Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMarcia Chandler Modified over 5 years ago
1
IVIG guideline update Signal Detection Analysis
Alan Tinmouth April 25, 2016
2
Ottawa EPC Project Team: Nadhera Ahmadza
Objective To assess the currency of the following two clinical practice guideline recommendations using the Ottawa EPC’s method for qualitative signal detection approach: Guideline on the use of Intravenous Immune Globulin (IVIG) for the following 22 Neurologic conditions. Guideline on the use of Intravenous Immune Globulin (IVIG) for the following 18 Hematologic conditions. Ottawa EPC Project Team: Nadhera Ahmadza Roxanne Ward Becky Skidmore Chantelle Garritty Brian Hutton
3
Signal detection process
4
Signal detection process
5
IVIG Signal Detection Progress to date
Phase I: Locating disease specific recommendations (for or against) in the original guideline (IVIG use for hematologic 18 conditions; IVIG use for neurologic 22 conditions). Completed (Expert opinion matrices) Developing a matrix to be sent to experts that will list the guideline recommendations. Contacting experts and seeking their opinion on whether new evidence suggests any of the followings for the intervention(s) of interest in the population stated in the specific recommendation Completed (Expert opinion matrices) ☐ Additional experts contacted for HDN, FNAIT, Epilepsy, ADEP
6
IVIG Signal Detection Progress to date
Phase I – Review of expert opinions, and targeted search by disease CIDP Expert Review 2/6 – guideline’s recommendations no longer valid 4/6 – aware of new evidence invalidating recommendations Evidence Review Evidence of long term therapy maintenance with IVIG up to 48 weeks Improved outcomes compared with methylprednisilone Conclusion Signal detected.
7
IVIG Signal Detection Progress to date
Phase I – Review of expert opinions and targeted search by disease Multifocal Motor Neuropathy Expert Review 1/5 – guideline’s recommendations no longer valid 3/5 – aware of new evidence invalidating recommendations Evidence Review Cross-over study and observational transition showing equal effectiveness of IVIG and SCIG RCT demonstrating improved outcomes with IVIG vs. placebo Observational study reported improved outcomes with higher dose in non-responsive patients Conclusion Signal identified
8
IVIG Signal Detection Progress to date
Phase I – Review of expert opinions and targeted search by disease Polymyositis Expert Review 3/6 – did not know if guideline’s recommendations still valid 1/6 – aware of new evidence invalidating recommendations Evidence Review 2 studies of IVIG in dematomyositis and polymyositis did not differentiate between conditions. One RCT showed no difference compared to placebo One observational study showed improvement post IVIG Conclusion No signal identified.
9
IVIG Signal Detection Progress to date
Phase I – Review of expert opinions and targeted search by disease Dermatomyositis Expert Review 1/6 – guideline’s recommendations no longer valid 2/6 – aware of new evidence invalidating recommendations Evidence Review 2 studies of IVIG in dematomyosiitis and polymyositis did not differentiate between conditions. One RCT showed no difference compared to placebo One observational study showed improvement post IVIG Conclusion No signal identified.
10
IVIG Signal Detection Progress to date
Phase I – Review of expert opinions and targeted search by disease Diabetic neuropathy Expert Review 2/6 – did not know if guideline recommendations still valid 1/6 – aware of new evidence invalidating recommendations Evidence Review No evaluable studies One suggested study had no comparator Conclusion No signal identified.
11
IVIG Signal Detection Progress to date
Phase II – Provisional literature search Conducting an updated electronic search Single search for all neurologic and hematologic conditions Top 7 medical journals Top 166 specialty journals 68 hematology journals and 98 neurology journals 5064 records after de-duplication Screening the retrieved records Currently underway
12
IVIG Signal Detection Work to come
Phase I - Review of expert opinions and targeted searches Review of expert opinions completed (except 4 conditions) For most conditions, previous guidelines still applied or experts did not know if guidelines still valid Targeted searches ongoing Final reports on 2 to 4 conditions per month Completion Fall 2016 Phase II – Provisional literature search Review of records starting
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.