Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

How does the state calculate the ratings?

Published byJunior French Modified over 6 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "How does the state calculate the ratings?"— Presentation transcript:

1 How does the state calculate the ratings?
State Report Card How does the state calculate the ratings?

2 State Report Card Ratings
Absolute rating - a measure of a school’s effectiveness on various achievement measures Growth rating - compare current performance to the previous year’s performance There is both an absolute index (number from 1 to 5) and an absolute rating (descriptive word, such as Average). Similarly, there is a growth index (numerical) and a growth rating (descriptive word).

3 Summary of How to Calculate Report Card Ratings
Absolute Rating Elementary and middle Number from 1 to 5, usually around 3.0 Change to At Risk, Below Average, Average, Good, and Excellent using a chart Based on each student’s individual PASS scores High schools Based on five criteria: Longitudinal HSAP, 1st-Attempt HSAP, End of Course, On-Time Grad Rate, and Five-Year Grad Rate District Based on 50% elementary and middle school test scores and 50% four criteria: 1st-Attempt HSAP, End of Course, On-Time Grad Rate, and Five-Year Grad Rate Growth Rating Number from 40 to 140, usually around 90 Based on each student’s growth or decline on PASS scores High schools and district Small number, usually around plus or minus .1 Subtract last year's absolute index from this year's absolute index

4 Aiken County Public Schools State Report Card
Rating 2009 2010 2011 Absolute Below Average 2.7 Average 2.97 3.02 Growth At-Risk -0.46 Excellent 0.4 0.0 (0.05)

5 2009-2011 Absolute Rating Comparison
School 2009 2010 2011 JEFFERSON Average AIKEN Excellent BELVEDERE BYRD J D LEVER CLEARWATER EAST AIKEN GLOVERVILLE GREENDALE HAMMOND HILL MILLBROOK Good NORTH AIKEN Below Average NORTH AUGUSTA RIDGE SPRING-MONETTA Elem/Middle CYRIL B BUSBEE WARRENVILLE OAKWOOD-WINDSOR REDCLIFFE CHUKKER CREEK MOSSY CREEK

6 2009-2011 Absolute Rating Comparison
School 2009 2010 2011 PAUL KNOX MIDDLE Average LANGLEY-BATH-CLEARWATER MIDDLE LEAVELLE-MCCAMPBELL MIDDLE NEW ELLENTON MIDDLE NORTH AUGUSTA MIDDLE Good Excellent MINNIE B KENNEDY MIDDLE A L CORBETT MIDDLE Below Average SCHOFIELD MIDDLE JACKSON MIDDLE AIKEN MIDDLE RIDGE SPRING-MONETTA MIDDLE At-Risk

7 2009-2011 Absolute Rating Comparison
School 2009 2010 2011 AIKEN HIGH Average SOUTH AIKEN HIGH Good Excellent MIDLAND VALLEY HIGH NORTH AUGUSTA HIGH SILVER BLUFF HIGH RIDGE-SPRING MONETTA HIGH Below Average WAGENER SALLEY HIGH ACC&TC

8 2009-2011 Growth Rating Comparison
School 2010 2011 JEFFERSON Average AIKEN Good Excellent BELVEDERE BYRD J D LEVER CLEARWATER EAST AIKEN GLOVERVILLE GREENDALE HAMMOND HILL MILLBROOK NORTH AIKEN Below Average NORTH AUGUSTA RIDGE SPRING-MONETTA Elem/Middle At-Risk CYRIL B BUSBEE WARRENVILLE OAKWOOD-WINDSOR REDCLIFFE CHUKKER CREEK MOSSY CREEK

9 2009-2011 Growth Rating Comparison
School 2009 2010 2011 PAUL KNOX MIDDLE Average LANGLEY-BATH-CLEARWATER MIDDLE LEAVELLE-MCCAMPBELL MIDDLE NEW ELLENTON MIDDLE NORTH AUGUSTA MIDDLE Good Excellent MINNIE B KENNEDY MIDDLE A L CORBETT MIDDLE Unsatisfactory Below Average SCHOFIELD MIDDLE JACKSON MIDDLE AIKEN MIDDLE RIDGE SPRING-MONETTA MIDDLE At-Risk

