Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Alternative intubation techniques vs Macintosh laryngoscopy in patients with cervical spine immobilization: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Alternative intubation techniques vs Macintosh laryngoscopy in patients with cervical spine immobilization: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized."— Presentation transcript:

1 Alternative intubation techniques vs Macintosh laryngoscopy in patients with cervical spine immobilization: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials  L. Suppan, M.R. Tramèr, M. Niquille, O. Grosgurin, C. Marti  British Journal of Anaesthesia  Volume 116, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016) DOI: /bja/aev205 Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

2 Fig 1 Study flow chart. RCT, randomized controlled trial.
British Journal of Anaesthesia  , 27-36DOI: ( /bja/aev205) Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

3 Fig 2 Intubation failure at first attempt; alternative devices vs Macintosh laryngoscopy. British Journal of Anaesthesia  , 27-36DOI: ( /bja/aev205) Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

4 Fig 3 Intubation failure at first attempt; individual alternative devices vs Macintosh laryngoscopy. British Journal of Anaesthesia  , 27-36DOI: ( /bja/aev205) Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

5 Fig 4 Cormack grade 1; individual alternative devices vs Macintosh laryngoscopy. British Journal of Anaesthesia  , 27-36DOI: ( /bja/aev205) Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions


Download ppt "Alternative intubation techniques vs Macintosh laryngoscopy in patients with cervical spine immobilization: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google