1. Analytics on Courts, Judges, and Firms
Centre on the Legal Profession, Deakin Law School
Melbourne, Australia
Kerry Kassam
Product Counsel | Ravel Law

2. MOTION OUTCOMES
Original dashboard

3. MOTION OUTCOMES (FILTER APPLIED)
Dashboard with ”Patents” filter applied

4. TOPIC FILTERS
Dashboard with ”Patents” filter applied

5. CITED CASES (FILTER APPLIED)
Cited Decisions: “Patents” selected and “prior art” filter applied

6. Heavily Cited Cases
Cited Decisions: “Patents” selected and “prior art” filter applied

7. MOTION OUTCOMES BY FIRM
Prototype: Outcomes overview (sample data)

8. Top 10: National overview of motions – Outcome & Volume
Aggregates all district courts. 37% Spread

9. Motions to Dismiss: by Circuit
13% spread

10. Motions to Dismiss: by District (Descending by volume)

11. Motions to Dismiss: by District (Descending grant rate)
30% spread

12. Motions to Dismiss: 9th Circuit
12% spread

13. Motions to Dismiss: Northern District of California
30% spread. Currently serving judges.

14. Judicial Self-Citations || PostgreSQL query on Redshift

15. Judicial Impact || PostgreSQL query on Redshift

16. Thank You Kerry Kassam Product Counsel | Ravel Law
Phone:
GitHub: 1337H4x0rz