1. Sponsorship on Standardisation Draft recommendations
Barteld Braaksma, Wim Kloek, Katalin Szép
Forwardlooking Feedback Workshop, The Hague, 30/31 May 2013

2. Where did the recommendations come from?
12 ‘strategic’ recommendations
14 ‘operational’ recommendations
Sponsorship discussions
Input from pillars Stocktaking and Framework
Lessons learned from Census Hub evaluation 2

3. Lay-out of recommendations
Heading
Formulation
Motivation
Consequences
Next steps 3

4. 4 Example 3.2 Vocabulary for standardisation concepts
Formulation. Build a vocabulary explaining the key standardisation-related concepts.
Motivation. Such a vocabulary is essential in order to develop and promote a common language.
Consequences. When set up, availability of this vocabulary needs to be communicated and somebody should be made responsible for maintaining it.
Next steps. Set up the vocabulary and develop a plan for communicating, promoting and maintaining it. 4

5. 5 Overall process Preparation of draft recommendations (April)
Discussion in FLFB workshop (May)
Compliance check with EU legislative architecture (June)
Amended set of draft recommendations (July)
Submission of draft to ESSC (August)
ESSC Discussion/adoption (September)
Implementation (from October onwards) 5

6. Goal of Today’s session
Recommendations clear?
Opinions on recommendations
Discussion on consequences
For ESS in general
For individual institutes
Suggestions for improvement
Suggestions for implementation
[Add/drop recommendations] 6

7. 7 Setting 10:30-11:00 Discussion in six groups
Initial reactions on selected recommendations
11:00-11:30 Presentations of findings
Five minutes per group (by group chairs)
11:30-12:00 Open space
Additional reactions from combined participants
Red and green stickers, question marks, comments
13:00-14:30 Panel discussion
Interactive session, issues identified by group chairs (lunchtime) 7

8. Draft Recommendations:
Group 1
Draft Recommendations:
2.1, 2.2, 3.1, 3.2
Ms Barbara Augustowska
Ms Dace Deinate
Mr Wim Kloek (chair)
Mr Erik Meurisse
Mr Bogdan Oancea 8

9. Draft Recommendations:
Group 2
Draft Recommendations:
2.3, 2.4, 3.3, 3.4
Mr Csaba Ábry
Mr John Dunne
Mr Petr Eliáš
Mr Jean-Pierre Grandjean (chair)
Ms Marta Mravcová
Mr Steven Vale 9

10. Draft Recommendations:
Group 3
Draft Recommendations:
2.5, 2.6, 3.5, 3.8, 3.11, 3.12
Mr Faiz Alsuhail (chair)
Mr Emanuele Baldacci
Mr Peter Struijs
Ms Katalin Szép
Mr Andis Rožkalns 10

11. Draft Recommendations:
Group 4
Draft Recommendations:
2.7, 2.10, 3.6, 3.7, 3.9
Mr Barteld Braaksma
Mr Rune Gløersen
Mr Alistair Hamilton
Mr Werner Holzer
Ms Nadia Mignolli (chair)
Mr Ignas Miskinis 11

12. Draft Recommendations:
Group 5
Draft Recommendations:
2.9, 2.10, 3.15, 3.16
Mr Daniel Defays
Ms Nadezda Fursova
Mr Ioannis Nikolaidis
Mr Jean-Pierre Renfer (chair)
Mr Peter Schmidt
Mr Torben Søborg 12

13. Draft Recommendations:
Group 6
Draft Recommendations:
2.8, 2.11, 2.12, 3.10, 3.13, 3.14
Ms Deirdre Giesen
Ms Stefania Macchia
Ms Tatjana Novak
Mr Ingo Planz (chair)
Ms Ana Isabel Sánchez 13