adaptation in plant breeding Selection for plant adaptation Interaction effects in plant breeding Cases studies on how to accommodate the interaction effects Developing an understanding of the physiological and genetic basis of plant adaptation

11 Interaction Effects Analysis of data from MET shows that interactions are ubiquitous and large compared with genotype main effects Interactions observed as changes in the relative performance of genotypes over environments, over years, over attributes Help to understand quantitative characters in plant breeding Improvement of quantitative characters by selecting among genotypes based on their phenotypic performance

12 Interaction Effects Variation for quantitative characters is under the control of many genes and their contribution can differ among environments Characterization of patterns (Partitions of Interactions) Identify specific differences among patterns Contribution of environments (years, attributes) to specific differences among patterns Identify similarities or dissimilarities of environments (years, attributes)

13 Methods The phenotypic performance of genotypes in MET is commonly investigated in different models which can express phenotypic observations in terms representing the genotypes entered in the trials, the environments, and the interaction Analysis of Variance Stability analysis (e.g. linear regression) Ordination analysis Cluster analysis

14 Methods The analysis of variance
Enables the effects, variances of effects, and variances of differences among effects to be estimated The Stability analysis It is commonly associated with the use of joint linear regression methods, to measure similarity among genotypes Pattern analysis The joint use of cluster analysis of ordination methods

15 Methods Pattern Analysis
Compare multiple genotypes in multiple environments for several attributes Provide essential information for selecting and recommending crop cultivars Exam of the nature of interaction effects Repeatable interactions are target to be determined

16 Research questions of interest
Analysis of multi-environment data The best representative environment The superior genotypes with high and stable performance Note: The high performance is defined for different attributes for different plant

17 The best representative environments
Ideal environments for selecting generally adapted genotypes Ranking environments based on the performance of a genotype Relationships among environments Similarity and dissimilarity between environments

18 The superior genotypes
Performance of the genotypes in specific environments Ranking genotypes based on the performance in one environment Mean performance and stability of the genotypes Ranking genotypes relative to the ideal genotype Comparison among genotypes

19 Next Steps Some demonstrations are provided to show particular analysis applied to multi-environment trials One aspect that is complex is the hierarchical and either crossed or nested aspects of the design Also there is frequently unbalanced elements The use of agronomic treatment to look at the management as G by E by M ( ie Management) is another complex and developing area in research


Download ppt "Understanding Multi-Environment Trials"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google