1. QoG’s proposal for reorganizing dissemination
Our suggestion is to divide the budget by pillars. The proposal aims at allowing for heterogeneity in the way findings are disseminated and granting greater independence to the pillars, thereby avoiding transaction costs.

2. We suggest
That we transfer the coordination of WP12 to QoG, if TI is not willing to retain this role.
That we transfer the webpage/ online work to Hertie ( WP leaders and the main contact persons at each institution remain responsible for furnishing this person with material)
That we divide the dissemination budget by pillars, taking into account both the number of WPs and the varying level of commitment to dissemination activities.
Please note that WP leaders will retain the main responsibility for disseminating the findings, including national level events.
To further clarify the division of responsibilities and the role of WP leaders, a work description for WP leaders should be written
That we commit to interfere as little as possible in each others work, and allow for heterogeneity in dissemination strategies and activities

3. Dissemination QOG’s Proposal
Our proposal for dividing the budget is the following
To allocate approximately 200 000 euros to Hertie for webpage etc
To allocate approximately 140 000 euros to  Hertie for the dissemination of WP 3, 8 and 10, (i.e including national events, audio visual material etc.)
To allocate approximately 60 000 euros to QoG for organizing national event for WP 1, 5 and 11, for one European event, for the dissemination of  D12.7 involving all pillars etc.
To allocate approximately 25 000 euros for dissemination activities of WP4 and 6 (UCL)
To allocate approximately 20 000 euros to WP 9 for D9.2 ( EUI)
Approximately 100 000 euros is suggested to be reserved as a buffer for unanticipated events and expenses 3

4. Dissemination activities (draft)4

5. 5

6. Draft budget 6

7. BCE CSD PSD SAR SKAMBA UNIBG UNIPG QOG ELIAMEP HAT
Dissemination proposals from partners so far
See attachments:
BCE CSD PSD SAR SKAMBA UNIBG UNIPG QOG ELIAMEP HAT 7

8. Pillar structure Pillar 1 EUI: WP2 and WP 9
Pillar 2 QOG: WP 1 WP 5, WP 7 and WP 11
Pillar 3 UCL: WP 4 and WP 6
Pillar 4 HERTIE: WP 3, WP 8 and WP 10 8

9. AC TASKS AND FUNCTIONS TABLE9

10. Contract amendments Personal changes
- The replacement of Bo Rothstein (QoG), scientific coordinator and member of steering committee, by Monika Bauhr, QOG. - The replacement of Ms. Vita Terauda as director of PROVIDUS, by Ms. Dace Akule partner team PROVIDUS - The replacement of Kristina Orbán Meunier financial officer QOG, by Malin Ceder QOG. Review list of people 10

11. Contract amendments, Work packages/ Deliverable changes
- A reallocation of work between partners was required in WP3 due to a change in the panel of countries UNOTT will shift its PMs from WP3 to Wp11 (?).PSD will shift two of its PMs from WP8 to WP QoG to move 2 PMs from WP3 to WP2? HERTIE moves 2 PMS from WP 1 to WP HAT to leave WP2 altogether, transferring remaining 6PMs from there to WP4 & WP8 (dividing it as 2 for WP4, 4 for WP8);
- Add deliverable on ACRN feed
- New actual starting dates for WPs 5 & 8
- Review deliverable dates (D.8.1; D12.4?) 11

12. Organizational and financial changes-
- Add sum for minor subcontracting
Work descriptions for the Scientific coordinator and pillar leader are under review by the Steering committee and they may result in some minor changes in the Grant agreement.
- Pillar structure change
Pillar structure change – Policy pillar to include WP3, WP8 and WP10 with WP6 joining Impact pillar
Contract amendments
Organizational and financial changes 12

13. Dissemination changes
Contract amendments
Dissemination changes
- There are plans to decentralise the dissemination activities, which may lead to some reallocation from TI’s budget.   -WP 12 change: TI is transferring its leadership for Work package 12 and the proposal is that QOG will replace TI. 13

14. Task and function table ( draft)14