Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byYanti Budiono Modified over 6 years ago
1
Estimation of Skin Color Range Using Achromatic Features
Wen-Hung Liao Department of Computer Science National Chengchi University November 27, 2008
2
Outline Motivation and Related Work Color Spaces
Fixed vs. Dynamic Range Approach Experimental Results Skin color segmentation Hand & finger detection Conclusion
3
Background Previous claims: skin color is restricted to a “fixed” range in certain color coordinates: Sobottka & Pitas: Hue:[0,50º], Saturation:[0.23,0.68] Chai & Ngan: Cb:[77,127], Cr[137,177] Kawato & Ohya: Decision boundary in normalized RGB space
4
Decision Boundary in Normalized RGB Space
5
Sobottka & Pitas: Fixed Hue + Saturation
6
Chai & Ngan: Fixed Cb,Cr
7
Kawato & Ohya
8
Comparative Analysis From: Phung et al, Skin segmentation using color pixel classification: analysis and comparison, IEEE Transactions on PAMI, 2005.
9
Observation It is true that the skin color lies in a small range, yet this range tends to shift under different lighting conditions. Question: Is it possible to dynamically adjust the range of skin color to enhance the robustness of color-based segmentation?
10
The Proposed Solution Use achromatic information (face detection) to help determine the range. Limitation: Face must be present and detected. Suitable for vision-based human computer interface.
11
Five Classes of Color Space
Representative color space Basic color spaces RGB、normalized RGB Perceptual color spaces HSV、HIS Orthogonal color spaces YCbCr、YUV Perceptually uniform color spaces CIELab、CIELuv Other color spaces Mixture
12
Color Spaces Investigated
domains RGB Red、Green、Blue HSV Hue、Saturation、Value CIELab L、a、b YCbCr Y、Cb、Cr CIELuv L、u、v * Dynamically set the threshold in Hue domain
13
Determining the Threshold (I)
Step 1: detecting and locating the face Step 2: mark the cheek area X = X0 +(W0 /5) Y = Y0 +(H0 /2) width = W0 /5 height = H0 /5 Step 3: obtain the hue distribution of the marked area. W0 (X0, Y0) H0
14
Determining the Threshold (II)
Step 4: assume that the histogram is peaked at A: search to the left and right of A until Local minimum <A/10 is uncovered A non-zero global minimum is found 255
15
Face Detection using DSE
Directional Sobel Edges
16
Experiment: Skin Color Segmentation
Compare the performance of 5 different methods: Dynamic threshold Fixed threshold – fixed Hue Kawato & Ohya – fixed Normalized RGB Sobottka & Pitas – fixed Hue & Saturation Chai & Ngan – fixed Cb & Cr Material Images captured by a low-cost webcam under different lighting conditions. A total of 400 images (taken indoor) are manually segmented and labeled.
17
Skin Color Segmentation: Experimental Results
false positive false negative true negative true positive Dynamic Threshold 0.0736 0.1706 0.9264 0.8294 fixed Hue 0.2125 0.3361 0.7875 0.6639 fixed Normalized RGB 0.0504 0.5303 0.9496 0.4697 fixed Hue & Sat 0.0588 0.5747 0.9412 0.4253 fixed Cr & Cb 0.0857 0.2996 0.9143 0.7004
18
Best and Worst Case Performance
best TP worst TP Dynamic Threshold 0.9947 0.3494 fixed Hue 0.9977 0.0733 fixed Normalized RGB 0.9055 0.0002 fixed Hue & Sat 0.8891 0.0005 fixed Cr & Cb 0.9447 0.2234
19
Recall and Precision Recall = TP/(TP+FP) Precision = TP/(TP+FN)
20
Speed-up the Process 1. Detecting Face (After K frames)
2. Record color distribution of cheek area 3. Tracking face 4. Local search 5. Update color distribution
21
Performance Improvement
22
Experiment: Hand Detection
Color-based hand segmentation No post-processing Does not involve statistical modeling and classifier
23
Plamar vs. Dorsal Side Hue histogram Hue histogram
24
Hand Detection: Experimental Results
Dorsal side Dorsal side (fingers) Plamar side Plamar side (fingers) Accuracy 92.65% 94.26% 90.78% 95.01% 24
25
Fingertip Detection 150 images # of fingers detected Dynamic threshold
Fixed Threshold 5 108 72% 17 11% 4 21 14% 22 15% 3 10 7% 23 2 3% 20 13% 1 1% 48 33%
26
Conclusion Perform comparative evaluation of several color-based segmentation methods. Propose and implement a dynamic range estimation algorithm using achromatic features. Superior performance in terms of skin-color segmentation, hand and finger detection. Suitable for vision-based HCI.
27
Thank you Q & A
28
Experimental Result Dynamic Threshold worst TP
29
Experimental Result Fixed Hue worst TP 29
30
Experimental Result Fixed Normalized RGB worst TP 30
31
Experiment Result Fixed Hue & Saturation worst TP 31
32
Experiment Result Fixed Cb & Cr worst TP 32
33
Recall = TP/(TP+FP) Precision = TP/(TP+FN)
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.