Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byKarolina Dominika Piekarska Modified over 6 years ago
1
Thermal noise and high order Laguerre-Gauss modes J-Y. Vinet, B
Thermal noise and high order Laguerre-Gauss modes J-Y. Vinet, B. Mours, E. Tournefier GWADW meeting, Isola d’Elba May 27th – Jun 2nd , 2006
2
Introduction What can be gained with high order Laguerre-Gauss modes?
Mirror thermal noise will limit the interferometers sensitivities around few 100 Hz Thermal noise is smaller with more uniformly distributed power => Spherical-spherical cavities instead of flat-spherical cavities (Virgo case) => Flat beams Flat beam issues: Production of flat beams Production of “Mexican hat” mirrors More coating thermal noise? What can be gained with high order Laguerre-Gauss modes? - Advantage: use classical mirrors
3
U: Strain energy of the mirror under a
Mirror thermal noise Mirror bulk thermal noise estimated with the BHV model (Phys. Lett A 246 (1998) 227) Displacement noise PSD: U: Strain energy of the mirror under a pressure distribution having the profile of the readout beam Thermal noise smaller for flatter profiles Loss angle LG(0,0) w0=5cm LG(0,3) w0=5cm LG(2,2) w0=5cm Flat w=11.3 cm LG(5,5)
4
Diffraction losses m=0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Diffraction losses
Potential problem with high order modes: diffraction losses Ensure that diffraction losses stay below 1 ppm a/ spherical-spherical cavities with Virgo type mirrors (35 cm) b/ for each mode adjust the beam size so that diffraction losses = 1 ppm Order n of LG(n,m) a/w for 1 ppm losses m=0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Diffraction losses a/w = Mirror radius / beam waist 1 ppm
5
Thermal noise reduction
Reduction of thermal noise with respect to present Virgo configuration Ratio of thermal noise for: LG(n,m) in spherical-spherical cavity / TEM00 w=2cm m=0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 TEM00 w=6.7cm Thermal noise reduction Flat beam w=11.3cm Order n of LG(n,m) => Thermal noise reduced by a factor 3 to 5 with respect to present Virgo configuration => Can reach results even better than flat beams !
6
Advantages / Issues Optics: Mirrors uniformity on large diameter
Large but standard optics (spherical mirrors, mode cleaners,…) Cavities compatible with TEM00 beam Production of high order Laguerre-Gauss modes: With a fiber laser: Bragg fibers can produce LG modes? Diffractive optical elements (DOE) ? Error signals: Longitudinal locking: in principle no difference with TEM00 Alignment: higher order modes more sensitive to misalignments
7
Alignment/matching issues
Mis-alignments Beam waist mis-matching Dominantly couples to non-degenerated modes => can be cleaned up by output mode cleaner Losses larger than for (0,0) mode => more stringent constraints on misalignments / matching Example LG(2,2) vs (0,0) mode: - alignment: should be 2-3 times more precise - waist: should be 4 times more precisely matched Coupling to cavity LG(0,0) w0=5cm LG(2,2) w0=5cm misalignment X (cm)
8
Conclusions High order LG modes seem to be a good alternative to flat beams Thermal noise can be comparable to or even lower than flat beams Standard spherical optics can be used Losses: slightly larger constraints on alignment than with TEM00 Not too risky: optics compatible with standard TEM00 beam
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.