1. Streamlining of Reporting on Industral Emissions
Ian:

2. Extension of INSPIRE PF requirements The final Reporting workflows
Overview
Background
Project Overview
Extension of INSPIRE PF requirements
The final Reporting workflows
Next Steps
Questions?
Ian:

3. Background
Ian:

4. Greenhouse gas inventory
Background: Why initiate this process?
Many datasets on the various facets of environment pressures from industry
Inventory on Large
Combustion Plants
Annual EU
Greenhouse gas inventory
Ian:

5. Background: Main Drivers
Why the integration of reporting?
European Commission decision in 2014
E-PRTR and LCP fit well together – good starting point
Immediate QA/QC cross-checks can improve data quality
Reduce the cost of data management and review, both for data providers and the EEA
Address key problems:
Different identifiers assigned for different reporting requirements
Different rules on handling changes over time (splits, mergers, etc.)
Duplications and inconsistencies
Reduce reporting burden
Ian:

6. Background: Key objectives
To simplify and clarify industrial emissions reporting, reducing the administrative burden where possible
Provide a robust reporting structure for the EU Registry on Industrial Sites and for thematic (emissions) information
Establish integrated reporting channel for E-PRTR and LCP emissions data
Develop a coherent view of reporting facilities
Generate consistent & reliable EU thematic datasets
Comply with INSPIRE requirements
Ian:

7. Project Overview
Ian:

8. Project overview
Harry: Harry to discuss the overview diagram, highlighting the intention of the EEA to create public data products.

9. EU Registry geographical hierarchy:
Site 1
Site INSPIRE ID
Facility 1
Facility INSPIRE ID
Facility 2
Facility INSPIRE ID
:E-PRTR+LCP INSPIRE connectivity
Installation 1
Installation INSPIRE ID
Facility INSPIRE ID
E-PRTR thematic data reported at this level
Installation Part 1
Installation Part INSPIRE ID
Harry: to mention Geographical hierarchy, and INSPIRE connectivity
LCP thematic data reported at this level
Installation Part INSPIRE ID

10. Extension of INSPIRE PF Requirements
Ian:

11. Correlation: EU Registry INSPIRE E-PRTR IED
ProductionSite
Correlation
No definition provided
ProductionFacility
ProductionInstallation
ProductionInstallationPart
Harry: Harry to highlight the cross analysis of entity definitions within the fundamental legal instruments. Harry to mention the good alignment with the INSPIRE PF, and the benefit that this structure is INSPIRE compliant.

12. Production Facilities (PF) and INSPIRE:
PF Data Specification
Harry: Harry to discuss how the fundamental PF structure is not solely fit for purpose despite good alignment.

13. Extending the INSPIRE data model:
Data modelling exercise:
Removed unnecessary feature types
Added extensions to include fields specific to the reporting legislation
INSPIRE PF UML overview with feature types simplified
Harry: Harry to discuss the INSPIRE extensions

14. Production Installation extension
Populating Extensions
Each extension requires new fields to be defined
Certain fields were derived to collect key information defined in the 2006 E-PRTR Regulation and the 2010 Industrial Emissions Directive
In addition, by considering information critical to the data flow and the QA/QC of data, other fields were defined.
Constraints are added to make certain attributes mandatory
Detailed view
Simplified view
Production Installation extension

15. EU Registry: Final streamlined view
Harry: Harry to discuss streamlined view, the fundamental view of the EU Registry which clearly displays the geographical hierarchy.

16. Compliant GML generated by MS
The workflow: XML or Access
Route 1
Member state internal systems
Compliant GML generated by MS
Uploaded to Central data repository
Route 2
Member state internal systems
Access database template
EEA Conversion service
Harry: Harry to discuss the two reporting routes and how these reflect differences in MS.
Uploaded to Central data repository
Compliant GML

17. Next Steps
Ian:

18. EEA Hosted Conversion Service for Access Files

19. EU Registry Now Open for Testing by Reporters

20. Currently Under Development……..
Harry: Harry to discuss the overview diagram, highlighting the intention of the EEA to create public data products.

21. Testing EU Registry – from November 2017
Next steps
Additional GML validation step to be introduced to supplement XML validation
Testing EU Registry – from November 2017
Ongoing development of thematic reporting elements
Legal Basis required to support the collection of some data fields which are not currently mandatory.
Ian

22. Dr. Ian Marnane Project manager - Industrial pollution
Contact details
Dr. Ian Marnane Project manager - Industrial pollution   
             
Phone:
Ian