Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byFlavien Jean-Claude St-Laurent Modified over 6 years ago
1
July 13-25, 2000, Hanoi, Vietnam Aurelio Bay Institut de Physique
des Hautes Energies
2
SM g b The Unitary Triangle t d b W (1-r)2+h2 Im ~ (1-r)2 + h2 r2+h2
from Dm: (1-r)2+h2 Im ~ (1-r)2 + h2 r2+h2 from BÆXu+ln B0 ~Vtd J/Y Ks B0 t ~Vub W W t B0 b g Re CP Asym ~ sin[2(b+fnew )] The Unitary Triangle
3
+ New FCNC + + b+fnew b+fnew (1-r)2+h2 + rnew d b ~ (1-r)2 + h2
from Dm: (1-r)2+h2 + rnew + + d b NEW FCNC ~ (1-r)2 + h2 r2+h2 = cte from BÆXu+ln + rnew Unchanged B0 t W t b+fnew NEW b+fnew
4
SM + New FCNC + g b+fnew The Unitary Triangle t d b W (1-r)2+h2 +rnew
from Dm: (1-r)2+h2 +rnew + Im d b NEW FCNC ~ (1-r)2 + h2 r2+h2 from BÆXu+ln + rnew B0 J/Y Ks Unchanged B0 ~Vub t W W t B0 g b+fnew NEW Re CP Asym ~ sin(2(b+fnew)) The Unitary Triangle
5
g from Bd Æ D*-np+, D*+np-, etc.
CP in BÆJ/Y Ks ~ 2(b + fnew) Bd Æ D*+ np vs Bd Æ D*+ np Bd Æ D*- np vs Bd Æ D*- np From 2(b + fnew) + g g Idem with Bs decays: compare the two g determinations (then combine them) 2 ( dg + fsnew ) from CP in Bs Æ J/y f 2 ( dg + fsnew ) - g from CP in Bs Æ Ds-K+, Ds+ K- g We want to measure g, we need to select hadronic decay channels, we want to study the Bs system, have K/p separation, access to Br < 10-7….
6
Rate(bb) = 105 sec-1 : 0.5% total inelastic
LHCb overlook BABAR, BELLE, CLEO-III, CDF, D0, HERA-B will test CKM at the O(l3) level. LHCb is a second generation experiment for CP violation studies in the B and Bs meson systems. The goal is to obtain precise and overconstrained determination of CKM elements, including terms beyond O(l3). This will permit to detect deviations from the Standard Model description and thus to probe New Physics. Second generation means: High statistics is needed to study Bu,d,s decays with Br < 10-7 Excellent proper time resolution Excellent particle identification Efficient and flexible triggering scheme, including a selection on hadrons. High statistics can be obtained by LHCb because B production cross section at 14 TeV: LHCb running luminosity: fi sbb ≈ 500 mb cm-2 s-1 Rate(bb) = 105 sec-1 : 0.5% total inelastic
7
LHCb non-bending plane view
Magnet dipole non-bending plane view LHC beams collide here Vertex Locator x z 20 m 10 m Open geometry with (quite) easy access to (almost) all components q Œ [15, 300] mrad h Œ [4.9, 1.9]
8
LHCb bending plane
9
Vertex Locator (VELO) s impact parameter [mm] Z 100 10 0.1 1 10
-20 80 cm toward spectrometer s impact parameter 100 10 [mm] Pt [GeV] Z retract by 3 cm during beam setup cm sz ≈ 40 mm resolution on interaction point • ≈ 200 mm Si single-side • R and f measuring planes • 220 kchannels, analogue R/O, S/N =15 Design work on front-end chip (DMILL and sub-micron technolgies) in progress prototype of R measuring 1/2 plane
10
RICH K–p separation > 3 s 1<p< 100 GeV/c pixel HPD Aerogel
Gas CF4 Gas C4F10 Aerogel RICH K–p separation > 3 s 1<p< 100 GeV/c large aerogel rings small C4F10 CF4 rings
11
RICH R&D Photodetectors options: HPDs and multianode PMTs
single photoelectron resolution QE = 17% @ 400 nm spatial resolution ~1 mm large area ~2.9 m2, active: ~ 70% Æ 325 kchan. binary readout B stray field up to 100 gauss radiation dose < 3kRad/year pedestal 1 p.e. 2 p.e. 3 p.e. 4 p.e. Pion beam: large rings in aerogel and small rings in C4F10 threshold DEP prototype pixel HPD
12
Other Systems Magnet: Warm dipole 4 Tm - 4.2 MW - 1450t TDR ok Tracker
Inner: (40x60 cm2) triple GEM , Si 3 stations Outer: straw-tube drift chambers sp/p = 0.3 % [5 , 200] GeV/c s(MB->pp) =15 MeV/c2 s(MD->KKp) = 4 MeV/c2 Calorimeter (design completed) Pre-shower sandwich Pb - scintillators ECAL Shashlik type, 25 X0 HCAL Fe + scintillating tiles, 5.6l R/O by wave-length shifting fibers and PMTs MUON Resistive Plate Chambers (RPC) + Wire and Cathode Pad Chambers (WPC/CPC) for high rate regions
13
Joint Calorimeter Test
HCAL Fe+scintillating tiles ECAL Shashlik Joint Calorimeter Test preshower GeV ECAL resolution % 30 20 10 HCAL resolution % GeV
14
LHCb Trigger Efficiency
for reconstructed and correctly tagged events L0(%) L1(%) L2(%) Total(%) e h all BdJ/(ee)KS + tag BdJ/()KS + tag BsDsK + tag BdDK Bd + tag where the lepton trigger is important where the hadron trigger is important Tags considered (so far): muon or electron from other b-hadron b Æ lepton charged kaon from other b-hadron b Æ c Æ s Overall tag efficiency = 40% Overall mistag rate = 30%
15
Trigger System LHC: 40 MHz L0:1 MHz L1:40 KHz Output:200 Hz
High PT muons Latency: 4 ms < 2 ms L0 decision unit L1 Trigger 3D reconstruction of secondary vertices L2+L3 Trigger Full event information High PT electrons High PT hadrons Pileup Veto B0 Æ p+ p- Running luminosity 2 x 1032 Inelastic pp interactions hadron trigger threshold ~30 % ~10%
16
Mass, decay time resolutions and particle ID
Measurements of ms with a significance >5: up to psxs Bs-Bs oscillations with BsDs Dms = 30 ps-1 DsK Ds GeV/c2 without RICH with RICH Bs DsK separation from Bs Ds Mass(DsK) sm = 11 MeV/c2 Ds DsK GeV/c2
17
LHCb CP Sensitivities in 1 year
Parameter Channels+c.c No of events (1 year) Bd k @P/T = 30°, |P/T|=0.200.02, =90° -5 Bd0 r k @ =50° 2+ Bd D*(incl.) k @2+= BdJ/Ks k <0.6 -2 Bs DsK (Dms=15ps-1) (45ps-1) Bd DK* Bs J/ k Bs oscillations xs Bs Ds k up to 75 (5s) Rare Decays Bs s/b=3.5 Bd K0* s/b=16 Bd K* k s/b=1 See yellow Book CERN !
18
LHCb schedule (and conclusion)
1998 Technical Proposal 1999 LHCb approved Magnet 2000 RICH, Calorimeters Outer Tracker Technical Design Reports Muon System 2001 Vertex Detector Inner Tracker 2002 L0 & L1 Trigger, DAQ Computing 2003 Magnet installation Detector and DAQ installation 2004 2005 LHCb ready for LHC « day one » and for many years of B physics at “nominal LHCb luminosity”
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.