10 2009-2011 Growth Rating Comparison
School 2009 2010 2011 AIKEN HIGH Below Average SOUTH AIKEN HIGH Excellent Average MIDLAND VALLEY HIGH Good At-Risk NORTH AUGUSTA HIGH SILVER BLUFF HIGH RIDGE-SPRING MONETTA HIGH WAGENER SALLEY HIGH ACC&TC

11 “Districts Like Ours” Plus or minus 5% poverty.

12 Operation dollars spent per Pupil
District Poverty Index Student Population Absolute Rating Index Operation dollars spent per Pupil Percent of Operations spent on Instruction and Support Total dollars spent per pupil on Instruction SPARTANBURG 01 64.96% 5,077 3.67 $9,227 72.99% $6,734.79 BEAUFORT 01 66.09% 19,715 2.9 $10,606 70.38% $7,464.50 LANCASTER 01 66.28% 11,652 3.02 $8,820 72.25% $6,372.45 ANDERSON 02 66.45% 3,691 3.26 $7,995 72.77% $5,817.96 ANDERSON 04 66.78% 2,849 3.34 $9,785 70.30% $6,878.86 SC PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL DISTRICT 66.83% 9,167 2.09 GREENWOOD 52 66.93% 1,607 $8,744 $5,843.62 KERSHAW 01 67.66% 10,347 3.1 $8,567 72.04% $6,171.67 ANDERSON 05 67.83% 12,500 3.18 $8,356 70.74% $5,911.03 SPARTANBURG 06 68.10% 10,564 3.48 $8,655 73.37% $6,350.17 SPARTANBURG 04 68.60% 2,991 3.25 $7,482 71.09% $5,318.95 AIKEN 01 69.72% 24,600 $7,537 74.01% $5,578.13 OCONEE 01 69.80% 10,567 $9,671 71.59% $6,923.47 CLARENDON 03 70.02% 1,237 $8,452 70.40% $5,950.21 BERKELEY 01 70.64% 29,263 3.11 $8,332 70.20% $5,849.06 EDGEFIELD 01 70.71% 4,007 3 $8,080 67.14% $5,424.91 YORK 01 70.88% 5,205 3.15 $8,875 70.70% $6,274.63 FLORENCE 01 71.58% 15,906 3.08 $9,221 73.82% $6,806.94 SPARTANBURG 03 72.40% 2,999 $9,938 68.83% $6,840.33 GREENWOOD 50 73.23% 9,068 3.06 $8,726 69.73% $6,084.64 HORRY 01 73.53% 38,517 3.24 $9,944 71.69% $7,128.85 GEORGETOWN 01 74.03% 9,747 $9,739 69.75% $6,792.95 BAMBERG 01 74.08% 1,494 3.01 $9,751 69.26% $6,753.54 FLORENCE 05 74.19% 1,472 3.53 $9,865 72.13% $7,115.62

13

14

15 Graduation Rate

16 Quick Facts (as percentages)

17 Quick facts continued…

18 Quick facts continued…

19

20 Questions ?

Download ppt "How does the state calculate the ratings?"

Similar presentations

Capital Improvement Funding. State of the District Facilities 50% of Aiken County Public Schools are between 40 and 60 years old Leavelle McCampbell Middle.

Capital Improvement Funding. State of the District Facilities 50% of Aiken County Public Schools are between 40 and 60 years old Leavelle McCampbell Middle.
1 Test Data Review and Adequate Yearly Progress. 2.

1 Test Data Review and Adequate Yearly Progress. 2.
Palmetto Assessment of State Standards (PASS) and State and Federal Accountability Elementary and Middle School Principals November 5, 2009.

