Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCorey Bruno Strickland Modified over 6 years ago
1
higher education Funding Formulas & performance funding
State of Louisiana Higher Education Governance Commission September 28, 2011
2
Richard L. Petrick Executive Director Ohio Business Alliance for Higher Education and the Economy
3
Overview Principles of formula funding – elements to include
Pitfalls and problems – elements to avoid Performance funding in Ohio – one example Post-budget considerations – monitoring & evaluation is needed Process of decision-making is extremely important
4
Five principles to consider
State decides what to value, and measures and rewards processes & outcomes related to those goals. Intentional Resources will be reallocated based on campus performance. Dynamic Campuses should know upper and lower bounds of short-term outcomes, and how their performance will affect the outcome. Predictable Math that drives the formula may be complex, but concepts should not be. Simple One size does not fit all. Mission Sensitive
5
Pitfalls and problems to avoid
Thresholds create cliffs; continuous metrics don’t. Thresholds “Hold harmless” and guaranteed increases create artificial protection, and are difficult to eliminate. Guarantees Integrate all metrics into a single formula; bolt-ons tend to disappear in tough times. “Bolt-ons” New policies need time to take effect; frequent major policy changes kill the will -- and ability -- to respond to any state initiative. Frequent changes Often viewed positively to help a campus through a rough patch; but supplements – like zombies – almost never die. Supplemental core funding
6
FY 2010 - 2011 performance formulas in Ohio
Course and degree completions, weighted by cost, with premium for at-risk students + dynamic setasides University main campuses Course completions only, weighted by cost, with at-risk premium Regional campuses “Success Points” + enrollments Community colleges
7
Five principles, applied to Ohio
Student success goals specified in the state’s 10-year Strategic Plan. Therefore, shift from enrollment-based formula to outcomes-based formula. Intentional Reallocation of funds has occurred, but effect of formula is phased in over time.. Dynamic A ‘stop-loss’ provides a floor for loss of state funds. Predictable Math is extremely complex; but everyone understands the idea of funding student success outcomes and not inputs. Simple Ohio has three separate formulas; also provides premium for success of at-risk students. Mission Sensitive
8
Post-budget evaluations and assessments
Design Advocacy Implemen-tation Evaluation Revision
9
Post-budget evaluations and assessments
Design Advocacy Implemen-tation Evaluation Revision Program review Outcome evaluation
10
Policy-making process
Problems down Solutions up
11
Thank you
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.