Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byYuliani Halim Modified over 6 years ago
1
Higgs Vector Boson Fusion Production and Detection at the Tevatron
Rick St. Denis – Glasgow University
2
Outline Vector Boson Fusion Production of Higgs
Production cross sections and comparisons to current Tevatron favorite channels Event characteristics at MH=130, 160, GeV/c2 Comparison to LHC
3
VBF Production Features
q q' W+ W- H0 e- m+ ne nm Missing Et High Pt Leptons 2 forward jets, opposite in rapidity, high mass Spin 0 Higgs correlates spins of leptons: e,m parallel and neutrinos also Dhe-jet about 1-1.5
4
Kraemer vs Pythia
5
Production:Check Pythia, Kraemer, Spira
Below 1
6
ZH corrections
7
Interesting Diversion: pp vs ppbar
ZH WH VBF gg
8
VBF 25% Better in PbarP u d W+ d ppbar: u,d u W- d u W+ pp: u d d u W-
Hence: U U D U U D Ratio is 5/4 = 1.25 5 chances 4 chances
9
Check of Higgs Branching Ratios
WW ZZ
10
Check of Higgs BR: Pythia/Spira
20-25% differences
11
Apply NLO to Pythia WH(lnbb) Used WW correction For VBF Total ZH(nnbb)
ZH(llbb) gg-WW WH-WWW VBF
12
For 8fb-1
13
Study Characteristics at 130, 160, 200
^ q q' W+ W- H0 e- m+ ne nm
14
Pt, Rapidity of Leptons, Jets
Tev, MH=160 Pt, Rapidity of Leptons, Jets Pt Quark can be low Reasonably Triggerable Electron In CDF Quark Forward
15
Rapidity of two quarks Tev, MH=160 Max h of 2 quarks Min h of 2 quarks
Dh of 2 quarks
16
Missing Energy Tev, MH=160 60 GeV Met Met vs Pte Met 180o from e
Quark can be along Met
17
Lepton Correlations:e-ne
Tev, MH=160 Lepton Correlations:e-ne Df (e,ne) e,neanticorrelated in f
18
Lepton Correlations: e-m
Tev, MH=160 Lepton Correlations: e-m e,m correlated in y,phi and have high pt DR
19
Masses Tev, MH=160 Mt for e m n Large Invariant Mass between leptons
High Invariant Mass between quarks
20
Electron-Jet Separation
Tev, MH=160 Electron-Jet Separation
21
Mh=130 GeV/c2, Tevatron
22
Pt, Rapidity of Leptons, Jets
Tev, MH=130 Pt Quark can be low Less Triggerable Electron In CDF Quark Forward, like 160
23
Rapidity of two quarks Tev, MH=130 Max h of 2 quarks Min h of 2 quarks
Dh of 2 quarks
24
Missing Energy Tev, MH=130 Less Missing Et, slightly lower pt leptons
Met , q less correlated Met , e less correlated
25
Lepton Correlations:e-ne
Tev, MH=130 Lepton Correlations:e-ne Df (e,ne) e,ne less anticorrelated in f
26
Tev, MH=130 Lepton Correlations e,m not as correlated DR
27
Masses Tev, MH=130 Mt for e m n Slightly less Invariant Mass between
leptons Less Invariant Mass between quarks
28
Electron-Jet Separation
Tev, MH=130 Electron-Jet Separation Same Separation
29
Mh=200 GeV/c2, Tevatron
30
Pt, Rapidity of Leptons, Jets
Tev, MH=200 Pt, Rapidity of Leptons, Jets Pt Quark can be low More Triggerable Quark still Forward, not much change Electron In CDF
31
Rapidity of two quarks Tev, MH=200 Max h of 2 quarks Min h of 2 quarks
Not Much Change Dh of 2 quarks
32
Missing Energy Tev, MH=200 Higher Missing Et, Higher pt leptons
Met , e stronger corr. Met , q same
33
Tev, MH=200 Lepton Correlations e,m much less correlated
34
Lepton Correlations:e-ne
Tev, MH=200 Lepton Correlations:e-ne Df (e,ne) e,ne more anticorrelated, in f but not at 180o
35
Masses Larger Invariant Mass between leptons Tev, MH=200 Mt for e m n
quarks
36
Electron-Jet Separation
Tev, MH=200 Electron-Jet Separation Same l-j separation
37
Mh=160 GeV/c2, LHC
38
Pt, Rapidity of Leptons, Jets
LHC, MH=160 Pt, Rapidity of Leptons, Jets Pt Quark can be low Reasonably Triggerable Electron In CDF: wider distn At LHC Quark more Forward
39
Rapidity of two quarks LHC, MH=160 Max h of 2 Quarks Min h wider –
Dh of 2 Quarks wider
40
LHC, MH=160 Missing Energy A bit larger at LHC
41
Lepton Correlations:e-ne
LHC, MH=160 Lepton Correlations:e-ne Df (e,ne) e,ne anticorrelated less sharply in f
42
LHC, MH=160 Lepton Correlations e,m better correlated
43
Masses LHC, MH=160 Mt for e m n Larger Invariant Mass between leptons
Higher Invariant Mass between quarks
44
Electron-Jet Separation
LHC, MH=160 Electron-Jet Separation Same l-j separation
45
Conclusions Cross sections and widths disagree at 20% level
NLO variation with scale can be large Yield of VBF about 10% of gg->WW can enhance after cuts MET, Et and rapidity coverage for CDF electrons fine, muons may need tricks using e m signal correlation Large missing Energy, Lepton correlations due to spin, Invariant mass of tagging jets good handles.
46
Conclusions (cont) Best at 160, suffers some e-mu decorrelation and lower pt for lower masses, emu decorrelation but higher pt at higher mass. Detection in this mode relies on spin of Higgs: if you find it, how much have you also measured that it is spin 0?
47
Next Steps Check Cross section for VBF properly
Check correlations in MET, e, m, jet for help in mass reco/ efficiency Study backgrounds for same distributions Develop estimators: avoid hard cuts in order to conserve events Move on to real simluations Study W to jet possibility, Higgs to t
48
Spare Slides
49
Kinematics ^ : The local CM - pay for this with PDF s
MW Can keep small with W off shell MH Can also reduce with H off shell Can emit ISR to give pt to H, but costs PDF s ^ q q' W+ W- H0 e- m+ ne nm s ^ s ^
50
Vector Boson fusion Production
q q' W+ W- H0 e- m+ ne nm
51
Missing Et Correlations
Tev, MH=160 Missing Et Correlations
52
Tev, MH=160 Neutrinos
53
Tev, MH=160 Neutrinos
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.