1. GEC Assessment Subcommittee
Visualization From Dr. Tim Brophy and Rajeeb Das d1

2. Discussion of Subcommittee
Usefulness to GEC
Standard errors
Aggregation
Map of assessments to outcomes
“Highest Score” to “Decaying Average” (needs approval from GEC)
More information needed by GEC?
Usefulness of data for faculty
Helpful to examine
Need to consider additional information for modifications
Potential brief paper on modifications and data

3. Discussion of Subcommittee
What subjects are addressed – Should be increased to include all 7 areas of GEC
Quality of assessments – Potential brief paper on psychometrics
What data should be collected (level of aggregation)
How many levels of scores – currently Master or Not Master
Breadth of subject area outcomes?