Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

JEM-SMILES Instrumental Capabilities

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "JEM-SMILES Instrumental Capabilities"— Presentation transcript:

1 JEM-SMILES Instrumental Capabilities
Junji INATANI Space Utilization Research Program NASDA Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

2 “Mission Plan” Chapter 3
Introduction ISS and JEM SMILES Payload Field of View (FOV) Altitude Scanning of the Antenna Global Coverage Interference with FOV Antenna Response Pattern ISS Orbit and Attitude Variations Tangent Height Calibration Spectral Regions and Sensitivity Observation Frequency Bands Frequency Down-conversion Acousto-optic Spectrometer Sensitivity Brightness Temperature Calibration Conclusion Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

3 Introduction ISS and JEM SMILES Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

4 Japanese Experiment Module: “KIBO”
SMILES Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

5 Instruments SMILES: Superconducting Submillimeter-wave Limb-emission Sounder View in the Cryostat Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

6 Signal Flow Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

7 Receiver Sensitivity: SIS vs SBD
SBD mixer receiver SIS mixer receiver hf/k: Quantum Limit Superconductive SIS mixer receivers have some 20 times higher sensitivity than conventional Schottky-diode mixer receivers for frequencies less than 700 GHz. Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

8 Inside the SIS Mixer Mount Developed by NASDA in-house activity.
640 GHz SIS Mixer Inside the SIS Mixer Mount Developed by NASDA in-house activity. 0.4 mm Nb/AlOx/Nb Mixer Device Fabricated at NAOJ, Nobeyama Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

9 Cryostat Radiation Shield: MLI (40 layers)
Signal Input Window: IR Filters (‘Zitex’) Support for 100 K Stage: S2-GFRP Straps (12 pieces) Support for 20 K Stage: GFRP Pipes (4 pieces) Support for 4 K Stage: CFRP Pipes (4 pieces) Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

10 4 K Mechanical Cooler Cooling to 100 K & 20 K:
Cooling Capacity: 20 mW @ 4.5 K K K Power Consumption: 300 W @ 120 VDC Mass: Cooler 40 kg Cryostat 26 kg Electronics 24 kg Total 90 kg Cooling to 100 K & 20 K: Two-stage Stirling Cooler Cooling to 4.5 K: Joule-Thomson Cooler Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

11 Mechanical Components of Coolers
Cold-head and Compressor for Two-stage Stirling Cooler Two Compressors for Joule-Thomson Cooler Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

12 Sub-mm Receiver Subsystem
To Antenna Ambient Temperature Optics AOPT Cryostat To Cold-Sky Terminator AAMP Single Sideband Filter CREC Sub-mm LO Source He Compressor (JT) He Compressor (ST) Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

13 Acousto-Optical Spectrometer
Bandwidth: 1200 MHz x 2 units IF: GHz / unit Focal Plane: 1728-ch. CCD array x 2 units Frequency Resolution: 1.8 MHz (FWHM) Channel Separation: 0.8 MHz / ch. AD Conversion: 12-bit, 2-CCD readouts in 4.9 msec Adder Output: 16 bits x 1728 ch. x 2 units in 500 msec AOS (Astrium & OPM) Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

14 Field of View (FOV) Altitude Scanning of the Antenna Global Coverage
Interference with FOV Antenna Response Pattern ISS Orbit and Attitude Variations Tangent Height Calibration Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

15 Atmosphere Scanning A single spectral profile is acquired in every 0.5 sec, in which the antenna moves deg in six angular steps. Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

16 Antenna Response Pattern
Effective Pattern: Integrated over AZ angles Averaged for six consecutive EL points involved in a unit data Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

17 Height Resolution (Antenna)
Angular Width (or Interval) [deg] Linear Width (or Interval) at Tangent Point Heights: 10 – 60 km [km] ISS: 350 km ISS: 400 km ISS: 460 km HPBW 0.096 3.82 – 3.24 4.08 – 3.51 4.41 – 3.82 Sampling Interval 2.25 – 1.92 2.42 – 2.10 2.60 – 2.26 A refraction effect is included, which is significant for TPH < 20 km. Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

18 Global Coverage Trajectory for 24 Hours The Arctic Region
Covered Latitudes: 68N – 35S (ISS Yaw: +15 deg) 65N – 38S (ISS Yaw: 0 deg) 61N – 42S (ISS Yaw: -15 deg) Horizontal Sampling Interval: about 360 km in orbital direction Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

19 Direction of Line-of-sight
Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

20 FOV Interference Blue: with Main Beam by Solar Paddle
Orange: with CST by SUN Red: with Main Beam by SUN FOV Interference Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

21 ISS Orbit Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

22 ISS Attitude Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

23 How to Determine Tangent Point Height
HCS: Heliocentric Coordinate System GCS: Geocentric Coordinate System Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

24 Errors in Tangent Point Height (1-s level)
Causes of Errors Bias [km] Random [km] Errors in Attitude: Sub-mm beam offset errors 5.02 - Mechanical driving errors 0.27 Thermal bending errors 0.12 Mechanical alignment errors STT measurement errors 0.06 Time synchronization errors 0.50 0.18 Errors in Altitude: ISS positional errors 0.30 0.10 Overall Error with the beam offset 5.07 0.34 Overall Error w/o the beam offset 0.76 Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

25 Spectral Regions and Sensitivity
Observation Frequency Bands Frequency Down-conversion Acousto-optic Spectrometer Sensitivity Brightness Temperature Calibration Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

26 Expected Spectra: Band-A
Limb Scanning A Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

27 Expected Spectra: Band-B
Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

28 Expected Spectra: Band-C
Limb Scanning C Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

29 Frequency Down-conversion
Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

30 Single Sideband Filter
Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

31 Effect of Image Band (1) Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

32 Effect of Image Band (2) Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

33 AOS: Differential Non-linearity
Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

34 Standing Waves Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

35 Expected Sensitivity Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

36 Sensitivity and Accuracy
Causes Sensitivity Accuracy of Absolute Brightness Excess Brightness Radiometric Noise Gain Variation Gain Non-linearity Standing Waves DNL* in AOS Knowledge Errors** * Differential non-linearity of the A/D converter. ** Concerning antenna characteristics and temperature measurement errors. Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

37 Accuracy of Absolute Brightness Temp.
Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

38 Conclusions (1) Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

39 Conclusions (2) Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

40 Conclusions (3) Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES


Download ppt "JEM-SMILES Instrumental Capabilities"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google