Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byFanny van der Wolf Modified over 6 years ago
1
Sponsorship on Standardisation Draft recommendations
Barteld Braaksma, Wim Kloek, Katalin Szép Forwardlooking Feedback Workshop, The Hague, 30/31 May 2013
2
Where did the recommendations come from?
12 ‘strategic’ recommendations 14 ‘operational’ recommendations Sponsorship discussions Input from pillars Stocktaking and Framework Lessons learned from Census Hub evaluation 2
3
Lay-out of recommendations
Heading Formulation Motivation Consequences Next steps 3
4
4 Example 3.2 Vocabulary for standardisation concepts
Formulation. Build a vocabulary explaining the key standardisation-related concepts. Motivation. Such a vocabulary is essential in order to develop and promote a common language. Consequences. When set up, availability of this vocabulary needs to be communicated and somebody should be made responsible for maintaining it. Next steps. Set up the vocabulary and develop a plan for communicating, promoting and maintaining it. 4
5
5 Overall process Preparation of draft recommendations (April)
Discussion in FLFB workshop (May) Compliance check with EU legislative architecture (June) Amended set of draft recommendations (July) Submission of draft to ESSC (August) ESSC Discussion/adoption (September) Implementation (from October onwards) 5
6
Goal of Today’s session
Recommendations clear? Opinions on recommendations Discussion on consequences For ESS in general For individual institutes Suggestions for improvement Suggestions for implementation [Add/drop recommendations] 6
7
7 Setting 10:30-11:00 Discussion in six groups
Initial reactions on selected recommendations 11:00-11:30 Presentations of findings Five minutes per group (by group chairs) 11:30-12:00 Open space Additional reactions from combined participants Red and green stickers, question marks, comments 13:00-14:30 Panel discussion Interactive session, issues identified by group chairs (lunchtime) 7
8
Draft Recommendations:
Group 1 Draft Recommendations: 2.1, 2.2, 3.1, 3.2 Ms Barbara Augustowska Ms Dace Deinate Mr Wim Kloek (chair) Mr Erik Meurisse Mr Bogdan Oancea 8
9
Draft Recommendations:
Group 2 Draft Recommendations: 2.3, 2.4, 3.3, 3.4 Mr Csaba Ábry Mr John Dunne Mr Petr Eliáš Mr Jean-Pierre Grandjean (chair) Ms Marta Mravcová Mr Steven Vale 9
10
Draft Recommendations:
Group 3 Draft Recommendations: 2.5, 2.6, 3.5, 3.8, 3.11, 3.12 Mr Faiz Alsuhail (chair) Mr Emanuele Baldacci Mr Peter Struijs Ms Katalin Szép Mr Andis Rožkalns 10
11
Draft Recommendations:
Group 4 Draft Recommendations: 2.7, 2.10, 3.6, 3.7, 3.9 Mr Barteld Braaksma Mr Rune Gløersen Mr Alistair Hamilton Mr Werner Holzer Ms Nadia Mignolli (chair) Mr Ignas Miskinis 11
12
Draft Recommendations:
Group 5 Draft Recommendations: 2.9, 2.10, 3.15, 3.16 Mr Daniel Defays Ms Nadezda Fursova Mr Ioannis Nikolaidis Mr Jean-Pierre Renfer (chair) Mr Peter Schmidt Mr Torben Søborg 12
13
Draft Recommendations:
Group 6 Draft Recommendations: 2.8, 2.11, 2.12, 3.10, 3.13, 3.14 Ms Deirdre Giesen Ms Stefania Macchia Ms Tatjana Novak Mr Ingo Planz (chair) Ms Ana Isabel Sánchez 13
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.