1. ENVIRONET breakout session
Group 3 (ID, PT, USA, AU, BE, JP, NL)

2. Q1- ENVIRONET SERVICES A) GLOSSARY FOR ER:
CONSISTENCY IN TERMINOLOGY
CHECK AND STANDARDIZE TERMINOLOGY AND ADDRESS GAPS
PRINTABLE; WEB
DIFFERENT VERSIONS (?), e.g. DEPENDING ON TARGET GROUP
CHALLENGES: POLICY IMPLICATIONS OF TERMINOLOGY
COMPILE DOCUMENTS ADDRESSING ER – A RESOURCE REFERENCE LIBRARY
A REVIEW OF ER ISSUES IN OTHER COUNTRIES, INCLUDING ACADEMIC PROGRAMMES ON ER RESEARCH (NEEDS)
B) BESIDES ENVIRONET MEETINGS
TRAINING COURSES
WEB SEMINARS – USEFUL BUT MAY NOT REACH EVERYONE DUE TO LANGUAGE DIFFICULTIES (e.g. JP, ID);
REGIONAL OR GROUP MEETINGS OR FOCUSED SESSIONS ACCORDING TO SPECIFIC ISSUES OR COMMON INTERESTS THAT ARE ALREADY IDENTIFIED (FUNDING, STAKEHOLDERS, ???)- VIDEO CONFERENCE WEB MEETINGS;
MEMBERS ARE WILLING TO CONTRIBUTE

3. Q2 - STAKEHOLDERS STAKEHOLDERS: AS ENVIRONET MEMBERS
DECISION-MAKERS (REGULATORY BODIES, MIN. ENVIRONMENT,…)
INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRY ORGANISATIONS ? (e.g. WNA, ICCN)
INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS (e.g. ICRP, Asian)
STAKEHOLDERS: AS PARTICIPANTS AT SOME TM’S:
INDUSTRY
PUBLICS -> MAYORS, COMMUNITY GROUPS, NGO’s
RESPONSIBLES / HAVING AN OVERVIEW/ROLE RELATED TO FUNDING OF ER
MECHANISMS
PRESENTATIONS AT TECHNICAL MEETINGS: INVITATION + PROVISION OF FUNDING
DISCUSSIONS AT TARGET MEETINGS (E.G. WITH INDUSTRY TO UNDERSTAND THEIR CONCERNS, PROBLEMS)

4. Q3 – CHALLENGES RELATED TO END STATES
CLEAR END POINTS AND CLOSURE OBJECTIVES
CRITERIA TO REACH THE OBJECTIVES
INDICATORS/ WAYS TO MEASURE/EVALUATE CRITERIA
AGREED BY ALL STAKEHOLDERS
CHALLENGES
STANDARDS (e.g. INTEGRATION OF VARIOUS STANDARDS –SUCH AS ISO- IN ER)
COMMUNICATION
EDUCATION (ALL STAKEHOLDERS, INCLUDING REGULATORS)
SUSTAINABILITY OF REMEDIATION GOALS IN THE LONG TERM  POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR LONG TERM SURVEILLANCE, MONITORING AND INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL, INCLUDING FUNDING
DEALING WITH SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS, e.g. COMPENSATIONS POST-ACCIDENT vs. ER

5. Q4 ER NATIONAL POLICY CHALLENGES VARIOUS GAPS IMPACT
FRAGMENTATION OF JURISDICTION (NATIONAL POLICY, BUT REGIONAL/STATE APPLICATION OF IT) OR RESPONSIBILITIES (eg CHEMICAL vs RADIOLOGICAL)
FUNDING OF ER MAY VARY FROM INDUSTRY TO INDUSTRY
ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES
SPLIT OF RESPONSIBILITIES BETWEEN NORM / TENORM
VARIOUS GAPS
IN SOME COUNTRIES NO NATIONAL POLICY FOR NORM
NO POLICY FOR ER IN SOME COUNTRIES
NO ER POST-ACCIDENT
IMPACT
RESPONSE PLANS MAY NOT DEAL WITH LONG TERM IMPACTS
EVACUATION / RETURN CRITERIA HAVE AN IMPACT ON ER PROCESSES

6. Q5 SPECIAL TOPICS FUNDING MECHANISMS STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
RISK ASSESSMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES AND IMPACT ON AND OF FUNDING IN THE LONG TERM
IMPROVEMENT/DISSEMINATION OF INDUSTRIAL LEADING PRACTICES INCORPORATING PROGRESSIVE ER
OPTIMISING INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES TO MINIMIZE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND REDUCING THE EVENTUAL FINAL REMEDIATION COSTS