Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byKaarina Lahti Modified over 6 years ago
1
ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics
Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
2
Lecture 15, 17 Oct 13 In Chapters 02 and 03 in Datta:
How to correctly measure I = GV Add scattering to Landauer-Buttiker Buttiker approach for dealing with incoherent scatterers 2.6 occupied states as scatterers 3.1 scattering/S matrix VM Ayres, ECE , F13
3
1 Deg, M = 1 mR mL X O X probe m m VM Ayres, ECE , F13
4
Outline of the solution:
Goal: V = IR, solve for R What is V: mA – mB What is I: I = I1 = I2 VM Ayres, ECE , F13
5
VM Ayres, ECE , F13
6
Lec 14: where Ielectron VM Ayres, ECE , F13
7
Lec 14: Further benefit: from I3 + I4 = 0 with Unitarity and symmetry, found m:
VM Ayres, ECE , F13
8
Lec 14: Used 3 conditions: 1/ I3 + I4 = 0 2/ 3/
VM Ayres, ECE , F13
9
Datta Sec. 2.6 VM Ayres, ECE , F13
10
1 Deg, M = 1 mR mL X O X probe m mA mB m VM Ayres, ECE , F13
11
VM Ayres, ECE , F13
12
NT(E) VM Ayres, ECE , F13
13
Where from: VM Ayres, ECE , F13
14
Where from: VM Ayres, ECE , F13
15
Where from: VM Ayres, ECE , F13
16
VM Ayres, ECE , F13
17
VM Ayres, ECE , F13
18
VM Ayres, ECE , F13
19
VM Ayres, ECE , F13
20
VM Ayres, ECE , F13
21
above mB VM Ayres, ECE , F13
22
VM Ayres, ECE , F13
23
VM Ayres, ECE , F13
24
VM Ayres, ECE , F13
25
VM Ayres, ECE , F13
26
VM Ayres, ECE , F13
27
VM Ayres, ECE , F13
28
VM Ayres, ECE , F13
29
VM Ayres, ECE , F13
30
VM Ayres, ECE , F13
31
VM Ayres, ECE , F13
32
Datta Sec. 3.1 VM Ayres, ECE , F13
33
What is a scattering S matrix?:
VM Ayres, ECE , F13
34
Introduce an S-matrix to describe both probe and occupied state scattering while maintaining Landuaer-Buttiker approach of treating all terminals alike: VM Ayres, ECE , F13
35
VM Ayres, ECE , F13
36
Datta, Sec. 3.1: Two propagating modes into one propagating mode: expect scattering due to occupied states Game plan: for each Si j element: determine: is it a reflection or a transmission? VM Ayres, ECE , F13
37
Start with a more familiar example from a paper by Engquist:
The single in/out channel for the incoherent scatterer gives an experimentally wrong resistance. The Buttiker two-channel probe description turned out to be correct. VM Ayres, ECE , F13
38
Example: find the S-matrix for the diagram shown.
VM Ayres, ECE , F13
39
Example: find the S-matrix for the diagram shown.
VM Ayres, ECE , F13
40
Example: find the S-matrix for the diagram shown.
VM Ayres, ECE , F13
41
Example: find the scattering matrix S for the Engquist diagram:
VM Ayres, ECE , F13
42
Example: find the scattering matrix S for the Engquist diagram:
aout bin gin VM Ayres, ECE , F13
43
VM Ayres, ECE , F13
44
VM Ayres, ECE , F13
45
VM Ayres, ECE , F13
46
Datta Sec. 3.1 VM Ayres, ECE , F13
47
Example: find the S-matrix for the diagram shown.
VM Ayres, ECE , F13
48
VM Ayres, ECE , F13
49
VM Ayres, ECE , F13
50
VM Ayres, ECE , F13
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.