Palmetto Assessment of State Standards (PASS) and State and Federal Accountability Elementary and Middle School Principals November 5, 2009.
Courtney Mills. ESEA (Formerly AYP)  Federal Accountability  August  0 – 100, A – F  One per school (includes a breakdown by grade band)  Two Components:

Courtney Mills. ESEA (Formerly AYP)  Federal Accountability  August  0 – 100, A – F  One per school (includes a breakdown by grade band)  Two Components:
Following One Course Until Successful Those who built on the wall, and those who carried burdens, loaded themselves so that with one hand they worked.

Following One Course Until Successful Those who built on the wall, and those who carried burdens, loaded themselves so that with one hand they worked.
Advisory Group Members Montina Jones, Director of Urban Schools Sandy Roach, Magnet Supervisor Donna Howard, Principal Coach Brenda Reliford, Maynard.

Advisory Group Members Montina Jones, Director of Urban Schools Sandy Roach, Magnet Supervisor Donna Howard, Principal Coach Brenda Reliford, Maynard.
1 Union County School District Instructional Update 10 December 2007 Dr. David Eubanks Superintendent.

1 Union County School District Instructional Update 10 December 2007 Dr. David Eubanks Superintendent.
CEP – Nutrition Services. Overview – Nutrition Services Option provides an alternative to household applications for free and reduced price meals in high.

CEP – Nutrition Services. Overview – Nutrition Services Option provides an alternative to household applications for free and reduced price meals in high.
Accountability Services North Carolina Department of Public Instruction January 14, 2015 School Performance Grades.

Accountability Services North Carolina Department of Public Instruction January 14, 2015 School Performance Grades.
Using School Climate Surveys to Categorize Schools and Examine Relationships with School Achievement Christine DiStefano, Diane M. Monrad, R.J. May, Patricia.

Using School Climate Surveys to Categorize Schools and Examine Relationships with School Achievement Christine DiStefano, Diane M. Monrad, R.J. May, Patricia.
Some is not a number. Soon is not a time.. Donald M. Berwick, MD, MPP President and CEO, Institute for Healthcare Improvement “The names of the patients.

Some is not a number. Soon is not a time.. Donald M. Berwick, MD, MPP President and CEO, Institute for Healthcare Improvement “The names of the patients.
Projecting Student Enrollment MoAsbo Spring Conference, 2001 Copies of all handouts/worksheets/presentation also found at Park Hill’s Web Site

Projecting Student Enrollment MoAsbo Spring Conference, 2001 Copies of all handouts/worksheets/presentation also found at Park Hill’s Web Site
Andrea E. Loney, Esquire – Executive Director Jim O. Stuckey, Esquire – Board Chairman.

Andrea E. Loney, Esquire – Executive Director Jim O. Stuckey, Esquire – Board Chairman.
2010 LPSS Accountability Results November 3, 2010.

2010 LPSS Accountability Results November 3, 2010.
The Burden of Diabetes in South Carolina 2009. Chapter 1. Demographics and Access to Health Care.

The Burden of Diabetes in South Carolina Chapter 1. Demographics and Access to Health Care.
Economic Conditions in South Carolina Monthly Indicators May 2006.

Economic Conditions in South Carolina Monthly Indicators May 2006.
Adequate Yearly Progress

Adequate Yearly Progress
South Carolina Highlights. Farm Definition Any place from which $1,000 of agricultural products were produced and sold, or would normally would have been.

South Carolina Highlights. Farm Definition Any place from which $1,000 of agricultural products were produced and sold, or would normally would have been.
Poverty, Income & Employment Comparisons in Manitowoc County.

Poverty, Income & Employment Comparisons in Manitowoc County.
K-12 Performance South Carolina and Greenville. South Carolina Rankings  Quality Counts  NAEP – National Assessment of Educational Progress  Graduation.

K-12 Performance South Carolina and Greenville. South Carolina Rankings  Quality Counts  NAEP – National Assessment of Educational Progress  Graduation.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google